Internet speeds in Italy are comparable to the ones in Ethiopia

I thought you guys had better internet speed than us, is this map legit?

I doubt it.

Rich neighborhoods : ok-tier internet.
Everywhere else in those shitholes : be lucky if you have a stable line.

Most likely not, but it's lumped with the rest of France and in France Paris pulls the average. Also if the data comes from speedtest, it's biased because the faster your connection is, the more likely you are to test it (mostly to brag, because that's a thing).

>10 - 12.5 mbps
Nah man. On a good day I'm only just able to stream 1080p video on YouTube

Oh yea, I just noticed. How the fuck do kiwis have better internet than you guys lol

This, I barely have 1mbps of down in good days and that's when things are stable, which is fairly rare

I used to live in Rhone-Alpes in France and the internet speed was worse than in a provincial russian town. This map is shit.

I suffer in France.

Attached: 5001114870.png (350x200, 21K)

It is

Is it like what is describing? Maybe Berlin or Cologne are pulling above the average?

It’s ok, man. At least you have a toilet.

Attached: C91A0E87-5B2A-4C56-843A-4A9547D741F9.jpg (640x354, 103K)

wtf is even worse than mine, do you live in the countryside
forgot pic

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-05-08-44-59.png (1438x539, 63K)

can confirm it's shit, 2mbps and the router keep disconnetting every time during the day.

How much do you pay ? 5$ a month for your internet speeds on our government provider which is the worst choice possible

>Netherlands
>fast interbutts
Yeah right

Attached: 8312085763.png (350x200, 20K)

No, it's because all statistics about the FR"G" Ltd are fake.

Don't (you) him, he's an autistic /p*L/tard

vodafone?

I live in the middle of nowhere and get 20mbps with fttc fiber. 100mbps is planned by 2022/3

It is, we can't into technology

Infostrada

I found a much more detailed one for the US. Anyone cares to confirm this one?
I think that map shows for broadband speeds. Isn't broadband different from fiber?

Attached: kFUhsKD.png (800x450, 125K)

Wireless/4G in small rural village.

Attached: speedtst.png (757x310, 150K)

You don't need good internet in Italy, they live in Italy, the country of culture and history.

>infostrada
Just switch to tim nibba

Attached: 1559011983776.jpg (950x720, 36K)

This can't be true. They have all those big tech companies.

I'm not from Jow Forums, as it's filled with Jew worshipping American boomers, you phoneposter.

Attached: 1538955324972.jpg (1902x1590, 277K)

damn

Attached: 8312114507.png (350x200, 20K)

It's one of the very few perks of being a very flat country, good reception everywhere. Pic related, 4G 100M coverage.

Attached: 4G_100M.png (1031x1233, 240K)

Fixed household internet is good in non-rural France. Good fibre and LTE(+) doesn't exist outside of the urban centres.

Attached: Capture.png (558x133, 16K)

nobody cares about village inhabitants.

this is discount internet connection here

Attached: 8312148423.png (350x200, 20K)

they promised me 300-350 instead of this, AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
speedtest.net/result/8312160037.png

6.6 usd per month in my countryside for that.

Attached: 8312158320.png (350x200, 21K)

>25mbps
>when gigabit ftth is literally everywhere and costs like 13 to 30 euros per month, depending on location
This is including all the mobile shitters, innit?

Nigga i dont knlw what the fuck you're talking about i live in Southern Italy and i get 60 mbps download, 20 Mbps upload

And that is slow as fuck.

i am not happy

Attached: fghjg.png (1120x202, 26K)

Our government fucked up our internet. The map is definitely wrong, I live in a major city and rarely reach 10mbps.
At my old house the internet would stop working when it rained, and this was in the heart of Sydney.

Am I in the exception category or do I still count as the norm?

Attached: 8312244005.png (350x200, 21K)

At least 50 Mbps internet should be a basic human right. Unironically.

A ISP here stopped investing in fiber because they think that 5G is the future. They said that everything will be wireless anyway.

they aren't really wrong

Fiber is best for dense cities with highrise buildings and wireless is good to cover rural plains.

That doesn't matter anymore with 5G.

How are the 5G towers connected to the rest of the grid?

Fiber. They just stopped investing in fiber from door to door.

Wireless internet = no gaems
Using wireless internet for gaming is just as stupid as a wireless mouse use

I'm very jealous

$40usd/ month for Internet + Phone

Attached: speed.png (399x365, 37K)

>t. stuck in 2004
I mean, I'd rather not use wireless either, but the days of it being noticeably slower have long passed.

High buildings and hilly landscape will block even 5G signals, which is why a strong fiber backbone supplemented with wireless is the optimal solution. Neither can provide an equally functionin solution as the two can when used in symbiosis.

Nah, 4G latency is decent and 5G is on par with fiber in that regard. It's only a problem if your reception is bad.

A brain surgery has been done over a 5g net.

Its not slower, but less reliable and stable. And this is crucial for gaming.

It's not France, it's french Guyana

The 5G frequency is much better for that. They KPN and T-mobile are doing tests here and they got the ping down to 1 in Utrecht.

>tfw surrounded by third worlders

Attached: pootie-poo-i6708.jpg (500x376, 30K)

Don't know much about 5G yet, but what about contention though. With lots of Internet users per tower that's going to impact your latency/ jitter.

I'm supposed to get 100mbps. I should call the ISP provider and complain but I don't really do anything besides watch youtube.

Attached: speed test.jpg (470x508, 41K)

The 5 G antenna are boxes, they don't have to be on the traditional gsm towers.
Also my dick:
youtube.com/watch?v=GtC9GhN0ttI

>your internet speed is fast

Attached: 1556133770229.jpg (749x926, 110K)

I remember the days of 50 gb per month cap and having to download the lowest quality anime available to avoid exceeding it. Uncapped internet is the best thing to happen in my life.

Attached: 8312298328.png (350x200, 22K)

Exactly, which is why such highrise buildings and super dense areas should still have fiber available, which could be supplemented with 5G onto more spread out areas. Fiber is best for super high density while 5G is great for more spread out userbase.

>decentinternetspeedstugal

>Exactly, which is why such highrise buildings and super dense areas
This is why they invented 5g. There is no such thing anymore. there are antennas everywhere. This isn't 2009 grandpa.

notice the graph at the start, unless i am retarded it looks like i am being throttled.
Capacity seems to be up to 1k Mb/s, but im not paying for that anyway

Attached: 1.jpg (737x343, 24K)

Wrong map. We have fast and cheap internet (100mb for 9$)

Good for them, internet makes people retarded

Bruh I have gigabit but my retarded ass installed cat5 in the wall plus people here are already getting 10gbit now

Attached: received_2470701242954542.jpg (1242x2182, 88K)

kek, that speed was good like 15 years ago

Attached: 8312314282.png (350x200, 20K)

What kind of cartel are the 4g router manufacturers running since a Cat6 router costs 200 euros? Probably costs to build something around 20euros.

>g*Rms
OOF

That's not how it works.

youtube.com/watch?v=GEx_d0SjvS0

This is acceptable
I live in an area where has 38million people

Attached: 9348592222.jpg (468x84, 12K)

Terroni are stealing our fiber

Attached: fiber coverage.png (685x949, 103K)

Ma tornatene sul forum dei brutti lmao

Which year does this map belongs to.

Speak english, subhuman.

They just have ””conections”” if you know what i mean.

I suffer in Kazakhstan

btw this is my provider's shitty wifi modem

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-05-15-32-50-780_org.zwanoo.android.speedtest.jpg (1080x476, 54K)

Furente e senza fibra

They have overpaid CEO and manager staff to look out for

Africa reporting in

Attached: Capture.png (1022x173, 22K)

It's definitely true, you have no clue how large the USA is. It costs a lot of money to lay down cables and rural areas are typically substantially poorer than people who live in cities. ISPs just don't want to bother with servicing people who can't really afford to pay.

The red zones on the map tend to be more rural or unpopulated, although there are a few quirks. Ohio actually has quite a lot of people but none of its counties are blue. The two Dakotas have next to no people living in them, but both are light blue. California underperforms as well, considering that's where most of those big tech companies are headquartered. Washington state and Texas mostly have the rest, and their blue spots are about where I'd expect them to be.

Attached: file.png (350x200, 20K)

>that up speed
Fucking insane

>play 1v1 with random player
>he complains about lag
>keeps telling me its my fault
>i ask him where he's from
>he says india and continues to blame my connection
Third worldies are so ignorant of how shit their connection is

I love paying 24 euros/month for my unstable 4 mbps internet.

Attached: dTcAHZc.jpg (800x857, 67K)

Are asymetrical plans the norm in US? No one even lists upload here, because it's expected to be the same as download.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-05-14-37-34-125_org.mozilla.fennec_aurora.png (1080x1920, 139K)

A recent one
speedtest.net/global-index

btw it's because there are many little towns to connect
It's easier to have better average internet speed if your population is concentrated in cities