Remember how ETH flash dumped? The opposite will happen with pic related.
Remember how ETH flash dumped? The opposite will happen with pic related
Noah Perry
Other urls found in this thread:
cnet.com
twitter.com
Gabriel Cox
Michael Parker
Benjamin Hill
Nicholas Barnes
D
E
L
U
D
E
D
Aaron Russell
Brayden Foster
>SAP has a blockchain project for shipping, logistics and customs, too, and it's working with partners including the US Customs and Border Protection agency and shipping company UPS.
Landon Peterson
Here to spread some genuine good pasta:
The hype phase of crypto is long gone. Projects will now succeed or fail based on deliverables, not promises. But realistically, most promising crypto projects (what few of them are) absolutely require off-chain data to be useful in any non-trivial context. Without it, you can build as many crypto services as you want but the only thing they will be able to do is facilitate the transfer of chuck-e-cheese tokens back and forth between autists and moonbois.
ChainLink is not a sure bet, it may or may not become the industry standard oracle solution. But there is sort of no point holding anything else (except maybe daddy BTC) until the fate of ChainLink is decided. If it moons, then it enables the mooning of the rest of cryptospace. If it dies off, then crypto projects are still stuck wallowing with their thumbs up their asses waiting for a true decentralized oracle project to succeed. Even on the off chance that LINK fails and another decentralized oracle gains prominence, there would be plenty enough time to see the writing on the wall and move back into your other alts before they moon.
Do you see what I'm saying? ChainLink can't possibly do worse than other crypto projects in the near term, because their success is contingent on ChainLink being successful. It is like investing in automobile technology when paved roads haven't even been invented yet. You may think you're managing risk by keeping LINK a small percent of your portfolio, but in actuality all you are doing is hamstringing yourself. All those other coins won't and can't moon until after (or if) ChainLink does.
Look at REQ as a prime example. They promised fiat integration Q2 but needed ChainLink mainnet to be operational before they could pull it off. Why would you invest in REQ when it can't be successful until after ChainLink succeeds? It's madness.
10-100$ EOY
Blake Long
>another decentralized oracle
nice fud user
Leo Parker
>ChainLink is not a sure bet
Nice FUD, almost had me
Brandon Sanders
Fud? This was an obvious shill XD. Just looking at it in an objective way.
I'm all in for Chainlink.
Aaron Perez
Just trying to be realistic. Nothing is a sure bet in life except death. I have full faith in Chainlink, so I'm in no way fudding.
Luis Bennett
this is an obvious shill, yours was a thinly veiled pessimistic fud. Chainlink is in the bag. It was in the bag from the word go.
my linky stay stink
800 big macs EOY
Liam Long
Holy shit, I wrote that. Thanks for preserving and turning it into pasta user.
Ryder Moore
fug, I don't know whos Delphi-ing who anymore....
Gabriel Morgan
>Tries to be realistic
>Still believes Chainlink isn't a sure bet
When was the last time you practiced visualizing $1000 or $2500 EOY (pick whichever timeline you like)?
You haven't been missing visualization sessions have you?
Nathan Torres
Since I wrote the fucking thing, let me address this: it doesn't MATTER if chainlink is a sure bet or not. Nothing else is going to make moves until it proves itself one way or another. There is no point holding anything else until ChainLink does its thing.
We all have read the autism connect-the-dots reports and seen the writing on the wall, chances are good that CL will be the industry standard. But Sergey could die tomorrow, Dev wallet could get hacked and drained of all 650m tokens tomorrow, all sorts of black swan shit could happen. It doesn't even matter, the correct thing to do is to maximize LINK anyways.
Jaxson Phillips
s-stop saying those bad things at the end
Christian Anderson
Ayden Scott
link is going to suceed but I guarantee that smartcontract.com and their benefactors will fork new tokens on Azure's PoA chain and sell those exclusively to businesses. we weren't meant to have it and we won't have it soon enough
Evan Morales
idk user, still sounds kinda fuddy duddy to me
1600 big macs eoy
Chase Gutierrez
why wouldn't all these companies at least be testing smart contracts with a shit centralized oracle like oraclize or mobius in the meantime if they actually cared? obviously for high stakes contracts a trustless oracle is preferable but it doesn't seem like anyone is even looking at any of the alternatives which makes me wonder if they actually even care about smart contracts
Charles Richardson
and this. seems pretty clear at this point that companies dont really care about decentralization and want no part in any of the public chains (see: vechain getting rekt by IBM in supply chain)
Jordan Cox
Holy shit... the more I look at this, the more I see in it. Truly the best so far. Gonna need this bigger though so I can print it out unironically.
Justin Williams
They need oracles that are outside the influence of businesses. Neets are the perfect counter balance to industry giants to keep everything truly decentralized.
Isaac Scott
because they've been able to test against Chainlink's beta network for years. as a dev it makes no sense to integrate with some shit level library/network when you've played around with the beta of one launching soon and know you're going to build against it instead. these institutions have plenty of other things to get through for DLT before they can launch so using Oraclize in the meantime gains them no advantage.
Robert Torres
to be clear, I am holding 100k stinkies and playing devils advocate
Julian Brooks
I sell you the original..... 50 stinkers
Henry Morris
Nah fug dat. 50k for a picture isnt worth it
Elijah Bennett
No THANK YOU, for making this awesome pasta. I convinced my friends with it hahaha.
Austin Bailey
>You may think you're managing risk by keeping LINK a small percent of your portfolio, but in actuality all you are doing is hamstringing yourself.
This is my basic argument whenever I meet a 30 year old boomer talking about their ETFs and mutual funds because they want low risk investments. We're heading for a bust cycle in the traditional market and a golden bull run in the crypto market, so how is that a low risk investment?
great pasta btw
Luis Cooper
if the stock market crashes crypto will crash harder. people move their money into safe investments when the economy is in recession, not ultra volatile speculative internet coins.
Jackson Murphy
all day every day me and all of my boys in the discord are shilling chainlink and there's nothing you can do about it. it's moon time baybee. you had a year- an entire fucking year to accumulate a comfy quantity of chainlink and you just couldn't make it happen. you couldn't stop paying student debts or rent or buying shitty microbrews or jacking off into a sock and me and my crew are here to remind you of it. you passed up on a year of prime time link accumulation and now it's time to eat shit. fuck every single one of you fud slinging faggots. my homies and i are better than all of you and i'm not even foolin. faggots. you're all weak fucking faggots and i hope you don't make it. there's no room for you at the top. eat shit.
Brody Russell
tfw couldn't link my account with coinbase due to some stupid bullshit with my bank so didn't get in on the stank in march like I wanted to
Caleb Morgan
don't devalue my art, im from the $2500 timeline
that's a 125k piece of art there bucko
Samuel Bell
Nathaniel Edwards
I think he hasn't been visualizing at all....
Jeremiah Garcia
$3750 timeline here. It's physically taxing to jump timelines like this, but the rewards are unimaginable.
Levi Nelson
Azure's PoA chain is ChainLink
Dominic Garcia
Checked. $3740 eoy