Too many altcoins with problems

What altcoins should I get, I've been looking for good ones buy these listed ones have shitty problem so I don't want to touch them.

>ICX - Not delivering on their roadmap and founder said they're afraid to finish what they started

>NEO - Centralized and unstable network, also difficulties for developers to build dapps on the platform

>EOS - Centralized and unstable network

>NEBL - No adoption or interest, also shitty basic POS with bit of a high inflation rates at 10%

>QTUM - Outdated with no more proper scaling solutions compared to comptetitors

>NULS - Bascically a chink copy of Lisk

>LSK - Cartel controlling all the voting and Lisk doing nothing about it, also slow development taking ages

>TRX - EOS but worse and with forked EVM

>NAS - Currently centralized with NAS themselves mining all blocks and no interest in adoption. Also their ranking system sucks ass.

>ZIL - Just recently delayed mainnet, JUST

>XRP - centralized shitcoin with the founders holding most of the supply

>LTC - Just a minor improvement over BTC, should be worthless

>STORJ - Their network currently going down and can't scale

>KNC - No one giving a shit about using their decentralized exchange

>NKN - lol selling bandwidth

>Skycoin - Muh new ISP and internet, no one will adopt this

>RLC - needs privacy implment on tasks and more dapps also their token is only used for pahyment which makes it have less value

>AION - TRS and founder release cucking investors every month

>ETHOS - Wallet token useless

>SEELE & QKC - inflation every month or 3

>WAN - Just an ETH fork with muh ring sigs

Attached: 1532943368804.jpg (848x1024, 304K)

I suggest looking into Tendermint / Cosmos. And look into which projects will be utiziling it.

ENG, LINK

sigh, ICX is late yes I give u that, but he was talking about human race, democracy not being achievable in the fullest, nothing at all related to icon zzzzz

must be pretty stressful constantly researching these shitcoins and keeping up with their announcements and roadmaps. DYOR on 0xBTC and you'll never have to sweat about those things again.

pretty spot on user, impressive.

opinion on holochain and bch would interest me user. also monero is solid for sure.

BNB - CZ
CET - Jihan
BCH - Satoshi

These are the only coins you need

ZRX
BNB
XMR
DCR
DOGE
VIA

none. in the current market the only thing you can bank on is ethereum and casper or bitcoin itself. EOS is in third place but not in the same category as eth or bitcoin. everything else is utter shit.

wait for dfinity, radix or kadena. those are your moonshots OP.

Tezos - perfection

AKroma - stopped development on project and started work on DEX project called Kastle.Its in ICO right now

>zrx - there is literally zero need in having the token
>bnb - is market sold by binance themselves...
>xmr - this is good desu but it needs to figure out scaling. its at something like 0.25 tps atm
>dcr - good governence but little usecase outside of that
>doge - ...
>via - just another generic pow coin

lmao. this is literally just a copy-paste of all of eth's code and community projects. they even copied myetherwallet and just changed the name to akroma. utter shitcoin. why would you fall for this?

1 minute block times... are you serious? in 1-2 years its going to be obsolete. though the formal verification is nice. michelson is also quite nice in comparison to the evm but i dont really see the need desu.

the people that developed "the loop" have already moved on to other projects fren.

Tezos isn't perfect, they're self evolving platform. Their scaling right now needs to be fixed, they're DPOS yet they have crappy scaling. Though you can buy Tezos for Binance pump if you think it'll get listed.
I remember mining Akroma and selling that shitcoin on stock exchange.

HOLOCHAIN user????

WTC All-in

Thank me in 3 years

What do you thin about DERO ?

Attached: 1911.png (3000x2961, 923K)

The China Hustle

Attached: 1530446808565.jpg (616x1024, 131K)

She's standing on the moon, that's all the proof I need!

Ark is the chosen one

good question, would be interested in OP's view on both the holochain and the holohoax

1 name please of person who developed the loop and quit?

DOCK - Decentralized LinkedIn with incentives for users, many influencers are on board, small market cap, ONE MILLION USERS ALREADY, imagine what will happen when Suppoman/Teeka shill it

lmao. not everything needs a fucking blockchain you retards.

>RLC - needs privacy implment on tasks and more dapps also their token is only used for pahyment which makes it have less value

This is just about the dumbest, most pajeet written shit I've read.

Holochain is good, its P2P so the network is totally decentralized with the use of Hashes to battle malicous nodes, I think you can take a look at Zeronet and Freenet, they're also doing P2P like Holochain.
But the currency itself Holo fuel is only used on the Holo Application, and for payment purposes only, would be good if there was some kind of incentive to stake or put some out of circulation for added value.

It's not dpos like ark or some other centralized crap. You are fucking retarded and uneducated.
And it's going to use zkstarks.

You already know the answer OP.

thanks. are you invested user?

opinion on nano, iota, dag in general?

So basically ZIL is best because the only downside is a mainnet delay.

Its dpos, I never said it was centralized. It uses randomized dpos for the delegates to mine the blocks. Not sure why you're so mad, maybe because I pointed out a flaw?

Look into JNT. Could be worth it.

Inbefore bags are heavy...every single altcoin is heavy right now

There are currently over 400 individual bakers and that's with most xtz not yet claimed, one month after betanet. Comparing it to dpos chains like eos, lisk, ark is retarded.

Please enlighten me. How is 1 min block time a bad thing? Plus, these things can easily be changed.

Attached: 1520252435238.jpg (680x598, 48K)

I invested in their ICO.
I haven't looked into DAGs too much so I'm not sure about their tech. But from the founder of Kadena said that DAGs can't scale until a certain point due to how their graphs works.
Iota right now is centralized due to the need of their coordinator, I think they're working on myaking it decentralized in the future and Nano has no real incentives to host a node so their network has security issues and Nano is just a currency with no smart contract so not much value there, they're feeless but comes at a security cost.

Listen all I am trying to say is they have crappy scaling at the moment compared to other DPOS blockchains. Its a fact. Tezos puts decentralization over scaling, I imagine they'll work on scaling in the future using their self evolving capabilites.

thanks user. next ones:

bat
xlm
omg
zencash

my opinion:

zencash is trying to be more than a currency but the 51% wasnt a good look

idk about bat, the brave browser is definately gaining adoption though

omg, good idea but nobody knows the staking fees and juns marketing is scammy

xlm, idk. gotta look it up.

also vechain would interest me user

Right. In theory you could run it all on a server like icon does it and call it dpos.
Even though eos is dpos, it sucks compared to my server which also uses dpos.
You didn't have a point because you compared it to dpos with a fixed, small amount of delegators.

And I already said that zkstarks are the future of scaling, not forcing huge blocks that leads to centralization. And guess who invested in starkware? Vitalik and Arthur.

opinions on FCT, SIA ?

Sia, their development is too slow, the community is complaining that Siacoin is focusing too much of their development on the Obelisk ASIC miner and not enough on the platform, also the Obelisk will make mining siacoin POW on GPUs not long viable, I'd imagine investors and miners are leaving.

The platform is bug ridden, which makes hosting nodes drop out and other problems apparently, so thats why people want the sia team to focus more on fixing the platform.

I like siacoin but they need to fix their platform. They're trying to catter to enterprises, like making massive data centers be the ones to be the storage provider which isn't good for decentralization.

Right now I'd rather use something like google drive, drop box or some other centralized cloud storage services and encrypto my files on there instead of using siacoin.

Link, eng, hot, sky, bch, eth, zil, zrx, dero, urbit starz(if more of them ever get sold), icx, nano, amb, rlc, aion, xmr, ark

This is my intended portfolio. Help me diversify by picking how much % of my total assets to allocate to each project

Attached: 1529954296343.webm (720x960, 1.87M)

Just hold Monero

Why not buy 0xBitcoin? No roadmap to fuck up, the token is already complete.

>he still thinks Icon is a good investment

cringe

Attached: komodo.png (200x200, 12K)

because it is a scam

COME BE A HOLOFAG WITH ME

went back to ico so good upside

Attached: 20180805_092513.jpg (797x422, 30K)

>ADA - cardanoroadmap.com
great team and dev process
>ENG
serious project - intel as partner
>LINK
not sure if i should be a true believer but i do hold

Thoughts on Monero an Bitshares?

>muh centralization
Who gives a shit if you're obviously just in it to make a profit anyways? Idiots like you have a natural self-sabotage mechanism to keep you from "making it" and spreading your idiocy to higher rungs of society

check it out and get in before the world outside of China notices it: path.network

it has an ACTUAL utility holy shit what an advanced concept

Attached: path2.png (533x533, 10K)

>NEBL - No adoption or interest, also shitty basic POS with bit of a high inflation rates at 10%

Did you do any research on this at all? It is 10% for full time stakers, the second you send a coin, your staking maturity resets and it takes a full 7 days for it to hit peak maturity (max % of hitting stake) again.

It allows the node structure to be actually decentralized vs the centralization that comes from a DPoS system or Masternodes.

Also YOU ARE NOT THE TARGET MARKET of Neblio. They put their marketing into targeting actual devs/businesses, not pumping their shit to bagholders like TRX, XVG, VET

Monero I like it but don't invest. It had a problem where early last year most likely ASIC was mining monero while it was supposed to be ASIC resistant. They developed an ASIC for monero and mined in secret without telling the public then this year they released their ASIC miner to the public, then monero hard forked. They'll probably make ASIC again to mine Monero.

Bitshares I like it, high throughput with its DPOS voting system. But its DEX is not user friendly and the UI needs working on a whole lot. Seems like a solid investment though.

In practice this means that the inflation rate decreases as adoption increases, and the team estimates that the actual inflation is somewhere between 3-6%

btw I don't invest into monero because if it reached ath in sats it'll only do a x2, I would invest into it if I was a big whale though.

Notice how he omitted VET because it is the true successor of BTC and ETH

>>NKN - lol selling bandwidth

You've clearly never seen a corporate internet bill OP. I've signed invoices for $75,000 for an annual business tarif and half the time the network is idle.

You choose wisely

Attached: ark_explained-912x1342.png (912x1342, 514K)

BCH and XMR

...

Zilliqa is the only one worth something and it just got delayed, nothing good goes for crypto this year

>ADA - likely to late

buy quant network

Based

Someone FUD me on GVT im about to go all in.

RLC is using intels SGX for privacy correct and they also have staking which should help slow token velocity.

27% of my portfolio is in NXS. Anytime I bring it up, not much fud

that's because no one has ever heard of it.