How cucked are your cunt's armed forces?
How cucked are your cunt's armed forces?
I dont think it can get more cucked than the us military
>pic
Most of that seems pretty sensible. You can't have white nationalism in your non-white armed forces for your non-white country.
>that hard emphasis on jews and muslims
Does this sort of shit get passed around in the US Army?
"Look out for individuals who describe themselves as patriots" and it just went downhill from there...
Is it not accurate though?
>Add ‘istan’ to British place names
kek
It is, I don’t know what’s wrong with that chart. It describes the kind of posts you see on Jow Forums to a T.
Maybe a few are debatable but yeah, a lot of those are pretty blatant red flags
It didn't though.
The cuckoldry in this picture is too much, I love it
Some are legitimate claims against racist individuals, the rest is clearly an opressive totalitarian aproach against those who refuse to accept the current mass immigration agenda and the islamophiliac attitude of the media and goverment.
Oh, and a forced race mixing (Not thjat it should be illegal or anything, but forcing it and attacking homgenous communities is clearly unacceptable as well)
It is mostly accurate which is why Jow Forums users are triggered by it.
Don't know why some things are considered Extreme Right Wing, like describing yourself as a patriot, social media one, or the PC one.
It's entirely inaccurate to the point that it seems fabricated for trolling purposes.
ISIS members aren't allowed to join the military. Why should Jow Forums users? Seems fair.
This post's content could be added to that chart tbqh.
Why would Jow Forums be triggered by it? They openly admit they're extreme right wing.
>It's entirely inaccurate
Cope.
a lot of it could be said jokingly, and saying youre a patriot isnt a bad thing
Are you playing XRW bingo over there or something?
But patriotisme is why people join the armed forces
no?
you join the army to kill people legally
>mostly americans
>mostly mexicans in reality
sounds about right
No, it's pretty much
>If you complain about islam, immigrants, or anything about government censorship you're far right
As if a lot of this doesn't apply to the far left too. You know who else is opposed to neoliberal globalization and organized religions? Leftists.
It's about 75% accurate.
Hey Jow Forums if you don't want to get treated like terrorists stop committing acts of terror.
I think it's because our armed forces have shit their pants recently after is was revealed some soldiers had links to a proscribed terrorist organisation (NA) who had other members plotting to kill an MP.
He's a newfag, user
>Jow Forums as if it's a monolithic entity or ever has been
Fuck off newfag
Oh god those guys.
>forced race mixing
Race mixing isn’t even touched upon in that chart. Stop projecting your complexes.
you can make generalizations just like with races
Indeed. Not only is it unacceptable that their opressive totalitarian aproach should be critisized, but is far more unnacceptable to allow the diffusion of contradictory arguments that do not come from the very especific aproved sources nor do are built in the specific manner that is most convient i.e. an anti stablishment commentary not made in a manner than cannot be instantly and satisfactorily dismissed by merely refering to the individual in question who made it as a fascist and whatnot.
meh not really to be fair
calling yourself "patriot" or talking about "islamofascism" is literal fucking centrist talk, it was valls' bread and butter for 5 years and he was a PM for the socialist party
if you're actually "extreme right wing" you sure don't say such shit, since "patriotism" is a centrist buzzword meaning you love niggers if they are french, and "islamofascism" is demeaning to fascism
it's like the boomer facebook posts comparing islam to nazis i mean please this is center right as fuck, to anyone actually far right the "islamo fascism" talk is just funny
If you're gonna go for the pseudo-smart word salad approach, at least adopt some decent syntax and orthography, man.
It did though
"Discuss the creation of white only communities"
This is clearly an invitation to report anyone ever making a negative comment on race mixing propaganda.
And I do not mean just an image of an interracial couple, surely not every single such image was made with a clear propaganda intent, but I far more mean comments like, and I paraphrase from Hollande, french politician "It is not enough to promote race mixing, we should force it" which in my opinion he represents the negative aspect of this EU propaganda and policy.
PS
I do not consider myself "white", and I personally do not believe in racial superiority, nor do I believe people should be discriminated due to race alone.
To say what I just said, with less words, and better grammar would require far too long, which at the time contradicts my casual-posting, mood, and enthusiam. But I do apologize for my lack of intellectual energy(?), of which I only used enough to say the basics of what I wanted. (isn´t lazyness when one knows he can do more but doesnt?)
By the way, let me just say I do not wish to impress anyone in the manner you claim, I just wish to voice my opinion.
PS when you said my post should be on the chart, I thought you were agreeing with me in a satirical manner... I guess not.
I'll defend this by saying that the armed forces is not the correct platform for political discussion. A successful army needs unity and members who will do as they are told. If the commanding ranks start letting the lower ranks develop their own agenda, you start to lose authority and then unity.
They should put 'cultural marxism' somewhere.
>It's only brainwashing, indoctrination, and propaganda when they do it. When we do it it's the truth.
They are doing this because some nazi pedophiles got busted trying to kill some political figure.
well deserved you guys were nation centric rather than ethno centric for so long that literally everyone can be british at this point
I agree with you, from the pesperctive of unity, and the armed forces being the armed wing of a goverment.
Naturally, an armed wing of a goverment, should coincide with its ideology and policy, regardless, otherwise it is indeed a threat, which defeats the purpose that goverment in question requires said armed wing for.
Nevermind if I agree with said goverment or not, or with the extention of power it has through its military and relation with its military.
Yes, already been pointed out
>implying Jow Forumscels don't do literally all of that on a regular basis
>make inaccurate generalisations about the left
holy fucking shit
This is fake right? Even if it is it exposes we have people on fucking Jow Forums who applaud it. Fuck this website got flooded with redditshitters.
No the Army is for making friends.
The army is for gaining political power
I bet this pic comes as a shock to many here
Not when we have adverts for the Army with fucking Muslims praying
lmao