ITT: cursed years in your cunt

for me it's 1809

Attached: wojak shooting self ears.png (700x688, 460K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cartagena_de_Indias
youtube.com/watch?v=zIEUcz7Etng
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Attached: 1473188062308.jpg (1688x2000, 112K)

wrong pic ivan

Attached: grinning wojak ears.png (650x770, 30K)

2001

Attached: serveimage.jpg (2000x1333, 452K)

1914

Attached: 1562189979366.jpg (460x609, 78K)

1965

1237-2019

1898

looks like you missed
here, let me get that for you *slice* *hack*

Attached: enough.png (1716x840, 591K)

t. racis white boy

862

Attached: 1545527914483.jpg (854x1024, 101K)

1888, the year our monarchy fell apart, the year niggas were freed

Attached: 1428735825.jpg (411x430, 83K)

1889 and 1964
fuck the military

1787

Attached: 1525021319456.png (1920x1080, 773K)

1918

>1889
>1964
>military's fault
you need to learn more of our history, nigga

2004

based and red pilled

1965.

1919

1898
Worst yewr of my life

Attached: 02c2e9d6c6b7eaa127cd6df667811ec0.jpg (300x250, 13K)

1809 worst year of my life

Weird how eared wojack is lighter than refular wojack (memory)

1914-present

czecked

Attached: 1454016250198.jpg (1482x1097, 1.15M)

>vai estudar!!!

1. the original version of that particular wojak was some oversized vector shit. see the dimensions. I downscaled it to normal wojak size.
2. the original was jpg, while my version is PNG, which is more size effective for this kind of picture.

Attached: big brain wojak ears.png (645x858, 18K)

*size efficient

Attached: blushing wojak ears.png (645x773, 39K)

6000 BC

butthurt hahah

This.

they were both military coups, dumb macaco

1821 - present

1889
farmers made the coup real, after the feminist freed all the slaves without recompensating any farmer that owned them, implying forced reparations during her monarchy era that never happened
1964
condecoration of Che Guevara with the highest military symbol we had (Jango was vice-president during that) and trying to install communist reforms in the country without caring about the congress' approval or the population's reaction (Jango was president then)

1941

>fault

1970

Attached: quebec-map.gif (662x750, 142K)

all of the 1930s

>farmers got mad because no more slaves meme

they had no participation in the coup, it was just a bunch of assblasted army retards that were mad at the prime minister

44 BC

Attached: Vincenzo_Camuccini_-_La_morte_di_Cesare.jpg (2048x1161, 690K)

1993

>assblasted army retards that were mad at the prime minister
1 - D.Pedro II didn't pay most of the families of military soldiers that died during the Paraguayan War
2 - D.Pedro II banished every military personnel from giving interviews to the press when a General complained to the press about D.Pedro II not paying the families of the soldiers that died during the war

>not paying reparations to families of literal whos that died because they volunteered to rape paraguayan girls

based pedro
besides, the coup wasn't because of that

>got mad because no more slaves meme
>meme
you really think farmers were happy with the abolition?

no, but they didn't take part in the coup

the 1889 coup happened because of a lot of reasons, nigro
but for the most part, the part that made no revolts for the return of the monarchy real, was the sudden freeing of all slaves
just see the amount of revolts between 1889 and 1964 were people wanted the monarchy back, ZERO

yes, they did, they financed it and made sure no one would go against it, just see the amount of revolts that happened during that year, ZERO

name these "communist reforms"

>just see the amount of revolts that happened during that year, ZERO
>he part that made no revolts for the return of the monarchy real
>just see the amount of revolts between 1889 and 1964 were people wanted the monarchy back, ZERO

you're actually retarded
study more, brainlet

João Goulart's "Reformas de Base", especially the agrarian reform (how he meant to do it)
here your own "argument"
tell me, name the revolts

>your own "argument"

is not me

>tell me, name the revolts
Revolta de Ribeirãozinho
Canudos
Revolta da Armada
Ação Imperial Patrianovista Brasileira

1380

Attached: 1A180778-EBD2-45F8-9655-BAA670F4AE3D.jpg (820x885, 163K)

1814: The traitor, Ferdinand VII, comes back from fucking french whores and takes power in Spain after Napoleon is kicked out
1898: The vile americans blow up the Maine to use it as casus belli
1936: The left manipulates the elections in order to win, and assassinates the leader of CEDA (old improtant political party), sending spain into civil war and a dictatorship that lasts 4 decades
2011: The modern traitor, Rajoy, who spent his entire campaign talking about lowering taxes so we can escape the financial crysis: He does the exact opposite of what he promised, dooming us into recession.

We've never had a bad one.

Attached: 1484276938193.png (785x757, 54K)

Attached: EveningStandard1956.jpg (1059x680, 617K)

Never happened, never happened, never happened.

Attached: 1526689919801s.jpg (125x120, 3K)

>Revolta de Ribeirãozinho
wow, a "revolt" with no conflict, so insignificant that didn't last one day and has no count of the amount of individuals that were part of it
>Canudos
they didn't do anything, the army just attacked them suspecting they wanted to restore the monarchy, but it was just a common village that was growing fast, the same as in Guerra do Contestado and Sedição do Juazeiro
>Revolta da Armada
what?
it happened because the naval forces wanted to stop the dictatorship that was being formed by the Army
first one against Deodoro
second against "The Iron Marshall"
>Ação Imperial Patrianovista Brasileira
it was a bunch of pussy larpers that were probably not even 10 individuals, they didn't do anything

1965 -1986
2016

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Attached: why.png (768x649, 245K)

All of them

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cartagena_de_Indias
ever heard of this?

Never once heard of it.

moving goalpost falacy, you asked for revolts and i gave them to you
cope more, military boot licker

i only learnt about it last week
apparently the english king made it illegal to speak about it

That explains it.

3 of those 4 were not examples, the one that "was" had no conflict and didn't even last a day in a very small city with probably not even 5 people participating in it

we were talking about if revolts hapenned or not, not if they were effective, nice try tho
also it's pretty clear you didn't know jack shit about those events and just read a wikipedia article about it

70-1948

explain the "Revolta de Ribeirãozinho" then, the only example of a revolt that tried to restore the monarchy
you seem to know about this insignificant revolt a lot, so tell me about it

i don't owe you an explanation, retard

1861, 1865, 1941, 1963, 2001

Attached: dale.jpg (2000x1321, 390K)

Hopefully the bad times will resume again soon

so you have no argument, my point still stands
there was no real revolt to restore the monarchy, only one small insignificant "revolt" with no conflict that happened in a small city and that didn't last for a single day

Can't think of anything. Maybe when bank secrecy ended. But I don't care about that honestly, since I don't work in a bank

1389.
1389.
1389.

youtube.com/watch?v=zIEUcz7Etng
you will pay for this, country of satan

1847?

1814
1940

1973 - now

because i won't explain you something it means my argument is invalid? that's a quite wild conclusion

>only one small insignificant "revolt" with no conflict that happened in a small city and that didn't last for a single day
you're going to ignore my 3 other examples?
also it being "insignificant" or whatever is irrelevant

you only work with fallacies

based

kek this video again. If only you knew of many children we eat you won't be impressed by this simple satanic dance
I only know there was a civil war. I'm sadly ignorant of our history

>going to ignore my 3 other examples
how funny
here

"lol i think those examples are irrelavant therfore they are"

whatever retard, have sex

i will make it easier for you to read, nigro
1- Canudos
they didn't do anything, the army just attacked them suspecting they wanted to restore the monarchy, but it was just a common village that was growing fast, the same as in Guerra do Contestado and Sedição do Juazeiro

2- Revolta da Armada
what?
it happened because the naval forces wanted to stop the dictatorship that was being formed by the Army
first one against Deodoro
second against "The Iron Marshall"

3- Ação Imperial Patrianovista Brasileira
it was a bunch of pussy larpers that were probably not even 10 individuals, they didn't do anything

1970

2007-2009

1930
1945
1976
1982
2001
Everything would be so much better if only...

you should put ear parts flying

1997, the year I was born

1821
1903

1836 Texan Independence
1848 Got BTFO by gringos
1858 Juárez 1st Presidential Period
1867 End of the 2nd Mexican Empire
1910 Mexican Revolution
1923 Treat of Bucarelli
1929 Guerra Cristera
1984 Implementation of neoliberalism
1993-4 Economic Depression
2006 War on Drugs (40k death, hundreds of lost, thousands migrated)

I just want it to stop. We weren't meant to be.

>end of second Mexican empire
>bad
Found the proxy

Emperor Maximilian himself proclaimed a lot of laws favoring the common folk like:
>Restricting working hours and abolishing child labour
>Cancelled all debts for peasants over 10 pesos
>Restored communal property and forbade all forms of corporal punishment
>Forbiding hacienda stores so peons could no longer be bought and sold for the price of their debt
Plus he offered Juarez the title of Prime Minister, which he refused because he was scheming a chimpout with gringo military aid.

QUIT POSTING THESE WOJAKS WITH THE EARS YOU SWEDISH FUCK

this place's been cursed since forever and there's no help in sight

Attached: 1545347443595.png (1000x1000, 119K)

1968 for sure

1930-today