Who was the hitler of the middle ages?

i dont know, there were probably hundreds. hitler lasted 8 years. how many centuries are in the middle ages? like 4? 5?

this

ah yes, that's why after hundreds of years of "slavery" balkans are still christian. i think you're mistaking us with yourself. we were too merciful for the conquered, that was our biggest mistake.

Fuck you

Do you believe in the fantasy holohoax?
Without holohoax hitler only responsible for a few dozen dozen thousand civilian deaths

Unlike the tolerant Christians who also killed anyone who didn't want to convert to Christianity.

Compare how Christians were treated under Al Andalus with how you treated Muslims and Jews after the reconquista

...

So why is all of the middle east muslim now? Used to be christian
Ottomans are different from arabs you moron

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1066_Granada_massacre

That came from experience with muslims

Read about the Almohad caliphate and the "forced conversion"

There are still many christians in the middle east, most of which fled to Latin America during last century because of civil unrest.
Nothing to do with the middle ages
Ottomans were muslims as well

>how Christians were treated in al andalus
>no property
>no land
>no rights
>in chains
>slaves
>must recogbize superiority of muslims
>have their land stolen
I would get a hard on if war with moorniggerocco happens and glasses you all.

>This complete nonsense with no historical basis is true
>the magically poofing 6 million! The largest deaths in history completely subject to imagination

Much better: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudéjar

Still, the abbais caliphate killed people who did not want to convert hence north africa and the middle east is not christian anymore
and the Cordoba emirate also did the same get killed or convert, thats why there was a mass exodus into north Spain and that is how they re-conquered the Iberian peninsula
you can look it up

>However, over the next several decades this religious freedom deteriorated. Islam was outlawed in Portugal by 1497,[8]the Crown of Castile by 1502,[9]and the Crown of Aragon by 1526,[10]forcing the Mudéjars to convert or in some cases leave the country.[11]Following the forced conversion, they then faced suspicions that they were not truly converted but remained crypto-Muslims, and were known asMoriscos. The Moriscos, too, wereeventually expelled, in 1609–1614.

The muslims engaged in aggressive wars of expansion and it was indoctrinated as something good in the quran so an illegal religion was made illegal.

>have a muslim stronghold on the iberian side of the straits of gibraltar
yeah bro, sounds very feasible

Attached: 1562154466492.png (645x773, 20K)

neck yourself mutt, everyone was engaging in wars of expansion back then, it's about how you treated those you conquered.
And you're by far the last ones to take as an example of how to treat the locals.

medieval time ends in the 15th century
babary slave trade started around 16th century afaik

>this shit flinging between two religious groups as if this was facebook
You retards do realize that most killings by both sides were done for political, military and demographic purposes right? It's not because the team you support is holier than the other one that your side was more persecuted, whichever side you deem it to be. Conquest and genocide were the norms of middle ages both in Europe and in the Arab world, trying to whitewash the history of the either side is dishonest and retarded. None of you have innocent ancestors.

Much better than the almohads:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almohad_reforms

"Jews and Christians were denied freedom of religion, with conversion or death being the rule."

What do you think the crusades were? You think they were in Jerusalem just to hang out?

And good meme greentext, a shame none of it is true.
Christians were allowed to own property and land under literally every caliphate

you are the ones saying the "tolerant" meme though

This, nothing is pure

Christianity has no.doctrine glorifying aggressive wars of expansion islam mandates it, so an illegal religion was made illegal, what kingdoms and their government politics do has nothing to do with the legality of a religion.

Why is an african nigger calling me a mutt?

still most of Islam was spread with the sword unlike Christianity

yes they were allowed under draconian systems of taxation and justice, essentially being a second rate human that cannot accomplish anything in a court and virtually always has to live in poverty so tolerant!

gustav adolf

Notging to do with the christian religion just a governments policy in reaction to muslim wanton aggressive expansion

fuck yourself you dog

There are literally millioms of christians in the middle east but there are no real pagans left in europe.

>crusades
>Notging to do with the christian religion
>still most of Islam was spread with the sword unlike Christianity

Attached: sure.jpg (600x647, 47K)

Christians didnt want pagan slaves and spread differently than islam.

>there are some left
ok and what happened to rest?
they just vanished into thin air right?
>muslims attack christian land
yeah kill em
>christians fight back
they are soooo evil how can they?

most of christianity, in europe wasnt spread by the sword

Yes all those peaceful Christians conversions in sub saharan Africa and the Americas.
Hell even your own country was converted by Romans "peacefully".

everyone in this thread is a poopyhead

colonization has nothing to do with religion
And even your land was converted "peacefully" by Arab invaders it used to be christian

It used to be part of the roman empire, but not christian in any meaningful percentage.
>colonization has nothing to do with religion
Yet in many instances the latter was used to justify the former

bro, from the start of the Quran that nigga muhammed starts conquering all shit around him, by the sword, and then his generals do, and like that all of mena eventually ends up Muslim/ arab, regions like egypt and the magreb completely lose their own native culture in the process. In europe it all started very underground and very suppressed but eventually people started openly professing their faith, which they had learned of through the stories of the disciples of christ, this is what happened in most of Europe

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_Morocco
Please learn your countrys history

Muslims expansion stopped when they reached the vast stretches of land that they could not pass through

Morocco-Pakistan/India

Nah that's wrong, Christianity spread by bribery threats economic warfare embargos and military force.

He did nothing wrong.

Charles V
In general the Spaniards were the baddies of medieval Europe

Attached: Elderly_Karl_V.jpg (1154x1402, 345K)

no it didn't nigger, even the great frankish king Clovis willfully converted to christianity, which is what started the process in northern, western and central europe

Go clean some toilets you dumb polack dog

Clovis converted to the religion of his vassals and that sorrounded him, Saxons were converted by conquest, Byzantine was converted by military force of constantine that did mass genocides of pagan greeks and replaced with christian arabs

Based and true.

Attached: alla057.jpg (1500x932, 425K)

no retard, his "vassals" if anything were part of Arian christianity a branch his converted to faith deemed a heresy. He converted because of his wife. And he jeopardised himself because of it.

And cite your sources for what Constantine allegedly did, before Constantine was even around there had already been mass christianisation unsuccesfully suppressed by the Romans for centuries. By the time he came around, it already was a majority, at least to Roman hellenism.

This but realizing being civilized is a bad thing

>None of you have innocent ancestors.
Not everyone is a nomadic parasite Mehmet, my ancestors were all peasants from Auvergne, maybe some of them killed Romans but that's it.

moron
muslims were tolerant towards christians as long as they were paying Jizya
Muslims, Christians and Jews were living together in relative peace in Iberia and Levant until christians launched the crusades

sure

Americans were tolerant to black slaves

>During its golden age, Spain was open to a good deal of religious tolerance. For the most part the Almoravids let other People of the Book, or other religions that held the Old Testament as a holy text, practice their religion freely.[3] The Almoravids, however, were more puritanical than previous Muslim rulers of Spain.[citation needed]

>The golden age for Jews in Spain is considered to be under the relative lax rule of the Muslim Caliphates in al-Andalus. It was generally a time when Jews were free to conduct business, participate in government, and practice their religion without fear of persecution.

>According to historian Bernard Lewis, the massacre is "usually ascribed to a reaction among the Muslim population against a powerful and ostentatious Jewish vizier."[
I literally copypasted this from the link you posted. During the 8th-10th century the arab world was considerably more civilised than the local Iberians and Visigoths, and than the Spaniards after them (Spanish inquisition, anyone?) . Learn some of your own history before you spew bullshit, you uneducated retard.

But he's from the Renaissance, not the Middle Ages.

During the 8th-10th century the arab world was considerably more civilised than the local Iberians and Visigoths, and than the Spaniards
Fuck off shitskin

In terms of casualties, probably some chink warlord.

The spanish inquisition is a massive meme, that in actuality barely did anything. The european ""dark ages"" is an obsolete concept very little actual historians take seriously

How do you measure civilization? Tolerance you say? Here is a little challenge for you, look up how many wars of conquests have been fought in the name of Islam, versus the amount of ones in the name of christendom, the crusades are barely anything, if anything one of the small examples of christian "agression" in an ocean of Islamic aggression. One could argue that real tolerance under that pretext isn't conquering someone at all and subjecting them to your """"tolerant""' rights

Jerusalem under European-""christian"""

So ?

Do it again.

ok
So ?

i'm pretty sure in terms of casualties it was Genghis Khan or one of the next great khans
mongols literally decimated the world

>they were living in peace in occupied land so don't reconquer it you evil people

Attached: 1555673819678.jpg (471x400, 119K)

they just took Iberia by force from visigoths, just like visigoths took it by force from Rome

Rome didn't need the land. The Visigoths were just wanting to settle somewhere. But of course not even one hundred and fifty into existence and Muslims are already conquering land and still playing victim... now I see why you're defending them. You have something in common with them.

Attached: 20190402_212338863.jpg (200x309, 11K)

why do you care since when dutch faggots even fought muslims lmao

bullshit most of the Soviet casualities were civilians and they alone numbered in millions