$1000 EOY is FUD

This guy makes me cringe.

of course, just have security deposits that are worth more than attacking the contract.

Attached: 1521778225962.jpg (600x800, 398K)

>chainlink will fail because the network is vulnerable to sybil attack
So...Is he right?

Can someone who knows more about this please explain?

link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

Attached: Untitled.png (753x765, 133K)

Has Sergey addressed sybil attacks or however its spelled. Please high iq user refute this fud now so we can sleep tonight

You have a concern.
You are a brainlet.
These people are laying the foundation for the next industrial revolution.
And you think your concern is somehow valid?

I dont fucking know. That's why i asked...

so basically they're vulnerable, no wonder SWIFT dropped them and they're not even invited to sibos this year lmao

You really need sub-115 IQ you can't immediately figure out the environments wherein these would become a null issue

how does trusted hardware prevent the sybil attack, you still have to put the data into your trusted hardware

>Bitcoin isn't stupid. There are a lot of things that aren't in Bitcoin because they don't fucking work.
He's right. IF, and only if, the Chainlink project can actually solve the oracle problem as it claims, then it is literally more valuable than crypto itself, because it provides a reliable and secure way for smart contracts to communicate with crucial external data. We are literally on the verge of a smart contract revolution, these things are literally the future, they just need reliable oracles. Well, my bets are on Chainlink, for sure. I will literally marry Chainlink!

Yes, there are many strategies link can employ that would stop a Sybil attack.

Yes Link $2500 EOY

Bring it