Why did these countries fight to the death when they're basically all the same?
Apart from the Muslim one.
Why did these countries fight to the death when they're basically all the same?
Nicholas Torres
Other urls found in this thread:
Thomas Parker
Because none of them is strong enough to conquer the rest.
Oliver Martinez
low iq
see
Sebastian Young
But why fight anyway
Jackson Cook
>lets just pretend the american intervention never happened
Luis Martin
Because instead of living in a spirit of European brotherhood, the jews have convinced them that they are different and hate each other.
Nicholas Brown
>when the Jews simultaneously promote the destruction of nationalism through assimilation into european superstates and the destruction of superstates under divisive nationalism
Grayson Davis
Landgrab after the ottoman collapse
David Price
Levi Price
See these chimps?
Cant tell.em.apart but they fight because they are by nature savages
Jordan Flores
You think Hungary's better than the rest of the places you highlighted?
Robert Collins
low intelligence
there is absolutely no need for a croatian nation or non country like kosovo, but they dont understand
Brody Flores
Serbian diaspora
Daniel Scott
Yugoslavia almost included Bulgaria and Albania. Would have been BASTE
Jace Lopez
Kosovo will be united with Albania.
Joseph Allen
USA and Mexico should be 1 country.
Camden Jenkins
>when they're basically all the same
>British education
Kevin Cruz
centuries and centuries of warfare bred distrust. only a foreign force could rule the region united.
Benjamin Collins
t. albanoid
Jacob Ross
>Apart from the Muslim one.
Wow ok
Justin Perez
Because during T*to's time the idiot emphasized on how different they are, splitting hairs to find anything that made then even slightly different. The Turbocapitalism employed in Yugoslavia also made sure that it looked like one group was gaining on the back of others thus driving the wedge even further in.
Also, Slavs.
Brandon Nelson
Are we talking about the American intervention of 1917 or 1941 or 1991?
Daniel Ward
>Because during T*to's time the idiot emphasized on how different they are, splitting hairs to find anything that made then even slightly different.
>During the Titoist era, a Yugoslav socialist patriotism was advocated by the Yugoslav government. It stressed that this socialist patriotism was not related to nationalism. The League of Communists of Yugoslavia denounced nationalism, declaring that "every nationalism is dangerous". Yugoslav leader Josip Broz Tito sought to form a communist community of "new people" of socialist Yugoslavia, based on the concept of Brotherhood and Unity
Michael Walker
This but unironically.
>youtube.com
Aaron Bailey
Serbia
/thread
Lucas Martin
This. Would be a pretty calm and developed place if it weren't for Serbian power fantasies
Luis Jackson
quintessential amerimutt post
Austin Rogers
There is your answer brainlet, instead of building a common Yugoslav national identity the idiot put emphasis on a multi-culti "brotherhood and unity" ideal little different from AH. We are not even speaking on a theoretical level here since his "patriotic socialism" was a living contradiction and has already backfired.
Elijah Clark
You are the idiot, during the first yugoslavia king Alexander tried to erase boundaries between ethnicities with made-up states, it only built up resentment.
Ethan Collins
how many hours can you go without thinking about hungary?
Bentley Wilson
europe had free time to develop and got shitton of help, balkans didn't
Landon White
Fuck alb*nians nothing you say is good
Jose Allen
>i do not understand the balkan climate, the post.
Colton Richardson
t.let me tell you where you live
Colton Davis
dank mem3
Camden Price
varg with the facts