Ancient India wasn't white -- Fuck off

>The name "Krishna" originates from the Sanskrit word Kṛṣṇa, which is primarily an adjective meaning "black", "dark", or "dark blue".[25]

>The Sangam literature refers to an extensive regional collection in Tamil language, mostly from the early centuries of the common era. These Tamil texts revere Vishnu and his avatars such as Krishna and Rama, as well as other pan-Indian deities such as Shiva, Muruga, Durga, Indra and others.[59] Vishnu is described in these texts as mayon, or "one who is dark or black in color" (in north India, the equivalent word is Krishna).[59]

>Rāma is a Vedic Sanskrit word with two contextual meanings. In one context as found in Arthavaveda, states Monier Monier-Williams, it means "dark, dark-colored, black" and is related to the term ratri which means night. In another context as found in other Vedic texts,

>Draupadi emerged as a beautiful dark-skinned young woman after her sibling Dhrishtadyumna.[5] When she emerged from the fire, a heavenly voice said that she would bring about the destruction of the Kuru line.[6] Draupadi is described in the Mahabharata as a very beautiful woman of that time.[7]

Why do retards keep insisting Ancient India was white? And why the fuck do some pajeets keep on harping about them being proud of being Aryan and not Dravidian? We are Aryo-Dravidian.

Attached: Krishna_Attacks_Bhishma.jpg (1024x768, 173K)

Other urls found in this thread:

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/292581v1.full
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Aryans were the worst thing to ever happen to India.

This now a hinduism thread.
Who was best girl and why is Parvati?

Indra hates your swarthy skin. You would know this if Dravidians were able to read the Aryan texts, such as the Ṛgveda:

>1.9.3 – “O Lord of all men, fair of cheek, rejoice thee in the gladdening lands, present at these drink-offerings.”
>1.100.18 – “He, much invoked, hath slain Dasyus and Simyus, after his wont, and laid them low with arrows. The mighty Thunderer with his fair-complexioned friends won the land, the sunlight, and the waters.”
>1.101.1 – “Sing, with oblation, praise to him who maketh glad, who with Rjisvan drove the dusky brood away. Fain for help, him the strong whose right hand wields the bolt, him girt by Maruts we invoke to be our Friend.”
>4.16.13 – “Thou to the son of Vidathin, Rjisvan, gavest up mighty Mrgaya and Pipru. Thou smotest down the swarthy fifty thousand, and rentest forts as age consumes a garment.”
>5.29.10 – “One car-wheel of the Sun thou rolledst forward, and one thou settest free to move for Kutsa. Thou slowest the noseless [i.e. flat-nosed] Dasyus [Blacks] with thy weapon, and in their home o’erthrewest hostile speakers.”
>10.23.4 – “With him too is this rain of his that comes like herds: Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard. When the sweet juice is shed he seeks the pleasant place, and stirs the worshipper as wind disturbs the wood.”
>10.96.8 – “At the swift draught the Soma-drinker waxed in might, the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair. He, Lord of Tawny Coursers, Lord of fleet-foot Mares, will bear his Bay Steeds safely over all distress.”
>Soma Pavamana, 9.41.1 – “Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, Driving the black skin far away.”
>Soma Pavamana, 9.73.5 – “O’er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin, which Indra hates.”

>Rig Veda
Too old, and rendered obsolete by the arrival of Krishna.
Besides, Indra was defeated by Krishna.

But Krishna, Rama, and Vishnu ARE BLACK! Indra existed somewhere in 3000 BCE - 1800 BCE, not in the domain of Ancient India. That's pre-historic India.

Indra is probably one of the most important characters who PRETTY much gets defeated by pretty much everyone else so ......

Butthurt amanuṣya that the parampara of Brahman was always in the hands of the white Brāhmaṇ. There is a reason you paṣyu are known, alongside the sons of whores, as varṇa-saṅkara according to Kṛṣṇa himself:

>सङ्करो नरकायैव कुलघ्नानां कुलस्य च ।
>पतन्ति पितरो ह्येषां लुप्तपिण्डोदकक्रियाः ॥ 42 ॥

As Śrīla Prabhupāda said:
>“Dravidian culture. Dravida. They are non-Aryans. Just like these Africans, they are not Aryans. Now they are mixing up with Europeans and Americans. In India, it was, one from the higher section, brahmanas, Kshatriya, Vaishya, they will be fair complexion. Shudras, black. So if a Brahmana becomes black, then he’s not accepted as Brahmana. And if a shudra becomes fair, then he’s to be known that he’s not pure shudra.” (Room Conversation, August 2, 1976, New Mayapur farm, France).

What does That have to do with anything I said retard ?

Indra pretty much Gets BTFO'D all the time

My point is, flat-nosed dasyu, that Kṛṣṇa even calls you varṇa-saṅkara (that you are unwanted and the progeny of kula-ghnānām [the destroyers of the family], since you probably know nothing of Arya Sanskrit); Indra and the most ancient Védāsaḥ are hardly the only ones to denounce your existence.

Attached: 140730-dalit-community-inline-1342_30aeb04d9f0af505abad3c22165635eb.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg (1500x1000, 179K)