LINK Technical Discussion

This faggot gets it. REAL businesses run on regulations and contracts enforced by courts of LAW, nationally as well as internationally. Holy shit, blockchain ain't shit in a real world usecase.

Why can't you brainlets understand this? OH RIGHT - you never had a REAL job in a corporation above flipping burgers. MBAs, JDs and anyone else who has just a bit of edumacation you sorely lack, understands this and is laughing their ass off about crypto.

Damn, you know your shit.
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning.

The LINK shills are awfully quiet when they get called out

I'm going to shamelessly self bump until I get a decent explanation of how LINK is intended to work

AH NUUUUUU CHEEKI BREEKI IV DAMKE

Thank you for your input - you guys are doing great proving my point

Clearly LINK is literally only a memecoin coordinated by discord shills. Mods should really make a sticky to warn new comers

dyor fag, buy it or don't. claiming it will rely completely on ethereum to exist is weak fud. claiming mainnet will be clogged with bugs is an unfounded assumption. thinking that a buggy mainnet is a bad thing is also weak fud. saying it will be difficult to write to btc core says more about btc core than link.

Attached: middle-finger.jpg (400x400, 18K)

you need to go back. is summer almost over?

Terrible fud. But I've been here for a long time so I can spot it easy.