nah i said "CRYPTO" currency, and ripples just as good about as crypto as runescape gp
Xavier Sanders
BTC
Joseph Ramirez
eth 0xbtc
Jaxson Walker
>Vericoin (VRC) >ongoing project since 2014 >$10m mcap, 30 million circulating >binary chain with store-of-value Verium (VRM)
Austin Moore
tfw hodling dogecoin since 2014
Connor Butler
i bet you can't even define cryptocurrency >thinks reddcoin is real >thinks bch can't be 51% attacked because of an algorithm top fucking kek. This place is better than plebbit for lulz
Nimiq, the bitcoin 2.0 which actually lets u pay for things
Caleb Kelly
what about LTC? I know they go the lightning route but they said (Charlie) that they would raise the block size if capacity reaches 50%.
Ok also 51% attack possible
Ian Lee
>Digibyte
It's ruined. Devs dumped their bags now it's a ghost crypto.
Christopher Phillips
Also only Monero has a good name. Ffs google some old greek egyptian monetary terms and use that as a name. Wtf is a digibyte...
Julian Williams
anyone with the slightest knowledge on bitcoin mining, knows you're an idiot, so im not even gonna bother with you
Cooper Diaz
link to that? pretty interesting i hate that its centralised around that annoying turd, though. i used to like litecoin, a lot but its community is so cancerous and retarded that i gave up with the entire coin
Camden Rodriguez
>gets called out >I'm just going to ignore you because everyone knows [abstract unclear claim] so fucking pathetic
Why are you so stupid and ugly, mentally and physically damaged both here and in reality? I have literally never seen you post anything remotely intelligent, original or funny here. All you do is shit up the place with you 8 syllable sentences and let everyone know it was indeed you who dropped that turd of a "thought" on this board. Thanks to you I have started to advocate for euthanasia to be accessible without any specific reason to everyone, so you could freely end your existence on this planet, because you will NEVER EVER find happiness nor wealth with your cruel handicaps. Everyone wishes you were dead, ESPECIALLY your family, nobody loves you and nobody likes the idea of having deranged cripple who only produces debt, misery and uncertainty in their family. They might never say it out loud but everytime they look at you they wish you would die already and would stop being a baggage of depression to them. Maybe you think you are strong just by virtue of existing - but you couldn't be more wrong, the people around you tolerating your existence, the family of yours who carries you as an emotional and financial burden, the doctors pointlessly trying to cure you, THEY are strong. You however, are just a rotting, retarded waste of oxygen and protein. Do one good and brave thing and end the suffering for them and for you. Kill yourself.
i fail to see how devs dumping their bags could possibly be a bad thing.
its decentralised which means other people can just become the devs. is it currently fully functional? yes, so whats the problem? FTR: i have 0 dgb.
i hate the word "monero". digibyte is okay... i think zcash has a better name. bean cash is actually a really cool name, as beans have been used as currency before, and theres idioms which use the term "bean" to refer to currency already. i suppose the greatest problem with bean cash's branding is that no one can take the mascot seriously
keep swearing, and acting hard on Jow Forums, youll continue to earn loads of respect from me, you go girl
William King
there isn't a single profanity in my post while there are several in yours. That's called projection my buddy
idiot, it pumps in cycles, you'd have made more by not doing that
Lucas Wright
Monero is good. Bitcoin is good. For small cap I would say Masari is good. Coins with reason to exist are good. Tokens have no reason to exist, other than to separate idiots from their money
Can someone tell me if KORE is worth a shit? It’s privacy based on onion routing, proof of stake with a fork coming that hybridizes to become pos/pow. It has a wallet with a tor browser. Currently cheap as fuck, but every time I look at their ANN page I wonder if they are for real or not. Their discord is active and I want to believe that their coin is a long term hold. It I can help but feel like they will be gone if their fork doesn’t prop the coin price back up.
Ryder Hill
NANO is the best cryptocurrency ever created. No other protocol is so efficient at transfering and preserving value. It has no inflation, no fees, and is instant. Network only breaks if 1 dude gets 51% of the tokens (impossible). Buying at this lvl is like buying bitcoin in 2011
Which finally lands Bitcoin Gold on 0.02455% of Bitcoin Cash in terms of security.
What I'm saying is, sure you need only *11% of BTCs hashrate to 51% attack BCH right now. However Bitcoin Gold does not even have half a percent of Bitcoin Cash's hashrate. Just because Gold was attacked it doesn't mean that Cash will be, you would need to consume 4000 times more electricity to ATTEMPT a 51% attack on Bitcoin Cash (plus hardware of course).
Even if someone could provide that, at that point you'd make way more money to just spend the hashrate on mining BCH like normal. You'd get half the block rewards every single day. Besides, a double spend attack is an attempt, if it fails you would have wasted your double spend money, which would need to be a very big sum to make it worth while attacking rather than just mine normally.
It's btw unlikely for several miners to band together from BTC and try to attack BCH. First of all it would involve trust among parties. Second, any time they spend attacking BCH is time not spent mining BTC normally. Third, if BCH is proved vulnerable at this point it would damage BTC's reputation among people that are not tech savvy. All they will hear is that the same code that BTC is running on is apparently vulnerable, they won't understand the hashrate difference.
*I should mention that in theory you only need to move 5.5% of BTC's hashrate over to BCH to be able to attempt a double spend attack. This is because you decrease the required hashrate to profit on BTC while increasing it on BCH, in theory this might push miners over from BCH to BTC which eventually leaves you with half the hashrate on BCH since so many miners switched over to the now-more-profitable BTC blockchain. Still, this theoretical situation is only true for existing BTC miners (those that stand to benefit the most if there are two blockchains to mine on), if someone new wants to attack BCH he will still need 11% of BTC's hashrate. To get a feeling of how big the attacking miner would be, estimates in 2015 show that all of Google's (non-ASIC) servers could only produce 1% of BTC's hashrate and BTC's hashrate has increased 100 fold since then. ccn.com/bitcoin-100-times-powerful-google/ blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate?timespan=all