If you buy some BCH, congratulations; you've already made it. You've already secured your future wealth.
If you buy enough gold, you'll eventually make it (could take many many years though).
If you buy Chainlink and rely primarily on that to make it, you're not making it. Ever.
If you're a virgin soiboy blockstreamcuck who just holds BTC, you're not making it. You'll be better off than Chainlink holders though...
Nah, Ethereum or 0xBTC only.
Anything not on the ETH blockchain is toast for the foreseeable future.
Anything you do with an antminer is toast.
Bulk of miners are going to go bankrupt and suicide or be forced to sell btc or BCH to cover losses. Bitcoin and SHA256 mining is going to implode.
BCash is a meme that you fell for, BRAINLET
I don't see Bcash getting a market with ICE NYSE
you can actually open up alt coins and ICOs using BCH now. Also there are social media sites like memo.cash where each post is directly put on the blockchain (though you have to pay a transaction fee to post each time)
Chainlink is the real Bitcoin Cash.
bcash
So this whole thread was meant to fud chainlink.
you'll be sorry this time next year
Bitcoin will remain king
are you a paid fudder trying to divide people to make it look like people who buy chainlink can't also have bought BCH, and vice-versa? i saw this all over the leddit linktrader board, too
it really looks like they're definitely two of the safest long-term investments, as well as two of the best short-to-medium-term investments there are
bcash
lmao - nobody gives a fuck cashie bagholder
feeling pretty bad about believing in bch all this time... the last year might as well have not happened. when is this coin going to see some actual gains?
Right now is the time to gain BCH
Then in the future you can gain in fiat value.
This post is not trading advice™
whoever said time in the market beats timing the market was a complete faggot. seems like in crypto you can be late as fuck and get a million chances to buy at rock bottom.
what are the chances we see $200/bch again?
no idea.
i can't call the bottom.
anything you wanna do as far as trying to get cheap coins you have to figure out on your own
i only know 1 thing for sure, bch has the best chance out of all crypto to be valuable in the future.
The way the crypto market works will change soon enough. It has to mature first.
But yeah you're right. The last bubble pretty much never happened if you just hodld
i dont know but i been told its hard to run with the weight of gold
please fuck off back to redd!t
70 BCH right now... just picked up more
feels good man
I'm pretty sure 1M per coin is a legitimate possibility at some point
very far in the future.
maybe 7 years?
a lot has to go right for that to happen though.
its not guaranteed.
you can help by improving BCH in any way you can.
let's see how much pain we have to go through first.
You cashies are so delusional.
You remind me of a balding 50 year old car salesman, buying an expensive ferrari because he's going through a midlife crisis.
All you care about is transaction speeds and flashy features that are unnecessary, and furthermore harmful to the bitcoin ecosystem.
You do not understand that bitcoin is valued because of its security, not its transaction throughput or ability to create colored coins, or have turning complete smartcontracts. (Yes bitcoin has smartcointracts, they're just not turning complete by design)
Truth is, those features are unnecessary and if they are to be added to the network, they should be added to a sidechain, where they cannot corrupt the security and decentralization of the main chain.
It's sad that you cashies don't have the ability to plan long term, and you don't value the security of your network. You don't understand that block chains inherently only scale linearly by increasing the size, and the more you increase the size, the less decentralized it gets.
In your mind biggerblocks = moretransactions = better, which is exactly what a Keynesian would think.
A currency that acts as a store of value, i.e one that considers the longevity of its situation is superior.
I'm glad you now have your own network, so I can watch your chain crash and burn from a safe distance.
Truth is everything about bitcoin cash is based around marketing, and bitcoin is based around development.
You guys don't even like your lead developer of bitcoin-abc, Amaury Séchet, since he disagreed with your marketing team supervisor.
You guys are honestly pathetic, and your shitcoin will never be worth even a tenth of bitcoin ever again.
Repent, for the kingdom of god is at hand.
Q is a leftist, Israel supporting-kike, larp.
If fake satoshi is Q, then I certainly don't want to be associated with your network.
Bcash is a failed alt-coin it will drop sub 200$ by EOY
>If you buy Chainlink and rely primarily on that to make it, you're not making it. Ever.
This is where you are wrong. Chainlink and BCH together will alter realities.
So if (((they))) divide and conquer, why does Q want us to divide and conquer Iran? is it because they don't have a Rothschild Central bank?
Irans bank is controlled by someone else.
Why do you think the EU is so friendly with them?
Iran has had puppet leaders since forever ago. I actually know people from there and who have family there. They all support something changing and QUICKLY. Their government arrests them for showing hair in public .
Their internet is censored.
NO freedom.
No jobs.
Nothing.
en.wikipedia.org
It's interesting. They have a central bank where interest is illegal.
No wonder the jews hate them.
Sorry, not buying into your Q conspiracy.
The last thing we need to do is invade another country in the middle east.
only a matter of time
Their central bank is literally a black cube
if you don't know what that means...
look it up "black cube"
they are controlled and their citizens are POOR
watch this video:
youtube.com
no one is invading anyone.
what happened with north korea?
war?
invasion?
peace?
peace.
That is not a black cube. That is a building.
I am aware of the theory and the desert rock they worship.
Still, zero interest rates is a problem for the Jews who make all their money by indebting governments.
Well if it turns out to be like north korea, I'll be fine with it.
But I need to see it to believe it.
>If you buy enough gold, you'll eventually make it (could take many many years though).
You're a fucking retard. Gold isn't an investment, it's a hedge.
You can believe what you want, of course.
Iran isn't what you think.
That image even says it. That building was constructed BEFORE the Islamic revolution, when Iran was controlled by Jews.
i think roger is super smarter than you think he is. make sure you can play 5D chess OP or you might get checked
Maybe you are right about it all.
Maybe they've just been trying to hold off the zog this entire time.
We'll see.
The payments from Obama were really suspicious though.
Islamists are the new "Jews", they throw their oil money around and set up religious front groups in countries to undermine nations. Influence of actual Jews probably peaked around 1800-1900.
Kek
I actually keked
>the more you increase the size, the less decentralized it gets.
Well, BCH can right now handle up to 200 tx/s without centralizing anything, while BTC will clog up with 7 tx/s like happened many times in December/January. With time more people will have better bandwidth and large SSD-s become cheaper so block size can keep increasing without centralization. Right now the BCH network can handle the same amount of transactions as PayPal, so it's probably enough for the next few years. A problem could arise when adoption grows faster than technology - this hasn't clearly been the case so far. At some point we will reach an abundance of block size where all the transactions of the world would fit easily.
I'm not saying LN isn't a viable option. I just think it's a much riskier approach because people tend to choose an easier solution. Given the current and the foreseeable condition of networks and hard drives, I would go for BCH. But I hold BTC and BCH 1:1.
>You don't understand that block chains inherently only scale linearly by increasing the size, and the more you increase the size, the less decentralized it gets.
Interesting fact: Throughput scales linearly with blocksize, but centralization scales superlinearly.
Good post, by the way, but cashies are some of the most deluded people on the planet together with the digibyte people. I don't think they will accept facts. They are literally flat earther.
Once BCH gets listed on Gemini and SBI I think we should see it trading around 0.2-0.3 of core worth. Flippening will happen, but it won't be instant. Patience my fellow bagholders, it'll pay off.
It's all about rv'ing middle eastern currencies making the rich even richer.
yes much better to keep everything offchain so we can all run useless fullnodes on our raspberry pis for "decentralization"