Why are Finns so intelligent?

Why are Finns so intelligent?

Attached: yuropeiq.jpg (1300x1186, 452K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=E25xEf30bis
youtube.com/watch?v=bwDrHqNZ9lo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because this map was made by a Finn

these maps are made by a fingolian nationalist and anglo white supremacist

No they weren't. Stop lying

This. Finns can't even speak English properly.

Even the US states with the highest concentrations of Finnish ancestry have the highest IQ's

Attached: map.jpg (1280x720, 132K)

youtube.com/watch?v=E25xEf30bis

Interesting so far. Thanks

iq is more autism than intelligence desu

IQ has nothing to do with intelligence.

It's the best measure of it

Superior people have superior intellect

cope

>wtf how can non-indoniggers have accents???
retard

Attached: 1505529113055.jpg (800x534, 87K)

>anglo
>white
Why are they doing this?

bump

at least post a real IQ map (the only done on europeans with the same method), not a meme done by lynn where he massaged data and made non-sense combos without any explanation.

Attached: Buj_IQ_d002-7Europesra022sjdjjdnan-bc3s3370.png (4592x3196, 1.21M)

Because we do the same shit as chinks and only test high IQ people like university students so that the results are skewed.

>we

Fuck off, butthurt foreigner.

Attached: 3b35065e.jpg (500x428, 45K)

bump

those maps are based mostly on TIMSS/PIRLS and PISA samples which are not even representative for the whole country population, and they are not IQ tests

but yes, Finns are high IQ

Attached: finland-pisa1.png (809x403, 10K)

Because of this kind of a paternal ancestry.

Attached: Nganasans-1-700x700.jpg (700x700, 158K)

>Balkan niggers
>poles
Just no

/mitteleuropa-gang/
youtube.com/watch?v=bwDrHqNZ9lo

130 iq reporting in.

What are you cranial parameters?

Attached: cranialcapacity.png (529x294, 48K)

Compare with immigration...

Attached: large_P1rhBZ7F6oHwXAP8ba3vIX0wh29dDJZKYU-B3vruoJE.jpg (850x850, 271K)

Attached: iceage.png (641x897, 85K)

Not the ice age. Rather the change of seasons and having to adapt to such extreme changes all of the time.

The beginning of ice age required such adaption

Slightly bigger head than average for a guy my height (187cm), havent measured it but based on visual appearance. Also have the so called math bump.

My brother

Attached: 77F4C80E-3028-432E-9E93-560810813909.png (659x525, 205K)

>Also have the so called math bump

If you believe in pseudo-science then I doubt you have 130 iq

you know all of this "winter hypothesis" is mega bullshit right?

I'm 189cm and I just measured my head circumference and got 58cm. Meme internet test by Mensa gave me 138 IQ

Attached: mensa members per capita.png (206x547, 14K)

Where exactly did I imply a belief in anything? He asked a question, I answered to the best of my knowledge. Afaik cranial measurements are pretty unscientific anyway since iirc the only somewhat proven connection there is; more grey matter/synapses is typically linked with higher brain capacity. Plus plenty of really intelligent people have believed in all kinds of nonsense, so even that is no proof in itself.

that's why you have to use emoticons :-)

People call IQ a pseudo science all the time, even in modern universities. (presumably because it only makes Western and Asian countries look smart and Africans really dumb)

What is the math bump though? Is it located on the lower back of your head? I have that and I hate math. My dad said it's a "German bump" which sounds dumb af especially since we have no German ancestry

It makes sense to me. People who have to endure highly variable seasons must gather food for the winter and that requires planning ahead which requires intelligence. And not only food, clothes and shelter need to be spot on as well. Tropical areas are favorable for r-selective types of humans since they have food available year-round, so having lots of babies and investing less to offspring is the way to go. That doesn't apply to K-selective types of humans because they have to teach their offspring about the environment and therefore invest more.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

Can you explain? Because from a glance it sounds like you're just a brown person coping :/

but the highest concentration is in michigan

Other than this I add
>adjusted
Any study that has "adjusted" is shit

let me ask you ONE question, why would winters particularly would lead to selective preassures for IQ (or whatever)?

The Finn literally explained it
Having to live your life adjusting for harsh, deadly winters forces you to develop skills and planning you wouldn't need other places

why are shithuanians so retarded?

I just explained it

>must plan ahead because of highly variable seasons
>must invest more to offspring

Still way higher than all of Latin America, Africa and the Middle East

>R/K_selection_theory
yeah that's even more bullshit (FAKE bullshit in this casse) from the charlatan Rushton

see www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dL8XCuBNM4

(ironically that's from the same researcher cited here, Dutton is a good fellow he just have so many hot takes, some of them are good, some of them are bad and some are very bad)

Then how else do you explain the European's higher IQ? Or is that pseudo science too?

but why winters SPECIFICALLY? why wouldn't that logic apply to a fucking desert or the top of a mountain or a jungle where there's a lot of nature that wants to kill you (not only animals)

there isn't ANY evidence that cold climates or cold winters or extreme seasonal patters cause you to plan better or invest more in your children or wife or have a higher IQ, it's just correlations

The selection theory is not by Rushton but he used it to explain racial differences. Humans in general are pretty K-selective but some are more and some are less.

Can you summarize the video?

lower than sl*vs though

autism

Because harsh winters are 100% unlivable. Nothing is deadlier or harder to live in than below freezing weather (that lasts for MONTHS)
Not even the desert

Because long winters require highly advanced clothes, shelter and means for making as much food as possible.

Of course it's not the only reason, I think Black Death caused a rise in average IQ in Europe because only the ones who were well-off survived, which is reasonable because Dark Ages were pretty dull times while renaissance sprout right after the Black Death.

>Can you summarize the video?
>Rushton attempted to manipulate people into supporting his model and cherry picked and dishonestly presented his findings

Then there has to be someone who can prove him wrong with non-cherrypicked data, right?

I see everyone saying that he's dishonest but I don't see any evidence against his claims.

>Because harsh winters are 100% unlivable
[citation needed],I don't even think they are the harshest climates for humans to live
>I think Black Death caused a rise in average IQ in Europe
that would make sense if lower IQ would be at least correlated to weak inmune system, which is not true

>that would make sense if lower IQ would be at least correlated to weak inmune system, which is not true

No, it makes sense because people who have high social standing are usually smarter and those were the kind of people to survive Black Death.

>I don't see any evidence against his claims.
well it seems you have missed the last THIRDY of research on human biodiversity (which by the way Rushton et al. just ignore it)

slav monkey cope

detroit is holding them down.

What is it about human biodiversity that speaks against him?

Attached: racemyths.jpg (2970x2483, 2.12M)

>and those were the kind of people to survive Black Death
except that 's not true, the black death like many other diseases tended to kill the very old, newborns, undernourished, etc., what the plague did was to modify human demography after it killed so many people, the specific selection that the black death had was to select people with better inmune genes

I'm taking about Rushton and people with similar views to him specifically, not all of the race or intelligence research (I'm not a blank slatist nor sjw nor anything like that)

>that's just not true!
Just because you don't think it's the harshest climate doesn't mean shit. It is literally impossible to live in unless you have adequate shelter and planning. In places like Northern Europe, you could die just by standing outside for a few hours if you're unclothed, even faster if moisture is involved. The cold can also make you sick. There's no other climate that deadly on earth. You wont die from standing outside in Africa, even at it's hottest, if you have some nice cold water to sip on. It will suck, but you wont die.
Being from Mexico, you literally have no clue. I didn't either, being from Texas, I always admired the cold until I went to NYC for Christmas and it was 17 degrees fahrenheit, it was fucking unbearable even with tons of warm clothing. Now imaging sub-zero temperatures? You can die

Also, consider everything being frozen over. Consider being snowed in, for days on end, unable to leave your shelter. This is not uncommon at all in the Northern US. Tbh it amazes me how they even manage to do it

It's pretty much the only measure of it. And it's shit measuring intellingence. It measures inductive and deductive reasoning only so it's just a very, very small bit of certain kind of intelligence, nothing more. Abductive reasoning is probably what people need the most. And coming up with whole new ideas, answers etc., now that needs actual intelligence.

>And coming up with whole new ideas, answers etc
Things pretty much exclusive to the West and Asia, as far as inventions and innovation goes

you were the ones making assertions so the burden of proof rest on you, again I don't even think very cold climates are that harsh compared to other ecosystem where humans live, for example you can also die by just standing outside for a few hours in the Sahel or the Namib desert or the Australian outback and yet the Nilotics the San nor the Khoikhoi nor the Aboriginies have an intelligence above average (or at least higher than the neighbouring population), Tibetans live in a harsher and colder climate than the Chinese and yet they are worse off
>There's no other climate that deadly on earth
again I haven't read actual ecological or demographic research claiming stuff like this, it's just psychologist making that assumption and never backing it up, from what I've read areas with low vegetation are the ones that are harder for humans (which would be pretty much deserts and the poles)

people like aboriginals are very well adapted to their own environment. they are amazing trackers for example, it's the modern society where they don't succeed. they are very good at what they were doing 70,000 years.

This

and I forgot to mention that there is actually research that shows that hot climates are worse for survival than cold climates, for example hot climates have more predators and more patogens, and there's also a small "heat effect" on interpersonal violence

>more patogens
which following this logic would make Indonesians and Congolese the smartest people in the planet

>you can also die by just standing outside for a few hours in the Sahel or the Namib desert or the Australian outback
No you wont as long as you keep hydrated, not in just a few hours. People die in these climates from exhaustion and dehydration, attempting to travel in it with no supplies. With cooling systems, an ice chest of water, and an umbrella, you could remain in this environment for a long time. This isn't the case in sub-zero temperatures.
Also Tibetan IQ is still 92, higher than much of the world. Almost all of Africa, India etc in the grand scheme of things, they're pretty up there IQ-wise
I don't think anyone is saying that climate and the black plague are 100% the reasons for European intelligence, we're just saying that they're large factors along with other factors that contribute

fuck yo Netherlands!

why would cold winters make you good at calculus?

Okay now you're kind of strawmanning
Cold winters would improve your problem solving skills in general, whether it's calculus or whatever

Also, it almost doesn't matter which climate is actually more deadly or not, the factor that matters most is the tons of planning ahead for these winters where life becomes frozen for a period of time

>your problem
which one... we have so many... but those problems weren't created by us. But by you

here is some evidence showing that "hot" climates are actually harsher than "cold" ones

>In regions closer to the equator, people face different and often more immediate challenges. As noted earlier, in warmer climates, it is not only the heat itself that challenges survival, but also pathogens and predators (e.g., Epstein 1999; Fincher & Thornhill 2012; Schaller 2006; Thornhill & Fincher 2011). Pathogen stress is strongly related to distance from the equator because temperature is an important determinant of disease transmission. Closer to the equator, where there is less seasonal variability, there is no cold winter to kill the many viruses and bacteria native to these areas (Schaller &
Murray 2008).
>Cold winters kill not only viruses and bacteria, but also the hosts that transmit them, such as mosquitoes that transmit malaria to humans (Blanford et al. 2013). Infectious diseases, which proliferate in hotter climates, are an important cue of environmental harshness and unpredictability because they have caused more deaths in traditional equatorial cultures than predators, natural disasters, and war combined (e.g., Gurven & Kaplan 2007; Inhorn & Brown1990).
>Predation risk is another cue to environmental harshness and unpredictability prevalent in hot climates with less seasonal variation in temperature. In these warmer locations live more dangerous animals, especially venomous animals

I'm not talking about YOUR problems specifically, my friend who dindu nuffin

Refer toIt doesn't really matter which one is the most harsh. What matters is other factors surrounding the different lifestyles that different climates force you to create

>who dindu nuffin
but we haven't... that's why your """cartels""" kidnap people in Mexico in order to work for you. Like your jew owners, they want cheap labor.

exactly, that sounds like a stretch don't you think, a lot of other factors have to be considered

the point I want to make is that this winter stuff it is bullshit and doesn't even predict shit

i read that venom and hot climates is a geological coincidence and not actually interrelated

Honestly I give up. This is pointless, it's just a fucking theory, and I'm probably not gonna change your mind so, you win.

anyone here with a high IQ knows that IQ isn't a valuable measuremen of anything on its own

Cartels weren't even an issue until we loosened up our immigration laws in 1965
Keep blaming da whyte man tho, you'll go far

>IQ
it was invented by jews to see how much you are adjusted for being a slave... I thought Netherlandese were smart

*pats you on the head*

>Keep blaming da whyte man tho
but you did invent cartels. Isn't the CIA and DEA part of the fast and furious shit?... the white man doens'nt have any soul, just like chinks

>What matters is other factors surrounding the different lifestyles that different climates force you to create
then why force this stupid winter meme, don't you see it's super retarded, I keep disputing it because a month ago another psychology paper came out with this stupid """theory""" and the evidence presented didn't even support the claims made and when the authors where challenged in social media they just appealed to "common sense" and continued making ad hoc explanations (like you and the Finn here)

Attached: D8K07CbXYAANLVq.png (860x731, 207K)

imbecile

>mfw being European and being this stupid

Attached: 156237516768.jpg (628x581, 46K)

If not having a soul means being way more prosperous with a higher standard of living and technology (like whites and chinks), then I'm fine with that

>If not having a soul means being way more prosperous
>thinks htat paying for basic human rights is being more advanced culturally

Attached: 1562335202511.jpg (760x548, 92K)

Literally tons of 3rd world shitholes have "free" healthcare, that doesn't make your country good or culturally superior lol but ok

>with a higher standard of living
I'm not him but higher IQ doesn't necessarly mean better living standards, for example Hispanics have a higher life expectancy than non-hispanic Whites in America, and Chile has a higher life expectancy than USA

>a country that can make you go chapter 7 for being sick
kek
but we both have free and private healtcare. lol

Attached: 156120572548.png (416x428, 44K)

>marize the video?
>>Rushton attempted to manipulate people into supporting his model and cherry picked and dishonestly
absolutely pathetic