The F-35’s logistics system currently has no way for foreign F-35 operators to keep their secret data from being sent...

>actually buying warplanes
>not investing in cyberwarfare

why do military heads keep living in the 20th century. even the pentagon says they have no response to a cyber attack other than a nuclear strike lmao.

Russia definitely has the capability to blitzkrieg Europe. You don't have anything to deploy immediately NATO is propped up by the 4,000 Abrams tanks in Polish warehouses and the airfields we own all over Germany.

Why doesn't anybody appreciate the Gripen?

what about turning the computer off?

>Russia definitely has the capability to blitzkrieg Europe.
No it doesn't.

yeah bro just turn off the computer in your car

I like it but you should make a fifth gen fighter

Attached: tanks.png (635x316, 12K)

if you turned a computer off in a plane, the whole plane would plummet to the ground.

electronic and cyber warfare is the cheapest and most effective method of fighting modern warfare.

90% of those are T-55s rusting away in storages since the fall of the USSR. Look at Russia's GDP. They even have to import night vision devices from Europe. Saying they're a realistic threat to Europe is nothing but an excuse for US military presence here.

jokes on you my car doesn't even have AC or a CD player
I still don't see how cyber attacks should be able to penetrate airplanes or the electrical grid. Why would you connect them to the internet in the first place?

And it still doesn't have any competition in the 5th gen field.
And solely because of this, it still utterly annihilates anything else. Really makes you think.

Lmfao at those vatnik fantasies, most of them are trashcans rotting in piles.
Russia's actual operational tanks that are viable for modern conflict are far far less than that.
>b-but a tank is a tank it will do it's job
Yeah tell that to all the dabbed on T-80s in Chechnya.

Attached: 1560239817933.jpg (583x707, 79K)

>Russia definitely has the capability to blitzkrieg Europe
Russia is barely keeping it together fighting some drunken Hohols in Eastern Ukraine, they couldn't conquer whole of Europe. Not to mention why would they?

That already was corrected a while ago.

>ALIS meets data sovereignty requirements. Late last year, some customers requested that the F-35 enterprise develop additional capability to enable more data control.

>We rolled out the additional Sovereign Data Management tool to international F-35 operators earlier this year, which allows them to manage aspects of their data that is sent to the F-35 Hybrid Production Support Integration (HPSI) team – and early feedback from the fleet is positive. It is also important to note that this has no impact to mission performance or safety of flight.

Electronic warfare is already used to jam radars and communication systems.

The f-35 in particular uses advanced communication systems with Navy ships to relay the position of other aircrafts and enemy positions. This information is then relayed back to other f-35s for operational awareness. This system could easily be infiltrated to reveal the position of your own vehicles or perhaps send false information.

You don't need to be connected to the internet for cyber warfare to be effective.

yeah you're right
Your car has a computer that measures the air/fuel mixture 1000 times a second and adjusts accordingly to have the cleanest and most efficient burn. If you've ever driven in anything older than 1980 then you'd notice that older cars start like shit and have to be warmed up. That's because there is no computer and there is too much air in relation to the cold fuel. Same goes for altitude because there is less air the higher you go, so the computer compensates by letting more air in.

It's kind of previous. Good for the price but many countries want to spend money on something more advanced. SAAB also just pulled the E from Swiss trials.

>not air gaping critical systems.

people want their data and contorls everywhere in real time. Can't have that when things are not connected.

A fighter jet isn't a consumer product

Not yet anyway

>>The F-35’s logistics system currently has no way for foreign F-35 operators to keep their secret data from being sent to the United States.

I thought it was an unofficial feature, like when you buy cisco routers.

>its impossible to transgress air gaps

lmao hackers get pass air gaps all the time.

>hacking into a closed circuit without physically tapping into it
lol no

>oh its time to do maintenance of flight control systems
thats where u get fucked.

That's some James Bond shit

you have no idea what u are talking about.
people need to maintain their systems. there is no such thing as a permanent air gap. people know this and thats why they wait for the gap to be closed by the operator itself. in fact, there are less defended systems that alert an operator when a maintenance should be done. A hacker could maliciously signal an operator to conduct a maintenance test just to close any air gaps.

Look at the pentagon's reports on why air gaps aren't bullet proof.

wired.com/story/air-gap-researcher-mordechai-guri/

I mean why they arent expecting this in the first place?

i really really hope they replace hornets with gripens instead of those lockheed pieces of shit