This is Australia

I take it you have given up on your futile quest? Good to know, another victory for me.

Read the definition of rodent.
Does a spider fit that definition?
Do you know what a spider is?
It's fine if you just didn't know what the word rodent meant since I'm assuming English isn't your first language, but if you actually think a spider is a rodent then I'd love to hear your reasoning.

*tips fedora*

If a spider SO CLEARLY is not a rodent, then why is this the 3rd post in a row, in which you've deflected and refused to prove spiders aren't rodents?
Don't put the burden of proof of me, I asked you to prove your hypothesis and you are the one making the claim. Go on.

Netherlands isn't a country, its just sort of Germans that live in a swamp

I did prove it by posting the definition of rodent which a spider clearly does not fall in to

B&R

C&B

Posting a definition of rodent is not a proof that spiders aren't rodents.

yes it is because spiders don't fit that definition

Why you don't quote me ????????
Just got out your siesta ?? Still tired uh ??

Prove it.

C&B

Prove it. You repeat that mantra, but you haven't proven shit.

Define the spider, define a rodent, that's all he's asking for you doofus

I can't make you read and use your brain to make comparisons. You have to do that part yourself

you mean he wants me to describe animals to him like in kindergarten when you learn basic facts about farm animals and insects? I'm pretty sure he know the differences between a spider and a mouse

What a nice spider, doing a cats work I see.

Sure but he wants a logical output of your claims, that's his whole autistical point itt, are you an autist yourself for not understanding it ?

So you can't prove it. I win.

>Prove that a spider isn't a rodent

Attached: gigachad says....png (1068x601, 306K)

I think you're autistic for actually underdstanding his autism but ok here we go

>a spider isn't a member of the order rodentia
>a spider isn't a mammal
>rodents are characterized by having a single pair of continuously growing incisors in the upper and lower jaw
>a spider has literally zero of these qualities

all this information was found in the picture I originally posted

Spiders are rodents

i remember mum very nearly crashed the car just after we left home because a huntsman dropped from the visor
supposedly it's a common cause of accidents but i just had the one

why did you reply so many times?

I'm bored and my gf is ignoring me and I have no friends and a spider is CLEARLY not a rodent

It is not clear to me

>CLEARLY not a rodent
Debatable

>a spider isn't a member of the order rodentia
Can you prove me an exhaustive list of the members of the order rodentia? This claim of yours requires some corroboration.
>a spider isn't a mammal
If you make an outrageous claim like this, the least you could do is provide some evidence. Why aren't spiders mammals? Are all of the millions of species of spiders not mammals? Are spiders per definition not mammals? Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the spider in question is not an undiscovered mammalian variation of the arachnid persuasion?
>rodents are characterized by having a single pair of continuously growing incisors in the upper and lower jaw, a spider has literally zero of these qualities
Can you provide me with the spider's dental records to validate this assertion? Otherwise this is just another baseless claim.

I rest my case.

He's underage for sure, kind of cute in a silly, wholesome way honestly

>Can you prove me
*provide me with

literally me wtf

this was fun and if I wasn't dead tired I'd continue on but I gotta get up early. Thanks for the chuckles netherbro
and yes you win, spiders are rodents

heh... I win..yo gano..

Quality thread everyone, i'm proud of you

He won

Best thread by far in a while.

>tfw no delicious land-lobsters hanging from the wall in my cuntry

I love to watch international match!
France vs Australia!!

I'll never look at spiders the same way again.

>spiders have eight legs
>rodents have four legs
therefore; spiders cannot be rodents, and rodents cannot be spiders.

netherlands: 1
australia: 0

Attached: a5387c0d81327d00e6a3a9d44179c90bdc96eab11d7e155e272457b36e6df943.png (1246x1488, 594K)

we got used to them and became aussies

What you're asking is like "prove 0 doesn't equal 1". It's dumb.

Silly Australian, of course Spider is a rodent, can't you tell?

What if a spider had an accident, and only has 4 legs now, is it a rodent?

I believe the classification is based off the original specimen, and thus his species does not change due to severed limbs

>species classification exists
>discrete species exist
>nature has set life up to be sorted into nice neat piles

Attached: 1560337741586.jpg (728x728, 246K)

Prove the Netherlands is not African.

do you have any proof to support this statement?

giga cope