I am unironically considering buying 100k NANO

Should I do it?

Attached: 683E048B-397A-4426-ACCC-6FD24787676F.jpg (800x450, 43K)

Risk/reward after it bled this hard is pretty damn good. Can you buy that much without moving its market though?

its practically stealing at these prices

I’m not sure yet.

Exactly.

wait till 80 cents get more for your dollar.

wait for 2k sats

it's like STEALING at these prices, you go ahead and buy this.

Now you're thinking like smart money. Buy half now, half in case it drops lower.

i would. i think its a lock to be at least one dollar again in the next few years

No lol

do you not remember XRB's run up, newfag.

Has anyone ever realised how much stealing takes place at these prices

But SHH SHH though

Me needs to cumulate

Think about what NANO needs to become a highly used network. Put yourself in the shoes of a normie who doens't give the slightest fuck about "decentralisation" or "crypto" and, if anything, actually has a negative association with those terms.
That normie, in the future, needs to wonder how to send money overseas, or to a friend, and NANO needs to be the BEST, EASIEST way to do that. Considering that normie's money is already in a bank account, and they can send money from there, you are already at a disadvantage. You have to convince the normie to move money from their bank account to the NANO app, then send it using the NANO app, and it will only be received by the recipient if they have the NANO app as well.
That's not a product anyone will use. Too many steps, too much bullshit, and the fact that the recipient needs the same app (wallet) is an absolute killer.
For me it comes down to one thing. It doesn't matter if the NANO network is instant, because the user still has to deposit the money from their bank account. That will take as long as a bank account transfer takes. So even with an instant transfer once it's in NANO form, you haven't actually saved any time. Add on the fact that 1) Banks will respond to this potential competition by making interbank transfers cheaper and easier, 2) if NANO actually became a threat to their bottom line they could delay transfers into NANO (and this is even assuming a direct fiat onramp that doesn't exist yet) to undermine its value.
NANO is the product of a market that is fixated on the "fiat replacement" aspect of crypto but honestly there is so much that has to go right for it to become actually competitive that I think it's a terrible investment, even after this collapse.

feeling very bullish on Nano. Bittrex following on twitter, no single dev team in the entirety of crypto is as active and prolific as Nano's... People spreading FUD in here are just trolls tryna further tank the price and proactively protect their own shitcoin-portfolios by FUDing the coin that poses the biggest threat.

Nano's not that bad, but Dero is so far ahead of it technology-wise now. Dero is basically Nano but with more added on top of it.

Upvoted

>dero
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ENJOYING YOUR BAGS PAJEET

Stay poor.

>Banks will respond
Banks all across the row have done nothing but expressing their contempt for their customers for at least 20 years now. They won't respond to shit, I doubt they can.

make sure you hijack a plane and do a barrel roll in 2 months