Why is it that NWO conspiracy theorists who hate globalisation are the exact same people who are the early adopters of...

Why is it that NWO conspiracy theorists who hate globalisation are the exact same people who are the early adopters of borderless currency? Shouldn't the "anti-globalism" crowd be fanatically against crypto and endorsing their own national currency?

Attached: 201605301214018acf1_550.jpg (550x309, 30K)

Because they are stupid people. Look at your average "crypto enthusiast" they are smart technical blah blah blah... but when you can just look at a lot of them and tell them they don't have a lick of common sense or critical thinking skills.

There's a difference between being dumb and being stupid.

The reality is the libertarian types don't really understand libertarianism. And they are easily exploited by TPTB do accept their cashless currency.

yes but they are brainlets

They get hooked by the fact that they can make money off of it.... and then also think it'll bring on a revolution, when instead they are being hoodwinked into becoming slaves in reality.

I'm a huge gold and silver person. Gold and silver is real money.....

When the United States started issuing dollars backed by gold. You didn't earn say 50$ of dollars and then expect it 8 years later to be able to buy you a house.

Real sound money is just preserved.

I've personally come to accept that at some point there will be a need for a world government. And that death and destruction is necessary to advance human civilization into a new paradigm. Oh well.

Because bankers / IMF leaders and other upper echelon types are able to exert a huge amount of control through financial systems, regulations, and policies. Usually in tandem with the relevant government officials in their pockets. If people were to drop the status quo and change to a peer to peer currency system, this balance of power would be disrupted. That being said, cryptocurrencies could end up working in their favor if the flippening were to happen and the new standard universal currency were to be something that (((they))) have a majority control over.
I also think it is very telling that groups such as the SEC are quite bullish on crypto - which the mainstream news will never report about. The only thing they do is either try to bait normies into investing at the ATH of each cycle, and use appeal to authority figures like Bill Gates and Buffet to tell you that bitcoin is like rat poison or harvesting baby brains.

I'm a NWO conspiracy theorist whos for bitcorn because unlike any countries' fiat, more can't be created at will, which the global elite benefit from anyway

and use appeal to authority figures like Bill Gates and Buffet to tell you that bitcoin is like rat poison or harvesting baby brains during good buy in periods*

So, basically this. But also because much like love and hate, human greed knows no bounds.

The elite also know about the Streisand Effect, user. They’re not dummies.

This is correct - they aren't dummies and the streisand effect can backfire. This is why I believe they do give crypto a bit of attention when prices are high. If enough people buy it and get burned by it, they'll disregard the entire industry as a scam until (((they))) find out a way to make it the norm on their own terms.

Would you support nationally bounded cryptocurrencies though? A crypto where wallets were linked to "proof of citizenship" so that they could only be traded among and between citizens of your own country?

It depends. The wallets being linked to proof of citizenship could also be vulnerable to an authoritarian government who could abuse peoples rights, deny access to anyone not stepping in line etc.
It could also have privacy vulnerabilities.

If I was able to see the source code of this national cryptocurrency and check for myself that it had no vulnerabilities then sure I'd support it

But why? I don't see how that sort of limiting parameter would be better than globally useful money.

A nationally bound currency only usable by white citizens of a white ethnostate would make it harder or impossible for foreign countries to attack economically.

Now that I think about it I wouldnt give two shits about a national bound cryptocurrency in a mulitculti or third world country

Gay. Decentralization is far better. Im doing my very best to ensure nation states survive and that will then spawn separate galactic empires.

(Chinks jews and niggers will not be allowed to leave)

decentralization leads to centralization with the current state of human intelligence period. thinking it doesn't is ignoring all of history, everything that happens around you, and the mass amount of normies that can't function without someone telling them what to do

I don't think bitcoin is inherently more of a borderless currency than gold is, at least in principle, it's just easier to lug around, break into appropriate pieces to buy things, and can be used directly by computer networks. Just about any entity of different scales being able to issue currencies backed by easily verifiable bitcoin reserves is well within the realm of possibility should it be necessary, and certainly doesn't require a world government or dissolution of borders.

>why do people who dislike the idea of big government control want a currency that's not controlled by a government?
Well fuck OP I don't know

Crypto is the ultimate anti globalist monetary system since nobody owns its. The code runs itself.

>The code runs itself.
Actually, mining companies run it.

And how is a global monetary system anti-globalist exactly?

there WILL be globalisation
the question is what form of globalisation there will be

because we are taking away power from the banks and the elite.

and george soros hates bitcoin. that means it is a threat to his globalist agenda.

wake up.

bitcoin is as globalist as it gets

thats how you know we are going to $1M

its been ordained by (((them)))

bears are dumb as fuck

>what is fudding to accumulate

Gloablisation = centralisation

I don’t want a bunch of Jews from America to control the world. Decentralising currency takes this power away from them to some extent. The Pound, Euro, Yen and their markets are all heavily tied to the dollar and therefore to America.