I-Is 20k LINK enough to make it?

1k is enough to make it.

yes, fren.
if you can hold long enough, you could improve your life with 524 link

I live in a shithoole so suicide insurance might be enough

To make it to the other side?
Not sure if I would kill myself over $5k.

I bought 38 LINK today just so I can ride the train.

Attached: 1532202983428.png (972x469, 32K)

693 now. the ride never ends.

so many name fags on Jow Forums man it kinda kills the mood.

This is Jow Forums guys not reddit cmon now. There is no special points to get we are all just anons.

>t. reddit spacer

Amount to make it/sell price = # of linkies you need

1,000,000 / 50 = 20,000

You need 300k LINK to make it

Can't buy link for 14 days. Will I miss the train?

Will most likely be .40 and up by then, sorry.

None of you are gonna make it with link.Period

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data APIs through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

Attached: itsnotfuditsjustadud.png (278x276, 35K)

The use of chainlink might come from a startup who is looking to disrupt a particular market by using new technology.

>replying to pasta
thestate.pdf

What is his endgame? When chainlink reaches the 3000 mark he will be the first trillionaire in the world. What he plans to accomplish with his limitless wealth?

Attached: 1533668046488.jpg (617x507, 38K)

Even in death this LINK Marine maintained his honor.

Attached: CLS.jpg (660x371, 51K)

He will have a monopoly on the fast food industry

i just need chainlink reach $200 nothing more

Should I buy LIKK or HOT to be extremely rich? I've got 100k sats on Binance so I'm not poor

HOT

Shit I obviously meant LINK
Thanks

Hot

buy HOTLINKs

Plz retire this pasta asap

Why not both?

Only have 1000, don't matter if I dont makeit, just want a little speed bump.