Is chainlink a meme? What are the actual chances of them partnering with SWIFT...

>We work with Banking Technology Leaders like SWIFT, helping connect banks to smart contracts with Enterprise Grade Oracles.
How is this lawyer talk? They explicitly state that they are working with swift. If you have trouble understanding this sentence I cannot help you.

why do I even bother with brainlets

Attached: Screenshot_2018-08-04 Chainlink.png (552x720, 57K)

>We work with Banking Technology Leaders like SWIFT, helping connect banks to smart contracts with Enterprise Grade Oracles.

Give me a source for this accusation.

have you idiots learned about fake it till you make it? Why do you think sergey name drops swift every chance he gets? people do lie in the world

Your eyeballs, how do you not see the writing on the wall

Attached: 1533342785805.png (680x681, 158K)

you cant just slap a logo on your site wily nilly you dumb shit

Not invited to sibos 2018
SWIFT kept their proof of concept and are now doing their own project
Link btfo Lmao

you can if you won a contest last year. You can stretch the truth about why you have that logo on your site. Do you guys even know how business works behind the scenes?

“Like Swift”... so another mom and pop shop company that competes against Swift...it’s like Swift

>like SWIFT
how are you not seeing lawyer speak right here? Like does not mean swift.

the devs hold over 60% of the total supply, you really think that's a good investment?

Attached: 1517960773072.jpg (240x250, 7K)

meant for you

lel deluded fudders. yes it means SWIFT

It's common knowledge that they work with SWIFT, perhaps they use the word "like", because they work with multiple companies that provide banking services.

Implying you can straight up lie about a partnership and not get dicked by their lawyers.

No one wants to build their own in house oracles. Same as they don't want to build their own blockchain. They'll use whatever everybody else is using, whether that's ethereum or hyperledger. They'll use whatever oracle solution is most popular.

Lmao. Last time someone used common knowledge in a thread anons dispelled the myth that Szabo gave the domain to sergey.

There is no such thing as common knowledge in crypto much less Link

Yeah I’ve thought about this. NDA’s don’t make sense either with open source projects so to me it all seems like a lark.

Most of crypto is open source, or pretends to be. There's still ndas everywhere.

>get dicked by their lawyers.
you only get dicked by lawyers if someone cares enough or has enough resources to fuck you over back. So yes you can straight up lie. I personally know a guy that lied about a 3million dollar contract and got away with it. he lied about his credentials but still performed. If idiots actually ran your own business you would know how shit really works

not to mention Jow Forums is notorious for being a place to dupe people with mass propaganda campaigns

i have a feeling sergay has been paying people to shil here since day one.

the name of the game is how to trick idiots to move there money into your account

Because starting a huge project like this from scratch would cost much more than just using Link's infrastructure.

Link will be $555 EOY!

The domain thing was a complete conspiracy theory, don't even dare compare it to this...
It's pretty obvious they're working with SWIFT, when ISO 20022 would directly benefit from oracles.
People keep bringing up that SC won a contest, so they were invited to Sibos 17 purely for that reason... Bullshit. They demonstrated a proof of concept, which if I recall correctly was successful.
They've also said that they only have one chance to launch a successful mainnet, because large players are involved.

Link had multiple hundred million dollar market cap at one point. Surely the swift partnership was a contributing factor. If it had been false this entire time you can be damn sure they'd have been sued.

The only thing Link has going for itself is that they’re vague as shit.

>What are the actual chances of them partnering with SWIFT?
100% They literally already are.

Totally, nano ftw. 200 eoy

ok buddy. Go on the slack and ask rory to confirm 100% without a doubt they have a partnership with SWIFT. i want to do it myself but they wont let me into the slack

I wonder why

Attached: 1533414515105.jpg (229x221, 11K)

>Totally, nano ftw. 200 eoy
The absolute state. Pack it up boys, thats the thread.

Attached: 1528853322091.png (1592x1548, 430K)

i mean they have it on their website right shouldn't be a problem for him to do it

there is also a video of sergey saying they work with swift, it was a presentation with three other blockchain developers, does anyone have it?

>illiterate pajeet not allowed in slack
What a shocker.

Are you implying no one has done this? Do you have proof that they actually denied the partnership at any point? Since it's been plastered over their website for a year.

> Sibos
This year they’re not invited

>because large players are involved.

That’s what everyone says... then they hide under “nda”. Don’t you think if there were many big players, someone from There would have leaked something by now.

>website
Goes to show how linkies will far for anything that resembles a dot and two lines to keep their ideas alive

You are trying so hard to not see what is right in front of you. You're being lobbed a home run pitch and even taking a swing like the cuck you are.

Attached: D033083D-F323-40FD-A018-22FAB628F936.png (600x842, 142K)

if they confirmed it we would have had 20 threads every day with screen cap saying they did. i haven't seen that. I have only seen every other pizza gate tier connection people try to make

go on the slack and ask rory.

See pic.

On the left is a Swift press release on ISO 20022, showing a number of key examples of ISO 20022 implementation.
On the right is the description for Sergey's Sibos 2017 presentation.

Swift considers Sergey's PoC to be a key example of ISO 20022 implementation.

Attached: Swift press release smart contracts 2.png (1672x722, 254K)

I don't see why someone confirming it on Slack would be different to explicitly stating it on their website.

There's (old) videos of Sergey saying they're working with Microsoft. I'm sure they won't confirm that, but it's out there, and it makes perfect sense. The guy who introduces Sergey even accidentally calls him Aleksey (name of another Russian dude working on Microsoft's Cryplets).

No wonder you're not allowed in slack you're asking stupid questions about things that are plainly stated on their fucking website

it's different because every time SWIFT get brought up by sergay he says shit like this LIKE SWIFT
he doesn't say swift. we have been discussing this in the thread this whole time. Where have you been? if its on his website he can come out and confirm it. Why doesn't he?

this is a legit question when it comes to peopls money fuckwit. I should just trust idiots on Jow Forums though. you know because they know how to use photoshop and trick people all the fucking time

Checked.
Bunch of hearsay. That’s their plan: name drop just enough information and let peoples imaginations run off into the wild.

The fact that this money grubbing gook is willing to work for 7.25 LINK an hour should tell you all you need to know

Attached: qerfgqeg.png (227x326, 27K)

>if its on his website he can come out and confirm it.
He puts it on the website and literally says he's working with Swift in his talks.
Fuck is wrong with your brain?

>let peoples imaginations run off into the wild.
the whole crypto space is this. But link is different though because a bunch of people made collages with clipped articles and posts them over and over. That makes it 100% legit

Checked.

link sauce

But I bet if you ask any of the team members, they won't explicitly say they're partnered and working with swift. Can you point to a statement like that from a team member? I don't remember any.

lol that's a lie

No faith in her. She has middle school tier projects.

and they won't. Every time it comes up they do lawyer bullshit. Watch how they choose their words very carefully

If you're gonna analyze the language being used, I can't really argue with you. The fact that they add the word "like" before SWIFT doesn't mean it doesn't include swift. The logo next to this message is SWIFT's intellectual property, they'd most certainly get sued for misusing it like that.

Explicitly saying
>We are working with Microsoft
isn't exactly name dropping IMO. Perhaps Sergey slipped up and said it even though he wasn't supposed to.

I agree, crypto is about speculation. So are most other forms of investment. You invest early because you think something is brewing, if you end up being right it pays off. With a lot of sources on chainlink's potential partnerships I'm willing to bet we're right. The loss is miniscule compared to the potential gains to be had.

I'm dealing with pure unfettered delusion here.
Stop replying to me you cuck.

That would certainly explain the ridiculously high valuation!

He says 'the swift chainlink' multiple times in a video but I'm too much of a brainlet to figure out all the implications

youtube.com/watch?v=ytv8U0bejPA
Around 46 minute mark, I believe.

He literally says it here, this is from Telegram.

Attached: 9F6D86CA-4FD0-4206-A402-11ECDA5282F3.png (750x1334, 707K)

>Logo
Wouldn’t be misused or sued since you can use other a trademark to show that your product or service meets their business. Say you wanted to do landscaping for Airbnb hosts, you can use Airbnb logos without their approval.

>Microsoft
That wasn’t a slip-up he says it intentionally and then uses the word “cryplets”

>speculation
Yes. It’s all this until one real and solid confirmation comes about.

Kys

Attached: 1526999485938.png (2048x2048, 1.68M)

Rory said they do in the past. I don't have a screenshot though.

what does relationship mean?

Retarded. They were probably having a conversation with Rajeesh. What does Rajees know.

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

Attached: sir gay.png (680x443, 227K)

A good thinking user. Maybe they sent them an email, thus a relationship. It’s a play on words.

sure, faggot :)

Attached: 1533410093688.jpg (3661x2048, 1.55M)

i have a relationship with you right now because we are having a conversation. Right?

no, you literally dont

Attached: 0c5.png (228x217, 74K)

They’re getting China hustled... anons getting China Hustled

i could like and say we do, because we post on the same board. And it would be half true because i could say it was. Then desperate people could make connections that are there. Those same people could take screen caps and make collages "proving" we do and post them all over the internet

FUDDERS BTFO
listen guys, this has to stop, you had 8 months to accumulate

>this mental gymnastics

Attached: 740.jpg (850x1044, 149K)

What does partnership mean?

But yeah, obviously they don't want to explicity state it for some reason.

I still suspect that LINK is swift's coin though, and that Sergey is just the face of the project to swindled goyim into thinking that it's not a jewish creation.

Oh here we go with another bullshit pasta from the cyber-techno machinations pajeet. Fuck off with your shit idiot.

Talking with pajeet who doesn't have a clue

false.
>"we partner with companies LIKE swift"

but thats whats happening here. These are the same gymnastics that are happening with link. do you not see the point im making?

no thats what literally has nothing to do with the word relationship. You asked for proofs, and proofs are not enough suddenly for you

Attached: 1514682992346.jpg (721x960, 73K)

>cryplets
Speaking of -lets, are you a brainlet? ChainLink is middleware. Other companies, such as Microsoft, will use it to power "their" oracle solution, even though under the hood it's still chainlink, and runs on LINK tokens.

name even one time an NDA was involved with crypto. ill wait.

>logo
>like swift

Attached: E75E8E68-7D8C-4B1A-A8EC-C552A0C60D79.png (1184x1196, 1.98M)

verge hype and then namedropping pornhub.

I don't know why we're feeding these retards. Let them miss out. Next time I see a thread like this I'll pretend to have 65 IQ and join their side to scare off complete morons like himself.

>"a relationship"
it's over. there's unironically no partnership

It's funny because biz probably thinks you're wrong but you're 100% right. Why the fuck would a fortune 500 Co choose to run NEET nodes over trusted partners or other major conglomerates? They would pay a premium for the name brand over the NEET nodes because it will still save them millions over current systems.
>muh linkpool
That shit didn't even sell out despite being open for a month or more. And also the 25% fee is retarded. Big companies can replicate that too for a fraction of the cost.

It’s how biz operate these days anons

Brainlet. Because i don’t agree with the half baked speculation there is. Don’t give me a turkey sandwich when there is no turkey involved.

>Maybe they sent them an email, thus a relationship. It’s a play on words.
thats literally how YOU operate user

If you did even an ounce of research, you'd see how the projects tie in to one another, and if you had any common sense you'd also understand that Sergey wouldn't be helping a competitor. Clearly they're collaborating. Then again since you have a PhD in Language Analysis, I guess the word "collaborate" instead of "partnership" will rustle your jimmies. This is my final reply, go do reserach or keep being skeptical, I don't give a fuck.

they own link 100%, they just want to keep the price low for now. This has to end someday because there will always be some new fag retard who want to fud because he hasnt had enough time

so let me ask you. Are we deluded for believing what link is saying or am i deluded for questioning sergey using lawyer speak every chance he gets?

user. Have you worked with tech startups before ? That’s the game they run all the time. All we’re saying is to think and look at the roses before you pick them up, because some of them have thorns. (Yeah that sounded gay, but maybe it resembles your way of thinking)

I got triple digits. Fuck You. Kek