No swift

Why doyou assholes care so much? Link is goong to the moon

See pic. Whoopsie!
Good luck swing trading though.

They're swing trading.

Attached: accord partners with chainlink.png (895x617, 105K)

>cucked by open source partners (lol)
>cucked by potentional customers
LINKIES JUST CANT CATCH A BREAK

Attached: 1534666893827.jpg (636x862, 100K)

>Fizzy saying they're looking at Chainlink is now fud

Attached: 1340921389074.jpg (300x360, 66K)

They have looked and they keep looking because they are not interested.
You got nothing of substance

Jow Forums Chainlink प्रतिलिपि 3.6

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Eth hit. Happy gambling though anons

>because they are not interested.
lmao, if you say so

Let's be honest here, at what price did you swing traders sell at? 4k sats? 3k sats? Oh no no no you sold at 2.5k sats didn't you hahahaha
No wonder the FUD is so desperate these last few weeks. All these "traders" got cucked and sold low.

I sold most my stack $1 and have been trading the whole way down
my average cost is literally below zero. how are those bags treating you? reddit tier hodler

Delusional

level 8 as well. See you in the 5

Attached: PicsArt_08-13-05.05.46.jpg (500x593, 86K)

Solid month of gains.

Attached: 1518112770293.jpg (392x434, 263K)

we outchea

Attached: 1532474448771.jpg (301x336, 80K)

We are now moving into Divine Realisation Era or DRE. If you hold 1k link you will be able to seek out APIs with your mind and subconsciously connect them to smart contracts. Your link reward payments will be beamed directly into your body and your will be able to buy lambos simply by waving your hand in front of the salesman. Each lambo will be charged at 0.1 link and automatically debited from your mind.
This is not a shill, it has been confirmed in telegram.