HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: Screenshot_20180803-101616.png (1080x1920, 213K)

>the top
>BTC topped at $0.08

>ChainLink needs other crypto
It's an API exchange for smart contracts. It can handle converting any type of currency for a plethora of goods, esepcially anything with a QR code. It doesn't even need crypto, but it will have it.

>partnering with SWIFT just when SWIFT's getting anally rekt by Ripple

Funfact Ripple and BNB have been all over the place for the last 16 hours and it's made me 12% on swings. Feels good man.

>SWIFT's getting anally rekt by Ripple
lmao

You have to be this brainlet to hold link

Attached: 1532303733462.jpg (750x920, 95K)

No flushing of the loo . 1 cup of water = 1 rupee

LINK FUDders really grasping at straws here, posting about 10% movements like it matters. No one who is holding LINK is even watching the daily charts unless they want to increase their stack. See you in 3 years, let me know how Mobius works out for you.

Dubs confirm.

Today's cmc hack is the perfect example of why link is needed. Can you imagine smart contract CFDs based on cmc's centralized Oracle fucking everyone over today. The same principal applies to everything from commodity prices to flight insurance.

newsbtc.com/2018/06/06/swift-continues-struggle-ripples-growing-success-financial-sector/

>"b-but we can move money in 24 hours n-now"
>"b-but blockchain is shit"
>"b-but we have a partnership with chainlink"
The absolute state of SWIFT

chainlink would rely on cmc data, so it would still FAIL

I'll just buy the bottom like last time

No, crypto prices is one of the obvious areas where Link can get data from multiple sources.

Bump

This microcosm exemplifies an issue with relying on oracles and immutable smart contracts - even utilizing a decentralized oracle network doesn't 100% protect contract users from getting completely F'd if the source of information (API) is inaccurate. From what I understand, consensus/aggregation protocols at the oracle layer is some defense against this, but I'm not sure how the aggregation could be handled in such a way that is completely protected from this kind of inaccuracy. For example, if the aggregation was merely producing an 'average' value across multiple oracles, and one of those oracles was producing its value from CMC when it experienced this bug, the average would still be dramatically affected.

Attached: imnotselling.jpg (265x190, 9K)

Attached: 6A934CB3-8047-4EB9-AAE2-0A7EEB447D1E.jpg (680x1073, 214K)

CMC itself relies on multiple sources you retard usually it omits outliers

So cmc fucking up proves link won't work? Ok brainlet

No you absolute moron. LINK van't verify that the data is good, only that it wasn't tampered with between OKEX and CMC.

The smart contracts will need to be designed. But you could easily make it that the outlier source if you have say 4 sources is discarded. Or that the contract is delayed until the sources are within a certain range of one another.

>muh erc shitcoin eth token is the only promising project

Attached: 951.png (200x300, 28K)

Link is auditable you pleb

That;s like saying apple shares arent worth buying because they print them on paper

Heard of outliers before? Very easy to account for. There will be multiple aggregation contracts.

you realize it's a fucking erc20 token and literally would not be abke to be used if eth had no hashpower... r-right?

i suck dick for fat stacks of linkies.

False dilemma faggot

damn you called the 10k satoshi top, pretty impressive, care to share some screenshots?

Attached: 1513595246108.png (299x288, 100K)

Pls sir, buy mobius sir

Not really, everything is shit except Chainlink. Btc and Eth of course are good, but don't expect 1000x types of gains from them