Was it the right thing to do or was it an act of evil?
Was it the right thing to do or was it an act of evil?
Bentley Morgan
Jaxson Young
that entire wore was the wrong thing to do
Dylan Phillips
Oliver Lewis
>wore
Jaxson Green
It was the right thing to do, and an act of mercy.
Gabriel Evans
An act of malice. But who cares the japs are okay with it and America is okay with it.
Colton Moore
Two nukes weren't enough.
Easton Collins
>HE USED THE WRONG WORD!
Luke Cook
this
Jordan James
more humane than firebombing
Tyler Brooks
How many would have been the right amount
Jose Anderson
It was Japan who engaged on the war over US north pacific soil, why is the US the bad guys for wanting them to fuck off as soon as possible without having to sacrifice their own men?
Nicholas Torres
one more in kyoto
Asher Harris
Even the Japanese realized this and let Fukushima melt down. 3 NUKES!
Levi Butler
America cucked the shit out of Japan. They even let Jews write their constitution.
Nathan Thompson
Are you dyslexic? That is not just a simple mix up, that is retard tier. This is supposed to be your first language, sharpen up.
Cameron Perry
>implying am*ricans are human and act that way
David Roberts
god I wish the krauts weren't shit at war, then we could have nuked y'all
Grayson White
Most Japs will say they deserved it and lick American boot at every opportunity to apologize for Pearl Harbor.
There's no point in really arguing the morality of it if even the Japs themselves don't give a shit and basically agree with the American view on it.
Samuel Jenkins
Quite honestly, a mix of both.
The first atomic bombing was arguably the right thing to do, far more merciful than the ongoing firebombing campaign and would almost always kill you in an instant. On the other hand, the second one was more in-line with an act of evil. The shockwave of the first bomb's results hadn't made it to Tokyo yet, as most communication networks were destroyed around the city, so they hardly knew of the devastation it had caused. Secondly, the Soviet Invasion of Manchuria and Korea would have made the Japanese more likely to capitulate to the Americans as unlike "the godless communists", the US would be more likely to not ban the monarchy. Although, there was the ticking timebomb the US would have had to worry about if Japan didn't capitulate soon, which was "Operation: Cherry Blossoms at Night" the planned use of chemical weapons on the US mainland's west coast
Zachary King
Surprising thread. Usually Europeans and Latin Americans on Jow Forums call America evil, especially for nuking Japan and such
Joseph Gutierrez
I guess they (rightfully) hate J*pan even more
Zachary Martin
Act of evil. But Japaneses are evil too so I don't care
Nathan Brooks
It was absolutely worth it, the Japanese weren't going to give up their country and their victory so easy. They lost ~100,000 killed during Okinawa with 3 divisions, 4 brigades, and an armoured regiment and that wasn't even the homeland. Just look at the divisions they had on standby in late 1945. Another million or few could've died.
Dominic Morales
They would have surrendered anyway. Atomic bombs were a message to Stalin