Sure, Chainlink has decent potential if they can secure the partnership they "claimed" to have. Right now there's no confirmation of partnership from the other side yet. And it's success depends entirely on usage.
Speaking of which, Chainlink is not the only oracle product on the market AFAIK. Oraclize, a pioneer in this field, already has a working product with dozens of enterprise customers EVERYDAY. Iota Qubic will enable native oracle function. Btw, it is also possible for ETH developers to fork Chainlink and replicate it natively?
It's good to have Accord working on the legal side of thing, which is overlooked by a lot of projects in the cryptospace. But things in the legal world don't change overnight. It might easily take 3-5 years for the rules and regulations to come in place, and who knows what the price of BTC, ETH, XRP, etc will be.
Yeah a russian philosophy major is gonna solve the oracle problem, biggest ico money grab i have seen in my life, and i have been in crypto since 2014
Nathan Wood
3.
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.
The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.
I would advise everyone to stay far away from this coin. A dodgy two man Russian team who have already gone through the majority of the $32 million ico money. they registered the business in the cayman islands so they could avoid legal scrutiny. be warned.
Connor Ortiz
6.
Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.
Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.
Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.
The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.
In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team
Ethan Brooks
So is this pasta or a legit warning
Samuel Ward
Today, OP was not a faggot.
Ethan Gray
Nice try but none of us are selling faggot. Not our fault you missed the bottom.
Honestly, you guys don't even know how big REQ will be. By this time next year, your life will change dramatically, and for the better.
All you have to do is keep holding. And buy more, while you can. These prices are a gift, a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. We found out about this way too early. It will be so surreal when you start seeing this in advertisements on television, and on fliers in banks, and when you hear famous news anchors mention it by name. REQ will be used in payment requests at McDonald's and public accounting ledgers.
You will feel a genuine sense of pride. This is what it looks like to buy in the early stages, before it's on anyone else's radar. This is what it looks like to do your due diligence. This is what it means to invest in a big thing before it's big. You will make it.
Is Jow Forums actually this retarded? I knew it was bad but I didn't realize it was this bad. Unironically fucking cringed so hard at these posts. It wasn't even the type of cringe that you just slightly wince at. No, this is a whole new level of cringe to the point I needed to take a step back from my fucking keyboard and pace around for a few minutes contemplating on how abhorrent and downright embarrassing something like this is. Do you have any idea the level of retardation and pure lack of awareness a person needs just to make such brainlet statements like these? Downright embarrassing, cringe, bluepilled, and horrifying at how low IQ this place is.
Tyler Walker
you're copy pastas won't bring the price down, retard
Kevin Jackson
Are you the guy who said the top 4 coins are vetech btc eth and one other I cant think of? If so Thank you for the info you gave me the other day( I asked a bunch of info about the market).
how low do you need it to go to break even, 4300 sats? 4250?
Eli Wood
Here is a useful reminder for all you faggots >1 billion tokens >anons meme for almost a year that link will be worth x amount by x date >every prediction is wrong >people will small bags (less than 25k) are convincex their bag isn't small because they believe link is going to $100 in the next 12-24 months >these stinky linkies hold >the anons who create the price memes sell every pump and buy back low >while you held on to your link when it went to .80c, these anons quadrupled their stack >many anons now have bags of 100k+ link >they will dump all the way up, many will even continue to accumulate Link will never be worth more than $20. Look at the supply for NEO. This is not antshares 2.0. You literally need 100k to have a chance of making it with link. Don't hold your bag like a trench brain when there are low supply projects that have the potential to save you from wage slavery. I'm seriously trying to help you.
Parker Baker
Perfect, thank you
Andrew Wright
4chanBiz CopyPaste #6
A drawback of an anonymous image board is that people who are selfish, dishonest or otherwise undesirable can’t be avoided. If you give forum to the best thought you must also tolerate the worst. A common example of this is small people finding out about a project or idea put forth by great people. They then make it “theirs” in a desperate effort to have some kind of identity outside of the poor one they’ve earned. Those people then spend their time trying to keep others away from “their” idea or project in hopes that the fleeting feeling of worth they are leeching off the idea or project will last. It is, of course, a losing battle. The best way to dissuade this kind of behavior is to point it out directly, just as light causes cockroaches to scatter.
Eli Collins
I've given Linkmarines some A+ prime FUD material, and this is the kind of thanks I get
