You do have a plan if chanlink fails to deliver?

You do have a plan if chanlink fails to deliver?
You're not naive and stupid, are you?

Attached: boy-scratching-head_shutterstock_68533339.jpg (1000x716, 216K)

Do you not understand the concept of all-in?

No risk no fun faggot

Why yes I do have a plan B

Attached: Glock-26-9mm_main-1.jpg (400x400, 21K)

>implying we need a plan B

Im all in and I even have a plan B...nothing certain yet boys.

Same.

Attached: 1529449196141.jpg (750x596, 86K)

unironically this

not worried at all though

I dont even have a plan A. Hell I dont even have a job or own any crypto. Ive been lurking this board for 4 years now. Im unironically a zoomerfag (20) and im a neet. Help.

Yep. I think many LINKies are in it for life. And if LINK fails, there will be many suicides. Including me.

The scary part is...i don't doubt any of you.

mcdonalds

Get a job dude what the fuck. Help yourself, there is nothing we can do for you.

Naive yes

I may be naive but I do not have a plan B, sir.

here's my plan B

Attached: f5e2839077a423f2ce8c743be0197b6d.jpg (634x800, 97K)

>chainlink
>failing to deliver
Get the fuck off my board

Attached: Butters.gif (248x224, 398K)

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

I'm literally all-in. $2000 liquid cash savings.

If Link dumps more I'm utterly fucked.

an hero

Attached: [Dragon-Releases] Fate Kaleid Liner Prisma Illya 2wei! - 05 [Dual Audio][10-Bit][BDRip][HD 1080p].mk (502x538, 381K)

Kneepads

it's good to have a plan b. fortunately we won't need it. check em

Attached: 1521343639062.png (967x954, 554K)

It's called a rope

>sergey exit scams to kill half of biz
>proceeds to give the funds to smart refugee cities to rub it in