/brit/

Attached: 20190627_003206.jpg (470x539, 171K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nypost.com/2019/06/26/woman-dies-while-performing-degrading-webcam-sex-for-perv/
youtube.com/watch?v=-jg9fvOPuqQ
cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/extreme-pornography
twitter.com/AnonBabble

imagine spreading your buttcheeks and taking a giant poo on the queens head

free booze and free food tonight thanks to toilberg

nothing is free in this world

>/brit/

mad how many people I know that don't mind staying late at work if berg gives them an uber eats and a taxi home lmao

Attached: 1561488141886.jpg (638x480, 30K)

thats gross, lad

Image board not link board

>Marx, Engels, Lenin
>?, ?, ?, ?, ?
>Goldman?, ?, Coolidge?, ?, MArtin Luther King
>Bookchin, ?, Chomsky, ?, Bernie Sanders
Can anyone do any better?

>uber eats
what's that
i've heard of uber, taxi malarky

that's different, it's a sort of toilparty in some place toilberg rented. no work involved. happens once a year

yeah, by not listing a bunch of boring dead blokes you fucking nerd

have a good day de lads

Attached: bigmark.jpg (2252x4000, 1.65M)

Serious cope here, you gonna try convince yourself you'd rather be there than home too?

yeah right? who would want to go somewhere with free food and free booze when you could just stay at home and consume the food and booze you've had to pay for?
idiots, that's whom'st

this

I can stay home if I want lol. so no, no cope. those parties are always fun. top notch food and booze, lots of drunk qts. why would I stay home?

Not sure why I waste my time in this general with all of you. It's obvious I'm the only person here who takes culture seriously.

Hahahaha berg has got you by the balls hasn't he!

Attached: Screenshot (14745).jpg (1920x1080, 136K)

some people work with people they get on with. some people go to the pub/restaurant after work anyway so you're getting that but for free lol

It's Uber's food delivery service. Similar business model, but instead of driving people around, they pick up food from wherever you ordered it and deliver it to you. Provides food delivery for business that do not do it themselves. It can be expensive in certain areas.

>It's obvious I'm the only person here who takes culture seriously.

Attached: fedora.jpg (1000x1000, 279K)

some people in this general really can't deal with the idea of other people not having a shit job and shit life can they.

Cope

Attached: 1512415780694.png (300x400, 121K)

Best JRE?

just watched the movie colors about gangs in LA

pretty glad sydney isn't inundated with firearms

having spent heaps of time hanging out with graffiti writers and petty criminals i can defs see how far south things would have gone if they were readily available

indeed, cope.

spencer?

seems like the bitter NEETs are already awake. probably because of the heat

everyone should get fat at least once in their life
not too obese where you destroy your body but just fat.

i avoid getting fat at all costs

not seen this film but looked at that image and said that looks tesigahara hehe

~t. delusional skeletoid or EXTREMELY delusional fatoid

Alex Jones 2: Machine Elves.

>can't.....not
Why do people do this? Sigh.

...

d'aww can your poor wee autistic brain not comprehend double negatives? that's cute

Anyone else notice people who say Cope are usually obviously trying to cope with something. Usually either being a virgin, not having friends, not having a job, or having a shit job.
I don't understand how, in their minds, people who are having sex, have plenty of friends and have a decent job are the ones doing the coping.
I don't get it

Mental how brown devolve to tribal warfare at every instance they can

I'M GONNA SAY IT

coping with the dull pain of existence as we all do every day.

Called projection

yea it is. the face of another
pretty decent some really really good scenes. quite unsettling
tatsuya nakadai is a rly good actor

Attached: Screenshot (14603).jpg (1920x1080, 128K)

plenty of dumb white ppl do it too man, e.g football hooligans in england, graffiti gangs (at least kinda in the height of it mid 200s) in aus etc etc etc

to them, being a "neurotypical" - which basically means well-functioning human - is something that should be scorned
literally just because they can never have it
it's like yanks who argue in favour of circumcision or people who argue against monogamy

absolute state

Diego copealoné

Attached: 1559056411027.jpg (1125x2001, 230K)

Why negate a former negative? Just state the proposisiton positively?

>Very few people in this general can deal with the idea of others having a good job and good life

Wait, I thought the "extreme" image porn thing was just a law that said you can't produce it in the UK? Just read an article about a bloke that got 15 months inside for it.

postnumber
text
redditspace
>greentext

that means something else though

are you stupid?

Yeah but the thing is, white people hate other white people that do that.
To the browns its just "Letting off" or "Being hard".
Not that all browns like the behavior, but there are large sects of their culture that approve of that sort of behavior. Which they somehow dont realize are the antithesis to a prosperous society.
Thats why they have to move to other countries to succeed.

It means the same thing.
No?

Because you don't have any of those things are you're larping in a fucking British culture general

Post a link then you absolute pin head

this. why would you spend any extended time in this god awful general if had a decent life.

nypost.com/2019/06/26/woman-dies-while-performing-degrading-webcam-sex-for-perv/
>He was separately convicted of possession of extreme pornographic images in January 2019 and jailed for 15 months.

>Very few people in this general can deal with the idea of others having a good job and good life
because that says something different to
>some people in this general really can't deal with the idea of other people not having a shit job and shit life can they.

>very few
>some people
two wildly different amounts at the opposite end of things
it just doesn't work
plus "can't" and "not" are a lot more effective and allow the writer to put more emphasis on what's being said
whereas
>Very few people in this general can deal with the idea of others having a good job and good life
comes across as a poncy statement the likes of which you'd see in a philosopher's musings

I have two of those things.
Most people have at least one.
If you have none, you are the one coping.

>what is emphasis

saying there aren't many people who can is fundamentally different to saying there are certain people who can't

that's the least of your worries desu

Imageboard not link board

youtube.com/watch?v=-jg9fvOPuqQ

I want to eat her pussy while she quietly tests my general knowledge

don't understand this post

would you rather I screen shot the entire article?

You fucking eejit.
Might as well worry about split infinitives.
If what you're saying is true, you might as well say that saying "the hospitals not having medicine is a bad thing" is grammatically wrong, and that "the hospitals having medicine is a good thing" is the "right" way to say the same thing.

Hmmm
I reckon maybe he would have got a slap on the wrist for that, had he not been wanking off to a girl dying in front of him.
Might even have been a bit more lenient had he made any attempt at all to get her help or at least inform someone.
You have to imagine if he had a parking ticket, the judge would have probably jailed him for that too.

people choose the weirdest hills to die on the internet don't they? hehe

Okay. How about changing
>some people in this general really can't deal with the idea of other people not having a shit job and shit life can they.
For
>some people in this general really can't deal with the idea of other people having a good job and good life can they.
You keep the same quantifier but get rid of the double negative?
I don't see how the emphasis is being lost here.
Okay. That's true.

Yes exactly.

cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/extreme-pornography

I don't think that's a double negative to be honest. "Not" and "Bad" are different.

I would argue that having a good job and not having a shit job are also not opposites but we're getting into semantics now

Britain is a socialist country OK x

That was a separate offense, what makes you think any of that came out in the trial if they were still investigating it? I would look up other convictions if I could be arsed. One of you should though since I'm sure at least one of you is holding.

Good point.

Attached: here you are then.jpg (657x1969, 466K)

not having a shit job and a shit life =/= having a good job and a good life

>don't see how emphasis is being lost
this isn't a negative thing but are you autistic? autistic people usually struggle with anything that has more abstract meaning/intention. To an autistic person basic rhetorical devices have less effect.

Seen it already.

toil isn’t that bad just underpaid
could be better could be worse

Why does Alan try larp as a Brit? We're fucking FULL

Good point.
No but I am beta.

snuff porn is illegal to possess, yes

at least you admit you're wrong I guess

Yeah fair enough.
In that case I reckon it was some pretty fucking extreme porn, I am assuming either rape or snuff.

wasn't there a load of other weird shit that came with that legislation like female ejaculation? I seem to recall that and other strange stuff.

very pleased dave has adopted a name so he can be filtered now x

Facesitting and squirting.
Those were the ones that were only illegal to produce here, highly doubt possessing things like that would get you 15 months in jail

Hot

>wasn't there a load of other weird shit that came with that legislation like female ejaculation?
yes, but the law's been changed regarding production of that stuff so it's less silly and it's fine so long as all parties are consenting and it's not causing gbh iirc

>what're you in for?
took a selfie while nose-deep in a bird's trouser-trumpet, didn't I?

You won't filter me, lad.
No one ever filters anyone, not unless they're continuously flooding.
I know you'll ignore this post to pretend you did in fact filter me
But really, you didn't

>Few hospitals can deal with the idea of not having enough medicine
>Most hospitals can't deal with the idea of not having enough medicine

Anyway, what the first guy said wasn't even a double negative, because the "can't" part wasn't being undone by the "not". The "not" modifies the logic of "having a shit job and shit life", not the logic of "can't".
The problem of double negatives is like in maths where you multiply two negatives and get a positive - it's the same as if you just used positives from the start. It's not even necessarily a double negative when you have can't and not right next to each other rather than on the other sides of the same sentence:
>dogs can't not be dogs

wtf this potato is destroying an english lad, not sure how I feel about this