CHAINLINK

$23

>anything less than $1M EOY

Sauce?

$2500 EOY

$1000

31.12.2018. 23:59:59

being realistic about 1.50 - 2

1400 eoy. check em

>pink ID
Never gonna make it

$2500 EOY

Attached: 1530060434754.png (1743x1959, 706K)

this....I upgraded to the $2500k timeline and never looked back. Thanks Chainlink!!!!

Attached: linkpepebigmachat.jpg (500x500, 222K)

youre not gonna make it either.....but i will

Check'd

Attached: 1518828171115.jpg (1920x1080, 410K)

Attached: 1533234177891.jpg (645x773, 120K)

OP I hold link and that has to be literally the worst link meme ever real braap posting but to lame to even sniff

Attached: linksmaug.jpg (800x418, 195K)

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data APIs through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

Attached: 1457044334241.png (420x420, 7K)

Chekt. The $2500 timeline is best

Attached: CHECKEM.gif (488x291, 3.7M)

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data APIs through crypto.Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

Attached: linksergeysolo.jpg (547x432, 180K)

so little effort went into this.

star wars is ded user. ded. luke got lukememea from a cancerous space tit and the galaxy died of forceaids.

Very chekt

Link is will for be 150 rupees yearly ending. I am very being sorry anonymous fellows. News not good for crypto. Very it is bad. It having bad sickness.

Attached: darth.jpg (664x341, 149K)

$0.5 EOY

Attached: 1520522608134 - Kopie.png (900x1039, 418K)

Nicely said user, which coins would you consider for real world application them?

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but chainlink has roughly 3.5x the circulating supply as ETH. ETH reached over $1000 each.

If link were to reach the market cap that ETH had when it hit 1k - 1000/3.5 = $285.71. Obviously the entire market is tied to BTC. And circulating supply will also have a major impact, but if circ supply remains the same, btc takes off and we see link getting a lot of adoption, it doesn't seem too farfetched

$1000

We cannot be stopped

Attached: IMG_1111.png (1257x2113, 1.64M)

Does this bitch look jaundice to anyone else? Med fags, speak up.

If that last one happens I may unironically jump off a bridge

how mortifying.....

Attached: linksergscream.jpg (317x400, 85K)

I've bought about ~$100 dollars of LINK over two months at an average price of around 37¢, usually due to FOMO and usually running into a loss.

I think LINK hype and fud are produced by the same group of people to pump and/or dump the market. Anyways, I'll be happy if it goes above 40 cents. Not like I have any real stake in this.

Attached: FB_IMG_1533504616948.jpg (519x522, 28K)