67 banks live, 119 in implemenation phase

How can you not be all-in in Chainlink?

Attached: SWIFT global payments innovation (gpi).png (1586x847, 132K)

Other urls found in this thread:

masimatteo.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/ciscolive_deploying-enterprise-blockchains.pdf
swift.com/our-solutions/global-financial-messaging/payments-cash-management/swift-gpi/swift-gpi-document-centre
aa-debtor.smartcontract.com/bonds
cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/digital-transformation/blockchain-whitepaper.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Not all of us are deluded retards.

How can you be sure this is related to LINK?

that symbol for the connector....

2500 EOY

Attached: 1534435870113.png (875x1010, 396K)

>he thinks this is somewhat related to chainlink

Attached: 1531674720274.png (600x512, 298K)

kek you based retards

>10743837
>10743843

Exactly my though. This "connector" is soo similar to the new Chainlink figures on chain.link

I refuse to believe in a coincident here. Also, it is similar to the *new* figures, not the old once that could have come from PoC.

You seen the black Cisco Cube?

masimatteo.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/ciscolive_deploying-enterprise-blockchains.pdf

Attached: E90D1D70-E7AD-44B1-AE9E-88CBC07C1255.jpg (524x502, 15K)

Also Chainlink. GG

Also, some DLT PoC mentioned for SWIFT GPI in 2017. Wonder what that was. Faggot.

Attached: SWIFT GPI PoC in 2017.png (1594x860, 132K)

Link me the document sir

swift.com/our-solutions/global-financial-messaging/payments-cash-management/swift-gpi/swift-gpi-document-centre

They’re both IC3 partners ;)

Attached: 28C69AEA-0862-4B88-BBE5-7AD878208B90.jpg (640x1053, 239K)

>cypherium
>literal ico scam
How is IC3 good?

>not a single mention of chainlink

you people have brain damage

They are also balls deep in Hyperledger

Attached: AFD22055-52E6-4236-A7A1-AEC3703E1B78.jpg (274x447, 88K)

he doesn’t realize the shadowfork wasn’t a meme

A sign of autism is you have zero imgination, and everything has to be concrete in front of your eyes.

I pity you really.

scientism has ruined us in ways we cannot even apprehend

: 500001+ LINK
- Lieutenant General: 250001-500000 LINK
- Major General: 175001-250000 LINK
- Brigadier General: 125001-175000 LINK
- Colonel: 750001-125000 LINK
- Lieutenant Colonel: 50001-75000 LINK
- Major: 35001-50000 LINK
- Captain: 25001-35000 LINK
- First Lieutenant: 20001-25000 LINK
- Second Lieutenant: 15001-20000 LINK
XXX
- Sergeant Major: 10001-15000 LINK
- Master Sergeant: 9001-10000 LINK
- Sergeant First Class: 7501-9000 LINK
- Staff Sergeant: 5001-7500 LINK
- Sergeant: 3501-5000 LINK
- Corporal: 1501-3500 LINK
- Specialist: 501-1500 LINK
- Private: 1-500 LINK

>Colonel
reporting in

Try keep it to less than 7 threads down syndrome bag holders

Newly promoted Sergeant Major reporting in.

>Lieutenant Colonel
Reporting in

>Colonel: 750001
very cool number

s-specialist reporting in, becoming a corporal on Monday though

how do I buy black cisco cubes

Private, reporting in, commander

Attached: rank.png (496x409, 34K)

Checked and kek'd

>unable to understand subtlety, pick up on social queues, or anything else that isn't dumbed down to the level of a 5 year old

The "connector" symbol is literally a CHAIN LINK.
They're spoonfeeding normie retards at this point... holy shit.

/thread

I’m more interested in this. How can Cisco make a true decentralized network . They can’t. Those blue hexes. Also Cisco is working with salesforce , Nintex, seal software. When I was researching it a few months ago they were interested in smart contracts / intelligent contracts . Interesting for sure

Attached: 8AB6BB78-786F-4D90-8159-C838C41C9C64.jpg (798x692, 247K)

Can somebody ask Rory why did chainlink decide to change to a hexagon logo? I’m quite curious

they wanted to be more professional. the new logo was changed months ago. its not new

Obviously. But every design requires thought. Their must be a reason why they radically decided to change it. It’s not just “it looks cool” type of deal

A little far fletched

Tesseract > Cube. It looks more professional, is simpler, and is deeper.

Why would they use a rip-off like this? A cube with chains? Are you kidding me.

From the very beginning they had planned to update the logo to something more simple. I love the meme cube, but it’s a clunky design that doesn’t scale well.

I can't say much. Just know that all of your estimates for LINK's price post-singularity are way too conservative. Bitcoins market cap combined with ETH's market cap doesn't even begin to scrape how large LINK's market cap will be once the oracle problem is solved and everything is put in to place. Anything under $7 is a steal.

For all the newfags, Link has nothing to do with swift gpi, their PoC was about Bond Payments which has been confirmed by rory last Year.
Ask him or Search for the Chat.
Still $1000 EOY

Attached: 1509553052231.png (464x441, 27K)

I'm all in on Chainlink but SWIFTgpi does not use blockchain whatsoever so obviously this doesn't use Chainlink.

Checked, we all make it

this guy is right.

Lt. General here.

#3 EOY

dont miss this thread fellow niggers:
we iz gon maek it

>I'm all in on Chainlink
how does it feel to throw away your money?

>776
oh god why, this trips would've made me so much happy
anyway
#1 Bitcoin
#2 Ethereum
#3 Chainlink

as the prophecy predicts

1. Chainlink
2. Ethereum
3. Bitcoin

It’s inevitable

>he doesn't know yet

aa-debtor.smartcontract.com/bonds

Attached: 1526020321003.jpg (1000x1000, 120K)

Holy shit
We are actually unironically literally gonna make it?

If you come to biz and dont have a stack of Link you must be a moron.

Corporal here, keep at it, marine. I need be a Second Lietenant before the singularity

Double dubz will have to do

>Sergeant
fuck..

Attached: -Sad001.jpg (500x322, 35K)

I'm going to go to Cisco Live in March 2019, specifically going to any blockchain events. If it isn't announced what they're doing by then, I'll be asking what open source software they're working with and what software connects to legacy systems.

March is so far away though

cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/digital-transformation/blockchain-whitepaper.pdf


"To further simplify ease of use and accelerate enterprise adoption,
the blockchain platform architecture defines a middleware and
connector interface that integrates with existing centralized enterprise
systems as well as other blockchain networks. This is achieved
via a library of native and third-party application connectors and
middleware, made available via a developer marketplace."

I would say you will be able to use chainlink if you think it suits.

>cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/digital-transformation/blockchain-whitepaper.pdf

Middleware and connectors
To further simplify ease of use and accelerate enterprise adoption,
the blockchain platform architecture defines a middleware and
connector interface that integrates with existing centralized enterprise
systems as well as other blockchain networks. This is achieved
via a library of native and third-party application connectors and
middleware, made available via a developer marketplace.

Checked
Chainlink $5586 EOY