''PwC France is proud of its partnership with @RequestNetwork to meet the new challenges of the #blockchain...

twitter.com/PwC_France/status/1025297826656526337

''PwC France is proud of its partnership with @RequestNetwork to meet the new challenges of the #blockchain. Find all the information on this technology pwc.to/2L7gW4v #PwCSpécialEté''

''A dynamic part of PwC's global strategy
PwC's approach in France is part of an innovation process with technology partners, supported by its global network. In November 2016, PwC launched the Vulcan platform in collaboration with three startups. This platform provides PwC clients with integrated wallet, identity management and regulatory compliance services. PwC's clients can thus take advantage of the opportunities offered by blockchain and tokenised assets without having to manage the related technical and regulatory issues. Today, more than 200 PwC specialists in more than 15 countries are working on the blockchain''


REQ is going to be huge.

Attached: 1 iwvG3yU5PiZKxTPFrwemmg.png (1024x512, 41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PricewaterhouseCoopers#Request_Network
youtube.com/watch?v=QX3M8Ka9vUA&feature=youtu.be&t=29m11s
theaccountingblockchain.io/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Mozarella is going to be huge

I really don't understand why this isn't priced higher. PwC publicly shilling REQ should be extremely bullish.

I honestly believe REQ was strongly manipulated before and after the bull run. Whales suppressing the price on each pump because if the price is cheap before adoption then the long term gains are much greater due to greater token burn. Then the wiki and mozz fiasco made hodlers dump.

I really believe this project will take off in a few years, just had some really shitty luck due to the fundamentals of token economics. They definitely need to shape up overall with team leadership though to get more hodlers, and whoever posted that last update needs to be fired.

100% manipulated. Just buy and hold

Nice just bought 100k mozzarella at LIDL prices

Pwc france deluded brainlets. Its a fucking franchise

wont be surprised is thats partially why it behaves like shit in terms of price action. i can understand the dump, but not THAT big of a shitfest

by the way, every single tweet from PWC makes me more bullish. imho REQ's real value is with the accounting shit. the fiat meme doesnt really seem feasible to me.

anyways ive got a small bag of 25k ready to go

LOL its not the real pwc its just some shit country franchise
REQ is worth 0 cents

Eat shit

Attached: AB74C3F4-1911-4531-8CE8-8ED2BF01190F.jpg (1125x1770, 737K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PricewaterhouseCoopers#Request_Network

hmmmmmm

nice move, REQ's going down, mozzarella will skyrocket.

>Ctrl-F request network
>0 results found

Attached: 1533294917332.jpg (1316x887, 457K)

PwC france is the blockchain lab dummy.

Attached: 701677F5-CDD7-40A0-8C36-DD6F6E5C7C4C.png (1125x2436, 3.01M)

more deluded then VEN chinks

lol

Literally doesn't matter when devs have been constantly dumping tokens during the bear market. That's why the price dropped so much. I can't believe they didn't lock the tokens

fucking hell what a shitshow

Because I keep putting up huge sell orders every 1% increase so I can accumulate a few thousand more

Whale?

post proof or shut the fuck up faggot

I've been fudding REQ for a long time but this is unironically huge news. This actually puts REQ in Chainlink realm with the ability to start connecting dots, which I have been doing since they tweeted this.

Attached: 1532992808307.png (1584x879, 320K)

Dumb question but how do I see transaction history on binance

Dude what about that Req whale with 13mm tokens manipulating the market?

dude anybody with 100k can manipulate the market now

Normies don't understand what pwc is and why it is important or what auditing is or what tripple entry accounting is for how automated taxation, like automated vat payments matter.

Crypto prices are largely set by dumb money.

Well, dumb money (tron) and manipulating whales (manipulating things like link and req and accumulating ever more).

Just bought 100k. Easy money.

Same, unironically.

Very true. I'm an auditor and we've been up to speed on the impact od blockchain tech projects. The impact is revolutionary and will change my profession. The main focus will not be on substantive audit procedures anymore, but more on value added tasks like internal control improvement, consulting, business valuations, operational audits to impove processing and removing bottlenecks in production, ect ect.

This video isn't accounting related but everyone should watch Chapters 3 & 4 for a glimpse of the future.

youtube.com/watch?v=QX3M8Ka9vUA&feature=youtu.be&t=29m11s

Remember what happened with vechink and pwc gook?

I always assume, anyone who takes more than 30 or so seconds making a FUD image, puts effort in for some reason
A simple Req logo over monkeys would be effective

Completely different partnership. Vechain was using PwC for financial services. REQ is corroborating with PwC to create a new product.

It's not FUD if it's the truth tho

>auditor
shitposting on /biz

This is the biggest red flag about the project in my mind. The ICO was for raising money, and they raised something like $30M. Why the fuck are they dumping their own tokens in the first year, before the project is even finished? The $30M raised was for any operational expenses they might encounter. Why are they holding onto ETH and selling REQ to fund operations?

The point of ICOs is to raise money for your startup. Most of these startups are run by stupid people though who used the ICO to raise ETH. Very few were smart enough to actually convert the ETH to cash when closing the ICO. Now ETH is 1/3 of what it was when all these companies raised money. So it's 6 months later and their burn rate has only been increasing...but their startup cash is now less 1/3 of what it should have been worth. Can't wait for all the scammy projects to go under. Really shouldn't take too much longer...

If you're holding, or thinking of holding a token than held an ICO, ask them if they cashed out the ETH raised. Also ask them how much cash they still have on hand.....
You'll find that few want to talk about it and most only cashed out some of their ETH to pay dev salaries.

This space is going to be littered with dead startups before long. We're get to start seeing them dropping like flies...
This bear was badly needed.

this space is similar to hyip meme 10 years ago

>4 by 5 bingo
>only horizontal bingos possible
how the fuck am I supposed to play this shit ahahhahjahah

4 by 4 bingo I’m retarded reeeee no free space reeeeeeee

I mentioned the devs dumping Req on us on the subreddit and got downvoted by the cultists.
Let those brainlets hodl to 0.

Because a partnership with pwc france is not the same as being partnered with pwc. It's a shill tactic that's been used long before crypto.

The problem all started when you went on reddit in the first place faggot

The devs have not sold any of their REQ and they've proved this before by showing the dev wallet. The REQ that got added to the market were given to dapp developers. Once they have that it's of course their choice if they want to sell it or not. This is weaaaaak fud.

Yes but the PwC France website explicitly says they are the PwC global blockchain development branch... so this is for PwC global, it is exactly the same as being partnered with PwC. At least fucking read before spouting this garbage.

Kek nice

Kek I also wanted to make something like this. Not to fud to accumulate more but because they fucked everyone over.

Just look at this team, is this the next PayPal? No seniority what's so ever.

Attached: 1_jF9tSA4hgYqR3IfPxbJAqA.jpg (844x1500, 426K)

This explanation kinda just shifts the same view to a different angle. Anyway...I thought they were going to give daap developers ETH that was raised in the ICO? Maybe be I misunderstood the update where they explained that, but I don't understand why wouldn't they do that? They are paying daap developers to contribute to their project....this is an operational cost....why are they paying these costs in REQ and not in ETH or USD that they raised in the ICO? It's not like these are partners they are bringing on and offering an equity deal to.

At this point they probably just wait it out for another half a year, then say "Well we tryd, but it seems there is no demand for our network, we will stop development".
And then they'll be off with the 80k ETH.

Yeah, it seems like that's where this is going. I mean the platform they committed to building isn't that far off is it? It's been a long time since I've looked at their roadmap, but from what I remember it seemed like they wanted to focus on the core of the vision and then let other developers build out the REQ ecosystem.
It was my understanding that they would be offering 'grants' to developers who wanted to get involved which would be paid in the ETH raised at ICO. This other user is saying they're paying in REQ though....so who knows. I don't really care enough about this project to look into it any further....

As a startup, REQs burn rate is probably pretty low. I mean for hell's sake, they moved to Singapore because it's cheap to live there and they can keep costs down. Those guys have had a pretty good plan though desu. Spend as little as possible of the money raised while working on the project for a year or two....after that. Call it done and walk away.

>Singapore
>Cheap

Choose 1 user

IDK...Singapore more expensive than France?

Agreed. I hold 108k.

CPA here, worked for Deloitte +10 years.
TAB > REQ
Don't miss the train to the moon boys!
theaccountingblockchain.io/

Attached: TAB.jpg (502x510, 24K)

What is TAB's competitive advantage?

lmao, nice pajeet scam