Why yes, I am an Anarcho-Monarchist, how could you tell?

>Why yes, I am an Anarcho-Monarchist, how could you tell?

Attached: 1560405914320.png (1833x953, 1.17M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-bpesC_FPFc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Anarcho-Monarchist. I could totally imagine an anglo saying this unironically.

Fuck the laws m8 but god bless the queen.

have sex bruv

Attached: hqdefault(8).jpg (480x360, 22K)

take the stateless crownpill

Attached: 1474222677942.png (800x268, 102K)

For me, it's Nazbol.

how does this work? lots of monarchs running around?

People live in an anarchy but voluntarily subordinate themselves to a monarch.

there could be, the monarch(s) are not a state but simply make sure no states

based

Attached: 0648b75f3af0fcb438ccd7aa6ac0f1500e7b211690f287c49ed46eac3e848871_1.jpg (320x449, 31K)

Attached: anmon.jpg (1080x1060, 414K)

Gypsies are stateless but have their own monarchs. I guess something like this.

For example we have a King of the Polish Gipsies.

Bros I think this is the political ideology for me

Anarcho-Monarchism defeats the purpose of a monarchy. If the state of man is hierarchical, and the monarch is seen as the more just ruler than the democratically elected politician, then he ought to be given monopoly over the state (granted that a constitution and members of parliament representing the people are there to keep the balance of power). Moreover, the monarchist believes in the need for the state to preserve the social contract, whereas the anarchist holds an idealistic position regarding the supposed altruism of man. Anarchists are brainlets and they will never amount to anything. Point and laugh.

Every man a king

ah I see that you too bare a l o n g benis

come home king
have sex

Nice retort

>My political ideology is

Attached: 1552359182593.jpg (906x1024, 91K)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Attached: 1200px-HueyPLongGesture.jpg (1200x1325, 296K)

>I
>7 different people sharing a lower body
I could tell from this clear case of schizophrenia

Attached: wosh.jpg (330x412, 13K)

Monarchism is based in the belief that the king should lead because he's the fucking king.
Anarchism is based on the opposition of structure and hierarchy as detractors from individual freedom.
This means that Anarcho-Monarchists believe that those they recognize as king should lead them, but he can't appoint representatives of himself or establish an administration.

Attached: 1560171182793.png (1080x1920, 760K)

Good evening

Attached: graham-patricia-piccinini-_dezeen_2364_col_0.jpg (2364x1574, 853K)

thank you based intellectual
big mcthankies from mcspankies

They speak in unison

nah the monarch is still in charge but they just can't violate my NAP lmao

watch this faggot: youtube.com/watch?v=-bpesC_FPFc

NO THANKS LOL

that comment goes to show your inability to change your framework of mind. Even if you went through the whole thing in disagreement, your own position would have likely been strengthened. You are an intellecually dishonest faggot.

Maybe he just doesn't want the algorithm filling his recommended videos with EVROPA?

They are the seven kings of Rome. Show some respect

reminder that Tolkien and Bane? were anarcho-monarchists

Attached: 1505910833820.png (4712x1472, 634K)

literally use incognito problem solved

exactly, based if i do say so myself

>watch my jewtube video or you're a cuck also i'm taking everything you say seriously because i'm a Jow Forumstard autist with no sense of sarcasm
A FUCKING LEAF

Attached: 1560904278203.jpg (250x221, 12K)

Everything you say is completely incoherent?

your assumption regarding the sancitity of the nap is unfounded

based and tolkienpilled

Attached: 136483929.jpg (599x625, 47K)