Why is most of this planet so fucking shit?
You have:
Japan (125m)
South Korea (50m)
Switzerland (8m)
Finland (5m)
That's 188m humans who live in approximately decent countries, out of 7710m people worldwide. 2.4%. Why is this species a whole such a fuckshow? It's such a liability.
wait 10 years and we are not a decent country anymore
this is the worst post I've seen in a while, good show, old chap.
>Japan
>South Korea
>decent countries
You insect loving garbage needs to be shot
>SK
I wouldn't be surprised, there's a reason only two white countries still made the list
Not an argument
Are you saying you wouldn't prefer if the current residents of Malmo were replaced with Japanese?
>south korea
>decent
no its not, our living price is highter than london as I refer to my last visit to bongland
>Housing prices higher than London
Impossibru, unless you are Manhattan
by what metric are those countries better than everybody else?
Factors like purchasing power, economic equality, ethnic homogeneity, high genetic quality, life expectancy, having functional infrastructure, being well-educated, peaceful and low crime rates, etc.
South Korea is no better than Canada or America in most of those
Fuck off, weeb
Maybe some of them. But America and Canada are on downwards spirals while Korea is on an upwards spiral.
Housing prices varies but my family home(which is apartment) is not even in seoul and it costs like 0.6 mil in britbong scale
also they take almost half as tex if I want to inherit/sell the property
Though one thing you should bear in mind is there are 2 year contract to borrowing house. You exchange half(ish) of the property price with house while the term ends. (so no fee after exchange till its ends)
I will get 2k-ish a month as a freshman in my job field. how can I save up to that much?
Apart from that, your 2 quid shitty block of red reicester goes 8 quid right after hitting gookland. 250ml coke goes 1 quid
fuck my engrish
should sleep
Holy shit, Koreans actually eat Red Leicester cheese? I ate Korean-imported kimchi today so it's only fair.
However it costing so much... is probably because of tarriffs applied by your country. Britain runs big trade deficits every year while South Korea runs big trade surpluses, so in the long run we import more stuff but it is just selling out country's future. Barely anything in Britain even today is still owned by British people, all business and property are being bought up by foreigners. The young in Britain have been sold to the ground, while the young in South Korea have an increasing amount to inherit.
Numbeo has data comparing London and Seoul:
The rental prices in Seoul are MUCH lower than in London. Also keep in mind that most of London now are non-white areas, and so in order to feel safe as a native you would need to live in a more expensive area than the average. That doesn't compare to Seoul where you are with your own ethnicity wherever in the city you live.
Coca Cola is an Amerifat globohomo corporate marketing meme, don't fall for that shit, there are much better things to drink, I would need to be paid to put that stuff in my body.
Yup, my sight might have been overly tourist sided. Your opinion actually explains a lot of discrepancy between my part of tourism and those political flamewars between londoners and non-.
Though I still think england is still better to live by judging hospitality that came from the laidback attitude. We are just too cramped to have smoother attitude :l
Is it really that bad, even outside of Seoul and other major cities?
Look at this shite
When you say korea, it is more like seoul and non-essentials
you should live in those yellow/red circles if you really want to have a life
also most of those white areas are fucking mountains that somehow protected by government
We have places where the government blocks any development
Part 1: "Green belts" around cities
Part 2: "Areas of outstanding natural beauty"
And there is no excuse like mountains etc., most of these would actually be prime areas to build
green belt of korea
a those dark green colors?
those are fcking mountins
Part 3: "National Parks"
who does that?
>we must form a supranational political bidy or else our countries will bevome irrelevant on the international stage
>but building a few houses so that there is enough living space for a bigger population? I don't think sharia bloody allows that m8