Why are Bongs afraid of inanimate objects?

Why are Bongs afraid of inanimate objects?

Attached: 1557966257364m.jpg (823x1024, 108K)

Lel. I just throw spare bullets that get lost into a drawer and be done with it. Why do they need to be in "safe storage"?

>haha look at this pathetic bong being concerned with gun safety
great thread

>tf
>tp

Attached: Kinder_Surprise_1000_0001.jpg (1000x870, 113K)

>Why do they need to be in "safe storage"?

Attached: 1515601790411.png (500x500, 164K)

>a bullet on the ground
>"BLIMEY we got voiolence 'ere!"
Lmao, just throw it in the trash. A .22 is a glorified BB.

I think a lot of European have leftover trauma from WWI+WWII

>gun safety
It's a single fucking .22 cartridge.

>Lmao, just throw it in the trash

Attached: 1512742184113.png (534x363, 91K)

I have 30mm Flak on my desk

fight me UKucks

You do know live rounds don't need a gun to go off right? A serious knock to them, like a car running over it, could set it off.

oh the humanity lol

This. This is a dangerous situation. What if someone picks it up and ot explodes their hand?

>"but it might go off"
I used to work at UPS. we shipped cases of ammo all the time. They don't go off if you put them in a trailer in blistering heat or even if you drop them. And UPS is NOT gentle with your packages; there's a good chance it has been beaten to shit by the time it gets to you.
Also, I just got a thousand 9mm rounds delivered to my doorstep. The package was nice and intact.

I think it's less "there's a single bullet on the ground" and more "why the fuck is there a bullet on the ground in the middle of a busy area in a nominally gun-free country". Probably something harmless but the rozzers might be able to track someone who's been carrying a gun through the central city if they can get some CCTV footage.
>why do they care though
Because it's either tied to someone who goes shooting recreationally or gang activity. If the former then no problem, if the latter then maybe they'll stop a shooting before it happens

what if a guy accidentally kicks the bullet and it flies directly into the heart of an innocent bystander?

This Brit is a hero

holy shit are you trolling

The police could better use their resources stopping that bloke sticking a spoon in the other chap's jugular

Just because UPS are retards doesn't make it not true. When faced with the choice of "lets take an extra minute to make sure this round doesn't spontaneously go off and kill someone" or "lol just throw it in the garbage", obviously you should pick the first.

Yeah, imagine how annoying it would be if Jow Forums made the same fucking threads about your country day after day, year after year. Just imagine.

When will this meme die, they've been legal for years.

Dude, bullets don't just spontaneously discharge. You need to deliberately strike the primer.

>lets take an extra minute to make sure this round doesn't spontaneously go off and kill someone

Attached: 484784874220.png (211x239, 4K)

>anti-American sentiments
>based on facts
How new are you to Jow Forums?

>.22
careful, I head those can sometimes pierce human skin lmao

Attached: laughing.jpg (912x905, 96K)

They bounce around in your skull too!

A 22 basically goes off with the force of a handgrenade if the casing is pierced or deformed, spraying shrapnel up to half a mile.
This is because the gunpowder is so compressed.

>be me
>have to go to court
>wearing a blazer
>at court entrance remove blazer, belt, phone, keys, etc., and place in tote to go through X-ray machine
>walk through metal detector
>waiting for my toted belongings
>Mountie: "Sir, are you aware there is a .22 bullet in your coat?"
>"No I was not aware. Is it just a shell?"
>"No, it's the entire projectile"
>Takes us 5+ minutes and 2 more scans through the x-ray to find the bullet in the blazer's lining
>"Sorry about that officer"
>"Oh, no worries, it's no problem we just have to throw it out"
>"Thanks"

This was on the 14th, I still have no idea why it was there, I have a 22 but I have never worn a blazer while shooting that I can recall, unless I was drunk.
Mfw it's an unstructured blazer and I have thrown it into the washer and dryer a dozen times or more while a 22 round was in it

Attached: 1482515842294.jpg (337x372, 23K)

>they've been legal for years.
No they haven't. They still aren't.

If you had been in UK you would be on trial for possessing a WMD

They kind of are, see Choco Treasure--the better version of Kinder Egg where kids cannot choke on

Attached: images (1).jpg (268x188, 7K)

You do know that a cartridge is completely harmless without a bolt to lock it in place, a chamber to support the casing and a barrel to give the projectile velocity, right? Right?

They are illegal in the US, they either sell a kinder joy egg where the treat and toy are completely separate, or one of the Americanised eggs from another company made legal in the US by not fully encasing the toy's egg container in chocolate.

Regard pic, left is kinder surprise, middle kinder joy, right Americanised version of kinder surprise

Attached: PicsArt_05-18-07.41.20.jpg (640x210, 40K)

the 22 stands for 22 bullits per second

That's not true, when I did my hunter safety course a guy in his 40s (the rest of us were around 12) got kicked out because he fired a 22 rimfire with his car keys on our break just by fucking around. You obviously can't aim it but you can fire it

>Why do they need to be in "safe storage"?
As evidence, you fucking idiot.

>Lmao, just throw it in the trash
Absolutely fucking genius.
The UK isn't like your backwards shithole where people can walk into a Wallmart and buy guns and ammo. Police have a habit of holding onto found and reported objects which may or may not have been involved in unlawful or unsafe business.
It may come as a shock to learn that a local cop shop doesn't have to be a defacto death squad used for keeping the poor away from the rich.

I dont know what the fuck Brits are gonna do after civilization collapses lmao. They will probably get invaded

>They kind of
No. That's a completely different product. There is no "kind of", the children's chocolate in question is still contraband.

You can still eat shitty chocolate in the shape of an egg with a shitty toy inside tho.

>b-b-but
Have sex, loser

I'm sure they can get plenty of advice from their American mates, since you guys have been living out the whole societal collapse deal for generations.

the kinder eggs that we have here are different than those
why are you seething
have you considered having sex

>You can still
No you can't.

but theres no gun....

I do have sex thats why I dont give a crap about muh candies for fuckling babies

Advice #1: Stop crying like baby and running to the cops every time you see a bullet

you better get The Government to bubble wrap all the sharp edges in public too. Each exposed corner from tables to buildings is a death trap waiting to go off. Raise taxes to pay for it, surely people can't handle themselves.

Yeah wtf, that extra minute should be used for arresting dangerous jaywalkers

1.) There has never been a total collapse of global civilisation, it would be silly to make laws and purchases based on the idea that one might occur in the next century

2.) UK has few animals anyway, especially if everyone has to hunt, it's not like they could hunt to feed themselves with guns. Fishing tackle and a boat would be a much smarter investment

3.) What are you going to do with your 30.06, .Glock 40, and AR, against one of the thousands of people in America that will have access to APCs, tanks, machine guns, demolitions, etc. in the event of a societal collapse?

4.) No matter how far civilisation falls the Brits will at least be able to spell the word civilisation correctly.

Attached: 1529365775597.jpg (598x415, 60K)

Fucking fudds, I swear. Without a bolt, the bullet is not going anywhere, since it's heavier than the casing. Action, equal and opposite reaction, remember? Without the support of a chamber, the casing cannot handle the forces exerted upon it by the gunpowder and will burst. There is a theoretical possibility that some shrapnel would end up in someone's eye, but a .22 doesn't have enough oomph in it to accomplish that. Even if the cartridge was contained in a chamber and blocked off by a bolt, it still wouldn't be lethal as the kinetic energy released by the ignition of gunpowder would escape in every direction arond the bullet instead of propelling it straight forward if you didn't have a barrel.

TLDR: you need a gun to make a cartridge dangerous.

It's almost like tables and buildings serve a purpose while firearms are nothing but a useless hazard.

Well to me that sounds like a city where every single city has gang warfare equal to that of London's but I'll take your word for it.

1. Roman empire - you cant hide behind the 'global' term because tech wasnt advanced enough to explore the entire globe
2. irrelevant
3. if you probably wont win you shouldnt try fallacy
4.irrelevant

Your arguments don't work better by using a Canadian flag. Yank posting is too distinct to hide behind a proxy

to the uneducated each bullet is a rocket waiting to go off

good boy, yes, you keep relying on the goverrnement to keep food on the supermarket shelves. see how that goes. lmao

I see what you meant now, yes, it's not very dangerous without the gun

not an argument

they are cucks

Thank you finland. I learned something today!

It goes very well, even in the middle of world wars food still makes its way to the supermarkets and I already explained how a fishing rod would be more useful than a gun in the UK.

Better on the floor than in your kids.

Based Finland. Watch everyone avoid this comment.

Limeys are pussies

1. Doesn't mean it won't or can't happen
2. Why not both?
3. >thousands of people in America have APCs and explosives
>Doubt.jpg
>implying those with APCs and explosives can be everywhere at once
>implying those would even be useful for survival
4. Irrelevant

>america is like a 90's FPS with ammunition just lying around on the floor

pretty cool ngl