Do europoors understand that we'll steamroll them when mutts are gone into anarchy/civil war?

Do europoors understand that we'll steamroll them when mutts are gone into anarchy/civil war?

Attached: 1561831219057.jpg (1024x677, 92K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=kVo5I0xNRhg
youtu.be/JTciZbouPug?t=417
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Kukliński)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

America is stronger than ever now with Aztec blood. Whitoids are faggots.

Russia wouldn't even get through Poland

You'll die of cirrhosis sooner than it would happen, Ivan.
Based

I'd be building a bugout cabbage cellar and pray to lenin's mummy Chechyans dont steamroll you first, Sascha.

Attached: Amir Khattab.jpg (256x192, 6K)

Every time
Last time you subhumans barely escaped genocide

Attached: 1561718314992.png (1257x732, 264K)

You can't even occupy Ukraine.

in WW2 we fought alone against the world
if Russia attacked Europe now it would be the world vs Russia

>impact of climate change on gdp
>russia +~20%
woah you now have an economy worth $120 instead if 100

Aztec were the weakest fags ever though. They lost against 600 Europeans

Kek , delusional retard. Nato could easily rape you with or without the USA

>we'll steamroll them

lol

There aren't enough Chechens alive to "steam-roll" a single Russian city.

why are russians such loyal slaves to their oligarch overlords?

Ignore delusional Polacks

Vodka keeps them calm. Not even kidding, every time the upper classes tried to limit the alcohol consumption in russia, the country collapsed.

Considering a Finnish farmer managed kill 500 of you guys, I have doubts.

Attached: 6E6E05BE-E414-442A-9110-19DDA5320562.jpg (438x502, 32K)

Ivan the only thing you'll steamroll is a bottle of vodka you dumb r*ssian

Your ancestors-rapists have done their job
Spasibo

Attached: 1561834428138.jpg (800x1075, 690K)

Пoжáлyйcтa, Tovarisch.

We'll see about that Igor. The rest of Europe combined is almost as powerful as Finland alone and we could single-handedly beat your third world shithole with ease so Europe should be fine.

>we fought alone
If by "alone" you mean the Wehrmacht, the SS, the occupied countries, the volunteers, the puppet states and your Axis buddies, then yes, you "fought" alone. It was actually the Russians who've fought alone, against the bulk of your army (this includes the Wehrmacht and the SS), some 80% of (which was stationed on the Eastern Front), and against the volunteers, puppet states and the conscripts from the occupied countries, and the best part is, they haven't just pushed you out, dismantle the bulk of your army and humiliate to the point of no return, they would've put you down as well, and if it weren't for their "Allies", who've only launched D-Day because they wanted to prevent Russia from seizing all of Europe.

Although your losses in Yugoslavia were more severe, since you were facing men who were outnumbered, outgunned and outsupplied, and with the support of native traitors to boot. The fact that you've managed to lose all SEVEN offensives in Yugoslavia speaks volumes of how shit you are at war :)). Again, mere Partisans have beaten your professional army, the SS and the local turncoats, whom you've largely trained and supplied.

There is nothing to believe, it's a historical fact, 80% of your entire fighting force which was stationed on the Eastern Front was effectively defeated some 8 MONTHS before D-DAY. Do you understand what that means :))?

no you won't

your entire country has the same gdp as italy and you lost a war to a tiny mountain country

yikes, why did you stop replying in the other thread?
>writes half a page, totally not obsessed tho :))

I like that this guy just made up a bunch of bullshit to get a comfy life in USA and cringe incels like you actually take it seriously.

It's called being literate :)), and dabbling in things you know nothing of is even more subhuman than dead grosspapas :)).

>It's called being literate
great, so you can read up on the Allied naval blockade, air warfare in WW2, the strategic bombing campaign, lend lease, as well as the African, Italian and western fronts

Finland will literally be paradise on earth.

Attached: 6410413174399.jpg (470x470, 13K)

Russia gets weaker too through decades: economically and demographically. Industrial output of Russian Federation measured in tons is comparable with Poland's. So i don't really understand what you base your statement on. The only positive aspect of last 25 years was modernisation of the Russian army: huge and resource-eating soviet collossus with millions of soldiers and archaic organisation was turned into western-tier effective professional army.

No wonder that Germans lost war if they had such allies xD

>It was actually the Russians who've fought alone

Russian army was supplied from screws, through shoes to weapon by the USA/UK through lend-lease, and millions of "liberators" were of non-Russian, usually central-asian nationalities.

:))), the fronts you've mentioned were worthless and the repositioning of the troops stationed there would not have changed a thing on the Eastern Front, which, again, fielded 80% of the Axis' entire army in Europe (not counting the aforementioned "adds"), and the Lend-Lease was accounted for only 6-12% of all resources which the Russians have used during the war, and was necessary for the sole purpose of maintaining the supply-lines, while the Russians were reestablishing their industry in the vicinity of the Caucasus mountain range,to shelter it from your insidious aerial bombardment. The best part is, it was paid for, and the more the Russians were beating you down, the less frequent the Lease became :)).

Cope all you want, but you've lost a war where you've had every POSSIBLE advantage at your disposal, against an enemy that you've caught OFF GUARD by betraying the Non-Aggression Pact that you've cosigned with him, and no amount of revisionism will ever change that :)).

The Lend-Lease was accounted for only 6-12% of all the resources which they've used in that war, and the bulk of was it made available only after the land and sea blockade around Stalingrad was lifted.

>by betraying the Non-Aggression Pact

If Germans didn't attack Soviet Union, then Soviet Union would attack Germany a bit later. It was zero-sum game.

>Do europoors understand that we'll steamroll them when mutts are gone into anarchy/civil war?

Attached: 1558529625806.png (782x758, 127K)

Germany did not have the advantage. Given the crazy goals and ideas of the German leadership, there was almost no way of winning the war.
If you're actually interested in that I recommend the Youtube channel TIK
youtube.com/watch?v=kVo5I0xNRhg

>Given the crazy goals and ideas of the German leadership, there was almost no way of winning the war.

Germany lost the WW2 already in the end of 1940 when it was clear for everyone that Third Reich lost the battle of the Atlantic and didn't manage to cut supply lines from the USA to Europe through GIUK gap.

they were stabbed in the back by other indos, though
then again, Aztecs were colossal cunts who did in fact sacrifice people, even starting wars for that sole purpose, so I can't blame them

You're grasping at straws, you're categorically in the wrong if you think that the blunders of your leaderships can somehow negate the fact that you've had every possible advantage your disposal, from manpower, to land and naval supplies, aerial supremacy and the element of surprise.

And I'm not interested in "podcasts", they're barely one level above "blogs".

That is highly unlikely, since the Soviets at the time were more interested in consolidating power and training a fresh generation of officers, as a result of the failures in Finland (and the purge of 50 000 officers). They simply weren't ready for an offensive war, unlike Germany, who was preparing itself for a conflict for nearly a decade.

Fucking do it mate. The whole of Europe is on it’s way to becoming Rhodesia 2.0 and we’re talking like this isn’t the effective genocide of native Europeans. It’s literally the Helter-Skelter theory.

If you Ivan’s could assure us that you’d remove kebab, repatriate Um Bongo, slaughter the traitors and help us rebuild a European society, you’d have half of Europe pledging fealty to your cause.

They were at the verge of doing so, twice, when they were gunning for the Ottomans, then you and France happened, twice.

>every possible advantage your disposal,
wrong
>from manpower,
only in the opening months of Barbarossa
>to land and naval supplies,
the opposite is true due to Lend-Lease
>aerial supremacy
wrong, the German air force was destroyed by the US and UK (who didn't matter according to you)
>and the element of surprise.
only relevant for summer 1941, Stalin knew war was coming
what you're leaving out is the crucial lack of oil, coal, food, ore, and pretty much every resource imaginable that Germany was starved off thanks to its geographic location, whereas the Allies had plenty resources thanks the huge territories of the USSR, USA, and British empire.

By the way, if we talk about Russia steamrolling Europe, it was actually a highly probable scenario yet few decades ago. Western Europe had no freaking idea, and probably still doesn't how close to death it was in the first half of 80s. Russians built here dozens of secret installations in which they were storing thousands of tactical nuclear warheads from yield of 40 to 300kt that were designed to be used against European cities in first stage of the invasion. Poland alone had bigger military exercises back then - organized practically non-stop - than today's Russian Federation as a whole. Polish army's main task in the day of WW3 was to go through Northern Europe to take over Danish Straits which would enable soviet navy to do what Third Reich didn't manage to do during the Battle of the Atlantic. Polish soldiers were not supplied with Geiger counter for a reason: because soviet leadership was afraid that they could escape from the battleground if they found out that they received deadly dose of radiation.

On this video you can see few of tens of such nuclear doom-centers built by Russians on the territory of Western Poland. Best part of the video begins in 6:57 when the guy goes through doors leading to the command center of the nuclear installation.

youtu.be/JTciZbouPug?t=417

Pic-related: a secret soviet plan of invading Western Europe stolen by a Polish soviet officer and sold to Pentagon in the 80s in exchange for American visa and life in luxury under new fake identity afterwards (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryszard_Kukliński)

Attached: nlTCy6Q.jpg (2499x1814, 963K)

>By the way, if we talk about Russia steamrolling Europe, it was actually a highly probable scenario yet few decades ago.

But Russia had 3x bigger population back then, second biggest industrial output in the world and very good demography. So it was a complete antithesis of today's Russia, which is a dwarf in all these spheres.

How many Russian women were craving for black cock during the last WC?

>tf
>tp

Attached: 1538409354254.jpg (1000x941, 218K)

Again, subhuman, no amount of revisionism will mitigate the fact that the Russians have pushed your shit in, all by themselves, and that they were in fact those who've fought alone, during most of the war, not you :)).

>wrong
denial instead of arguments, just like Grosspapa moments before his death :)).

>only in the opening months of Barbarossa
No, till late 1942.

>the opposite is true due to Lend-Lease
Again, subhuman, the Lend-Lease was accounted for only 6-12% of all the resources which the Russians have used, and the bulk of it became available ONLY after the lifting of the sea and land blockade around Stalingrad, and as I and history herself recalls, you've already lost by the time that had happened (the lifting of the blockade began during the battle of Kursk, and was entirely lifted a few weeks later).

>who didn't matter according to you
It didn't, since your aerial superiority on the Eastern Front managed to hold till the final phase of Operation Bagration :))

>only relevant for summer 1941, Stalin knew war was coming
Knowing that the war will happen, and knowing that you'll be betrayed by the people who've cosigned a Non-Aggression Pact with you are two different things :)), stop grasping at straws, it's getting tedious by now :)).

Modern russia is a bunch of cucks who get humiliated by your own provinc and you want to "steamroll" us? You won't even get past Estonia.

>Russians have pushed your shit in,
yes
>all by themselves
no

>Non-Aggression Pact

Pact Ribbentrop-Molotov can be hardly called "non-aggression pact" because it was an international secret agreement that directly launched WW2 in Europe. This agreement was actually based on common military aggression against Poland as its core. Moreover, Germans and Russians divided spheres of influence in Eurasia between each other in this diplomatic agreement: they treated Europe as a cake to share.

What's with German flags and denial?

Well, realistically, during those incidents Russia was the invader. This time around, we’ve already been invaded and it’s been facilitated by traitorous scum in power. In this instance, Russia would be the liberators. Imagine going down in history as the force that saved Europe from turning into a giant re-enaction of Mad Max filled with Jawas and Redguards? Fuck, the bards would be singing the praise for generations...

modern Russia isn't the USSR anymore. Their economy isn't powerful enough to supply a huge "steamroller" army like back in the day. Except for the case of nuclear war (in which all sides would be fucked), they can't defeat NATO, probably not even the EU.

Indeed. I can imagine Russia destabilizing Eastern Europe, but i can't imagine Russia attacking Western Europe. It is science fiction scenario, imo.

Keep telling yourself that lol. In reality they'd be able to take over most of Europe fairly quickly but would get pushed back by the US if they intervened.

I, for one, cannot wait to see Europe under the Russian boot.

Like you steamroll all the time :)? Right?

What denial? You really think the barely functioning Russia could sustain a prolonged military campaign of any level when it can't even control its own territory?
You people need to wake up from the ridiculous american propaganda and look at the facts.
Modern Russia isn't even a shadow of the Soviet Union.

>You really think the barely functioning Russia could sustain a prolonged military campaign of any level
>What is Syria
Imagine being this delusional.

>fighting rag-tag rebels with AKs is the same as fighting first world militaries

>What is Syria
Not a prolonged military campaign of the russian goverment?
Russia is asissting the syrian military to fight the same enemy half a dozen other actors are fighting.
In Ukraine russia is supplying seperatists and regional militia, thats all they can do.

>first world militaries
with zero actual experience lol
>bbbbbut we had guys milling around on bases in Afghanistan with the Americans!!
lmao

>fighting rag-tag rebels funded by the CIA and Israel thousands of miles away from their border
*ftfy
I think Syria has demonstrated incredibly well that Russians can not only fight despite poor economic conditions (although that's always been the case) but can project power globally and in opposition to other global and major regional powers.
also thisRussians have much more fighting experience than European militaries

>americans think they have experience
Pathetic, thats why you are forced to beg the Taliban for negotiations now.

We weren't worried about the Soviets during the Cold War, we're definitely not worried now, and neither should Europe be.
Nukes would be their only chance to cause any damage.

Attached: eaglehorse009.jpg (800x568, 97K)

Not to mention an arsenal and standing army that dwarfs any Euro military tbqh
>We weren't worried about the Soviets during the Cold War
LMAO

In other words, they're "invaders" only when they're at the verge of wiping out your old oriental ally :))? Where was this European solidarity when we Serbs were rebelling against the Ottomans, and most importantly, where was European solidarity of yours when you've made sure the Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo would get their "zones" in the very bosom of Yugoslavia?

As I recall, you were the greatest enablers of Muslims in Europe, and still are, even today, coupled with your bastard from "across the pond".

True, but again, it was still a Non-Aggression Pact, but strictly between these two sovereign geopolitical entities.

Cope more, won't change a thing :)).

>can not only fight despite poor economic conditions (although that's always been the case) but can project power globally
It shows neither, of course they can supply a country even poorer than them. Russia is still one of the largest economies in total. Its not projecting anymore power in Syria than european countries do in Mali or the Strait of Aden.
The actual fighting is 99% Syrian Army and militias, russia supplies material and special services, not actual fighting power.
You don't know shit about the shape of the war in Syria.

Also it looks like fort Trump will be a thing, I'll be going to Poland this summer.
I was on the border during the Cold War, little guy.

Attached: apr0203_TS2.jpg (700x494, 67K)

Euro militaries do have experience thanks to NATO, and the bongs and French have their own combat experience as well
anyways, proper equipment and organization > experience
a modern military that hasn't seen combat will still curbstomp some jihadists who have been fighting for decades, be it by firepower alone.
Americans have the best military on earth, if you deny this you're delusional. They only "lost" in Vietnam/Afghanistan because it's too costly, if the political will was there they could curbstomp any opponent.

>Not to mention an arsenal and standing army that dwarfs any Euro military tbqh
Outdated material from 40 years ago being used by poorly trained and funded soldiers with questionable loyalties to the central goverment. I'm shaking.

Russian forces in Syria are tiny. Even Poland alone could send such forces technically. Russians were just blind-bombing everything there, with using storages of soviet-era bombs. They also used Syria as a test-ground for their relatively new developments in area of military industry. For example drones and cruise missiles. Syria was also a good exercise of moving forces on long distances and building infrastructure which is needed for this. But military aspect of this operation wasn't calculated for being a preparation to huge mass-scale war in Europe. I think that Russia decided to enter Syria to threaten Israel which would enable Russian leadership to force the USA to go away from Eastern Europe. Russians know perfectly that Americans are fanatical about safety of Israel so it is a good way to go from their perspective. Now their diplomatic weight grew considerably, and they are main member of "allied triangle" between Israel, USA and Russia.

Finland could go to war with Russia and NATO and still emerge victorious

Attached: 5519477_.jpg (1140x760, 103K)

Based Russian

>Americans have the best military on earth, if you deny this you're delusional.
They have the largest, they certainly don't have the best.

>They only "lost" in Vietnam/Afghanistan because it's too costly
Lol running out of material and will to fight is how you usually lose wars of agression.
Not everything is total war, you still lost.

He is right you know

I don't care. My mom is Russian with some Croatian, dad is Norwegian/Finnish with some Russian and Rumanian blood.
I'm a broken as fuck mutt. Just invade and kill us please. Or give me vodka and kotlet