>I want to restrict immigration and consequently lower my nation's overall wealth because I hate brown people
I want to restrict immigration and consequently lower my nation's overall wealth because I hate brown people
Better poor than moor
cringe
based
Only the tardest of Jow Forumstards are categorically against all immigration
Nothing wrong with importing specialists if you need them, taking in "people" who produce nothing of value on the other hand...
>BUT WHAT ABOUT GDP...PER CAPITA?!?!
Fun fact, if I sell the missile launch codes for every US Silo to Russia, causing my country to be nuked by its own weapons and every single person to die except me, then I now have a massive irradiated wasteland to lease out to foreign corporations for whatever profit I can net. The GDP per capita has increased...because I'm a wealthy man now and there's only one of me. This is why we need open borders.
Both specialists and low-skilled labor are beneficial for the native-born population.
Then immigrate with your white nationalist buddies to a deserted island. See how you like subsistence economy in your all-white society.
>le strawman
That's also true if the foreign low skilled labor force is utilized effectively, but I guess it's a question of whether you think it's worth the demographic shift.
Perpetual growth is unsustainable, and wealth isn't the only factor in the happiness of the population.
I hate Jow Forumstards as much as the next guy but it's obvious a mutt is behind this post
Are low skilled immigrants being hired and paid a wage? That means they're producing something of value.
>Malthusian population hysteria in the 21st century
Don't brown people just leech on welfare?
Perhaps when you live in a fuckhuge country it's not an issue, but building new houses is a big debate in our country since it makes our green spaces less and less.
I'm someone who takes a lot of joy in nature and a massive population is antithetical to that. I believe we're already overpopulated as is.
low skill natives have have lower wages when we bring in low-skill immigrants to compete with them. that's why "civil rights leader" Caesar Chavez hated illegal immigrant Mexicans. He called them "scabs" and he and his followers would routinely report them to the authorities, and even went down to the border with clubs to intimidate them.
what's worse than lowering native workers wages, is when they just take the jobs completely, and the natives go on welfare. There used to be a lot of black owned and/or operated car washes in LA county. now they're all run by illegal immigrants. the blacks didn't get better paying jobs, they just became inter-generational welfare dependents.
based. Most of them simply don't know how to manage immigrants. Because they're shit at managing everything. I've always lived surrounded by foreigners and never had problems. It's funny when they come here searching for a job and get triggered because we treat them like any other nigger
>NOOO I CANT JUST LIVE ON WELFARE DOING NOTHING AND GETTING PAID FOR IT
rofl ameriMUTTs must wageslave themselves to shekelstels
>low skill natives have have lower wages when we bring in low-skill immigrants
Doesn't matter. Low skilled immigration has overwhelming benefits for the the average native-born person. Low skilled immigration lowers the price of goods and services for consumers and raises wages for the average native-born person. If you're concerned about low-skilled native-born workers, you're still better of allowing immigration and then transferring some of the gains from the winners to the losers.
i'd rather pay $20 for a black to wash my car, and not be on welfare; than pay $10 for an illegal latino to do it + $5 tax to the black on welfare.
I may be saving money with the latino, but the cost to the nation to have so many people on welfare is not only a financial cost, it's also a big social cost, that is felt by our culture, and majorly influences our political system.
It's bad only when they're too many. Here they're payed so much less than us that you don't even try to take their jobs. I've heard of Italians that works for 2k (half of what a clerk does), pretty convenient if you're putting up a business and you need cheap labor
>Jow Forums-tard pretending that he cares about black people
this but unironically
I'm gay and wanna poop my pants, see the correlation?
>those LAZY illegals are TAKING ALL OUR JOBS because they WORK FOR CENTS ON THE DOLLAR and send MILLIONS OF DOLLARS back to their countries
>gives reasonable argument againta immigration
>lol Jow Forumstard gtfo
Go do kikening somewhere else, Ephraim
Okay, if you say so. I just know, there's a stones throw, before ya go.
If the GDP per capita rises if you have more people in your country, it's a net benefit for the wealth of the country because immigrants then contribute more to the GDP than the average citizens.
it's good when the workers being replaced get better paying jobs. italians will be store clerks for you, so that swiss can go be bankers.
that's not what is happening in the US. the only job that we actually need foreigners to do is agricultural stoop-labor. all the other jobs that, supposedly, "americans wont do" (cleaner, landscaping, construction worker) are actually primarily done by US citizens.
illegals compete with our working-class directly. some of them get educated and become middle class. most of them either accept lower wages (stagnant wages + inflation = lower wages); and a lot of them become unemployed.
GDP is not a measurement of wealth, it's productivity. They are the same as much as distance and speed
The US labor force is basically at full employment. What are you on?
>primarily done by US citizens
yes, but sons of immigrants. ill grant you construction though, thats a pretty even field.
>unemployment rate
that doesn't count all the unemployed people who are NOT LOOKING for work
you really need to look at the labor force participation rate.
Why isn't the US government passing more regulations to make employment of illegals harder?
Why do some people still get paid in cash and all have to do their taxes instead of having a centralized database where employer and employee data is stored?
Why do so many Americans lack a document of identification?
Why isn't car insurance mandatory?
How come a person can have two jobs working 60 hours a week and still have no right to paid vacation?
Why is the US government against mandatory minimum wages and unified labor laws for all states yet gives out food stamps for the working poor?
If they're not looking for a job, then why do you care that they're not working?
Dude, you're so misinformed. Lots of these assertions are downright false.
Enlighten me then but please mind I'm not talking about individual states but the whole US.
- The federal government requires all employers to withhold FICA and income taxes from employees and to report wages to the IRS on the W2 form
- A federal program called E-Verify allows employers to check the immigration status of potential employees.
- As far as I know, all states require car insurance or proof that you're wealthy enough to pay potential liabilities
- A federal minimum wage exists
>gdp growth is more important than the health of the nation
this is our current problem
they aren't rich trust-fund kids living off of their parents. a lot of them are on welfare.
Mass immigration is literally just a scheme by the ultra rich to drive wages and working conditions down while while also increasing their consumerist base, not to mention fracturing any sort of popular unity to prevent the masses from ever rising from their lowly status.
Ironically, immigrationist leftists are the useful idiots of the ultra-rich whom they claim to hate.
Mass immigration raises for most native-born workers in developed countries.
I dont want brown people because I dont want them to.have.my.women and I am.not a cuckhold for.other cultural.groups
If they're not motivated to work because of welfare, then the welfare system need to be reformed to eliminate perverse incentives. What does it have to do with immigrants?
Yes
I stand corrected then, at least partially (paid vacation, mandatory insurance) Since when do those regualations exist?
I don't get Jow Forumsfags. Isn't it easier to believe that people from poor countries just choose to move to better ones?
>treat immigrants like niggers
>immigrants are resentful and dont assimilate
>then get angry when mohamed and his 10 kids dont work and ghetoes start to form and you get stabber like a cuck
Europeans are stupid
Why do we have to house everyone? You don't see the Muslim immigrants going to Saudi Arabia or anything but we have to change the Constitution for these people (you can't be a Saudi citizen if your not Muslim). We can take in 100 million refugees but there's still another 2 billion that we didn't help. We're better off making their countries better and then we can all live in peace.
Wasn't my point, I was just criticizing the conspiracy mindset.
Rich gulf countries are beyond full of Muslim immigrants, by the way. SA is 35% foreign citizens, Qatar and UAE are at about 80%.
Not him but the Aussie user was referring to citizenship not resident ship in the Gulf.
Sa oled see egiptlane?
>why yes, I have given up caring about politics altogether
Also does anybody have an issue of their flag changing because mine seems to display the UK flag instead of the Australian flag sometimes.
Ah, alright. He's right in that, immigrants to the gulf usually never acquire citizenship. There isn't a naturalization process there unlike most of the world, even those who are awarded citizenships for a certain purpose are stripped of that after that purpose has ended, foreign football players for example.
Immigrants to the gulf are treated like dirt in all other ways too because g*lfoids unironically have absolutely no morals.
Jaa.
Ime pole siis, aga mind enam ei koti ka. Las tulevad kõik sisse, äkki seadused muutuvad ka siis minu jaoks paremaks. ;)
why is gdp growth so important
>THINK ABOUT THE GDP!!
So... Europe?
>le
fuck off
>argentinian nazi
Because it means the country has more money to use for any purpose it likes, such as education or infrastructure.
so we need endless immigration to pay for things like healthcare that is constantly becoming more expensive because of all the immigrants
there is zero political possibility to reform welfare, other than a collapse of the system which literally forces either austerity or hyperinflation. There is no ability to, since 60% of american households are net spenders of public money and only 40% are net contributes. The majority is not going to vote to remove the benefits that they receive. However, it is possible to convince both middle-class and poor people to limit immigration.
>Chile
Uhhh.... dude, somewhere at 9,000 Nazis escaped to SA after the war.
>what? you don't want rich people to be even richer by being able to hire abdul instead of you for half the wage? that's nazi man
If you let everyone immigrate into your nation it'll be richer but won't be a nation.
This. It's a porky scam.