Well, can you Jow Forums?

Well, can you Jow Forums?

Attached: 1458310832888.png (1000x1024, 858K)

Change 20 to 80.

Attached: Untitled.png (1000x1024, 858K)

Weebs should get the rope at once

Wrong

easy

Attached: 819191919.jpg (720x737, 54K)

Technically that's not wrong, smartass.

xD 2d girl better than real gurl!

Guess again
Umm no sweetie

20! > 30

28>38

Attached: FA02EAE6-5455-4E67-A42F-564311FBC4A3.jpg (567x559, 205K)

>Noooo you can't go with 2D women, Stacey needs your car, home and money while she rides Chad's dick right now!!

Attached: 1555670322717.png (785x731, 201K)

2d is good to remember the good old days where we can have sex with children without much lash backs.

Correct! Next one is ez

Attached: 1549342389145.png (937x914, 439K)

We did it Reddit!

1

>Well, can you Jow Forums?
>FA02EAE6-5455-4E67-A42F-5(...).jpg

Attached: soy.gif (800x371, 193K)

Yeah, fuck you too. If the quiz has an obvious passable solution, the existence of some "smarter" solution doesn't make it wrong. Irl an okay answer now is always better than the perfect solution next week.

1

i would marry Stacy, live together and pretend we are roomates.
we occasionally have sex while our finances are handled by Chad.
She also works as a whore part time, making good money.
On days we will go travel overseas with the whore money, and secure our future

It’s incorrect simply because more boxes were used that required, not because equation isn’t correct

something something 2d animu gurl xdd

there u go, 1 box

Attached: greater.png (1000x1024, 648K)

Ah yes, SEAsian romance.

4 were required, 4 were used.

Let's try a harder one. No cheating.

Low iq individual

Attached: 4gT0I.jpg (1200x960, 113K)

You have to use 4.

I hate weaboos so fucking much lads

Make it 28>-30

It has nothing to do with iq, you retard. You're just smug autist that suck at this even more than in life.

Attached: IMG_20190513_214149.png (937x914, 427K)

lol ok

Attached: 1557592717647.png (419x248, 66K)

My bad, looked like he used 6 for a second

>On days we will go travel overseas with the whore money, and secure our future
doesn't sound so bad

36

I believe that there are girls who will love you throughout marriage and never cheat on you, but what about men?
Yea its possible too.
Using the theory that all girls are naturally sluts, I'd rather marry a prostitute who earns more than most university graduates.
She has to be caring enough to let me be a NEET at home, while she fucks other man to make a living for us.
I'll most likely get a job to not be useless too.
Then with our excessive income we can travel round the world, have babies if we really want it.
Our financial well being secured by her customers in sex.

Attached: easy mode.jpg (1080x419, 188K)

VERY low iq individual

Attached: zZ86SqQg.jpg (728x586, 37K)

20 > 8.0

22

Keep trying anons

8

Attached: ascension.jpg (1254x1080, 1M)

EZ

Attached: 1557764843361.png (1000x1024, 679K)

An easy one in the meantime

Attached: VLhLG33.png (1000x1024, 687K)

Are you literally retarded or you are 12 yr old?

23 cm2

the shit is older than you

19^2+19^2=c^2

19 duh.

How? And why?

26cm^2

This one is a trick right? You can't have a right equilateral triangle.

You would have to deal with her fucking other men.
To me that is not much, I will treat her like a sister.
I rather have a roomate or someone to live with that isn't too much of a deadweight than live alone.
Its always better to have someone else in the house than in isolation, though some prefer the loneliness.
Sometimes I will have sex with her(wife), other times hooking up with other girls (I'm an autist so I don't think I can).
People would be so jealous of us that my wife is bringing in an average of $5000 per month or so, less if unlucky.

What is the point of the guide markers if you can't make isosceles triangles by connecting them

28cm^2?

At first I thought that you just have to related the areas of the trapezoids via the shared sides however reverse googling suggests that it is a simple ratio problem, but I don't have a rigorous proof for it being a simple ratio problem.

This is correct.

It can't be anything other than 20, the box is just drawn poorly

Using the area of a quadrilateral in terms of diagonals

32+16-20 = 28