From ChainLink Conference X2015 >In October 2001, Sergey Nazarov met with the families of 9/11 victims. After a brief interview in which he expressed his condolences and hope for closure, he reportedly burst out laughing and made airplane noises and mimicked two planes crashing. He then picked up the child of a deceased victim and whispered into her ear "Your dad's dead, bitch", and proceeded to put on a pair of sunglasses and unleash a barrage of martial arts attack on the small child. She was rushed to the hospital where she was pronounced dead due to extreme trauma. When asked later about the incident, Nazarov became visibly sexually aroused and repeated the same attack on the reporter.
I’ve come to believe no plane is the most logical answer
Julian Richardson
I really wish someone would build 5-6 floors of the WTC steel frame and fly a retired 767 into it to see what happens/ see if its even possible to recreate the speed etc.
>dunecoon that can't even land a cesna flies a 737 20 feet off the ground for 3 miles in order to strike the side of the Pentegon
Julian Watson
>2 planes turn massive skyscrapers into dust >Towers designed to withstand plane collisions >Explosions heard from basement and throughout building >Pentagon has no plane showing anywhere >Plane "vaporized" along with passengers >Retards need more proof
Hoooo-leee-shit...
Bonus... How many friends of Trumps do you think died that day?
*strike the side of the Pentegon while flying in between telephone poles
>How many friends of Trumps do you think died that day? dunno if "friends" is the right word (they couldve been as well, i suppose), but i know he had a whole office there and lost a ton of employees that worked for him. he also knew RIGHT away, and mentioned it on tv, that larry silverstein had taken out insurance on the buildings (against plane hijackings no less)
dunno if it was radioactive, but something was burning down there in the basement, and for MONTHS
Austin Collins
it was radioactive. there was a shitload of Tritium found in the water supply for a long time after 9/11
Michael Brown
i heard its still a problem in some places in lower manhatten
Nicholas Perez
yeah I reckon it would have just blown up and bounced off the outside leaving minimal damage desu
Lucas Evans
Dimitri Kalezovs version of events always rang true to me, only theory that explains steel columns turning to dust and the heat under the rubble for so long afterwards, whether or not underground nukes actually can turn steel to dust like that I have no idea but something weird is going on that is for sure
>why not both? because >it gives more room to fuck up and it would have looked like shit >the actual real planes can't fly this fast at this height because the air is too dense and the bombs had to go up at a specific place to destroy the building. >the slow speed of the real plane and the hard and fast detonation (and maybe fucked up timing) would have looked silly together
easier and faster to edit 2 "live"feeds, with 20 seconds delay while jew shills call in on live tv claiming to have seen planes and later shit out 50 more videos with CGI planes in them.
always thought it was weird how the only parts that seemed to have any damage was the outside and inside walls, with the middle totally unaffected
>it gives more room to fuck up and it would have looked like shit i have to disagree. having multiple things like this allows for all kinds of theories to pop up after the fact, obfuscating it. especially if everyone thinks one another is crazy for believing/not believing one aspect of it. plus without the planes being the method, there wouldve been no way to blame terrorists and get us into afghanistan/iraq
>>the actual real planes can't fly this fast at this height because the air is too dense and the bombs had to go up at a specific place to destroy the building. if they were just simply cruisng, you would be right, but if they were descending, they could easily gain plenty of speed. personally, i think the plane was a spectacular method of disguising demo-ing the entire building. it wouldve looked like any old controlled demolition, had everyone not SEEN the plane fly into the side of em. the planes gave it a reason to fall. same goes w bldg 7, and same for the part of the pentagon that just magically blew up and incinerated the plane.
they DID do it sloppy, they just did a bunch of other stuff sloppy on top of it and then silenced a lot of witnesses and made everyone think that questioning the official "investigation" was akin to smashing babies w hammers
>but if they were descending >they could easily gain plenty of speed no they can't. passenger planes can only reach high speed at high altitudes, at low altitudes the stress on the frame would be too high and the wings would break off before even coming near the needed speed they had on 9/11. real life is not a videogame.
>had everyone not SEEN the plane fly into the side of em. only Media shills reported seeing planes, plenty of people only reported bombs. like the girl in the OP video. nobody even heard a plane.
Pentagon and that "plane" in the field were both Cruise Missiles.
the only way the wings would rip off is if they tried to manuever while traveling at those speeds. they make those things sturdy enough to handle slightly beyond what theyre rated for. the point where the wings wouldve ripped off wouldve been had they tried to turn or adjust their pitch. but they did not. they simply glided it right into it, w throttle obviously pulled back somewhat.
regardless, were in agreement that it was nowhere near the amount of force nor heat that couldve caused what happened next. plane or not, theres multiple scientific studies/proofs that clearly show that a plane was not enough and that explosives were involved.
>Pentagon and that "plane" in the field were both Cruise Missiles. 100% agree theres no way (due to groundeffect) that you could fly such a large plane at full speed into a building thats only 4-5 stories high.
Joseph Hall
no one fucking cares about your boomers wars anymore
step down gramps and let new blood run things
Robert Rogers
so this looks real to you? can I ask what coins you hold in your portfolio?
