Holy shit, they got 6 tasks done today

..and none are scheduled past Sept 2nd. They keep purposefully moving them up...
...I wonder why?

Attached: pivotaltrackerchainlink.png (1919x961, 167K)

fake and gay just sold 100k

>none are scheduled past Sept 2nd. T
>.I wonder why?
Year long hiatus, minimum

explain this in brainlet terms

We are going to be rich

yes but they don't even have a network, consensus, aggregation, reputation, reputation providers, link staking, reporting, audits done yet. If you think link has even a 1% chance of reaching main net in 2019 you deluded as fuck.

With that being said I expect new partners and a lot more testing throughout this year which may drive the price

lmao naw main net live this year !

Attached: 1534107368635.jpg (403x195, 22K)

September is going to be a monster month.

thanks user, i saw that too but was too lazy to post it. IIRC there even were tasks past september 2nd, going up until september 9th. if that really is the case, why did they move them?

I'd bet money they're working on that on the side

I don't know friend, but it can only be good. I'm just worried that the 'service agreement' epic has a lot of work left

DELUDED
E
L
U
D
E
D


people ask "when main net" team responds with check pivotal. One look at pivotal and you see team has 8-12 months of work to do.

Fake news
Made me check. kys

You already are

Don't waste your energy brother. 85% of people in this board are depressed retards and when you say realistic stuff like this, they get nervous and direct their unresolved anger issues at you.

aggregation was change to "service level agreements"

32 millions
One year
Made fuck all
Lmao

They don't "move them". Every project has a director (CTO) that manages the project's tasks and deadlines.

In this case Steve Ellis adds or edits the tasks as they finish the previous ones needed. Kinda like stacking legos to build a tower. Not having tasks past x date doesn't mean they won't add more.

Also, the most important part of the project (consensus), hasn't been started yet, they are still building the framework for the jobs specs (name id's, amount of link needed, etc.).

All in all, I think mainnet would be ready at the soonest in march 2019.

Everyone is thinking that it will launch in September, but thats so fucking optimistic. unless the team have outsourced a shit load of work in secret. the reputation system literally is what makes link the 1000$ meme. i f they are just starting it then then it confirms we have a while to go, and we know they wont launch a half baked product because they have no reason to. Next year, or if they really get their act together November-December is feasible.

Also, when you look on the github and see their commits its impressive, but looking at exactly what hthey are trying to do with the reputation system and its a bit obvious that there is a lot fo work to be done, and anyone with ANY knowledge of C+and Linux custom script integrated GNU compilers knows it's a minimum 2-3 year AT BEST with a single coder, maybe less with more.

Link devs took the hard route of going for a SE Linux hardened kernel integration into their scripting tool - PRO TIP, since they are using it as part of the foundation for main-net, it is essential it is 100% complete, and with investors like Swift its not going to be fucking risked launching early.

Even Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux) took 2 years to compile a similar scripting tool.

>inb4 all this brainlet fud hurrr durrr link $2320 eoy!!!

don't forget the codeship integration, 2035 at the very least

I don't care how long it takes. I just hope in that time the PnD fags will have jumped ship.
These idiots don't see the long term potential that chainlink brings and I hope none of them get rich

They always do that shit. Every week they finish the next two weeks tasks.

And unless I'm totally mistaken, the little blue tics in the right side of the task indicate progress. I haven't looked yet, but I'd bet you 100 Linkies that the ones scheduled until Sept 2nd are mostly done.

They live ahead of schedule

the epics look eerily close to completion
mvp?

brainlet. SLA's are initiated by the requester and dictates the terms of the smart contract. has absolutely nothing to do with aggregation. you could figure this out by literally just reading the term.

the team has stated they plan to create a basic reputation system to launch but will be using third party reputation integration later on. reputation won't demand a large chunk of time.

>third party reputation integration
>Decentralized oracle

user... I...

they barely added that one

the team literally said this in either the slack or telegram.

I know, that's worse.

penis

Gegegeg benis

ebin :DDD

>he doesn't know about the shadow fork