Link and Hyperledger

Sorry to disappoint Link anons but Hyperledger is not using or working with Chainlink as an oracle solution.

I work for IBM and am a Link Marine and have been digging into our Hyperledger docs to find a connections and it's not there.

Hyperledger is doing some unbelievable shit and tackling all problems that most shitcoins are trying to tackle and they're all going to get BTFO by IBM's gigantic crypto dick:

>muh shipping tracking:
Google "TradeLens" - Just signed a huge deal with MERCK aka the biggest shipper in the world

>muh identity
Trusted Identity - See Sovrin connection

>muh counterfeit food tracking
IBM Food Trust - BTFO VeChain and Wabi

>muh banking revolution aka Ripple / XRP
IBM World Wire using Stellar

You clowns really think these billion dollar corporations are going to let these loser startups beat them to the market and win in the long run with the resources and money they have?

Stop being so naive...


Oh yea, and looking at our internal documents, the IBM team looked into using / building on top of the Ethereum blockchain but it was so terrible they decided to build their own blockchain - enter Hyperledger

Attached: d5eb29f9e49c6ec6c03eafaf6f5f15c0da3f5adf_1_472x500.jpg (472x500, 114K)

Other urls found in this thread:

medium.com/@accordhq/smart-legal-contracts-and-oracles-36d4eb538a92
capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/07/smart-contracts.pdf
lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric
lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric/search?p=Created,,oracles,20,2,0,0
lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric/topic/17549742#2510
disclosurequest.com/form/chainlink-crypto-fund-lp/0001728696-18-000001/?returnURL=
hyperledger.org/blog/2017/06/08/hyperledger-announces-performance-and-scalability-working-group
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Proof you work at IBM or no care.

Suck my dick and balls

Attached: Capture.png (1659x906, 605K)

bump

Fud. Nice try I am not selling.

So how are IBM and Hyperledger getting off-chain data onto the Blockchain?

I believe him because several months ago an user was posting about how he worked at IBM and they were basically going to steal VeChain's usecase with a new platform they were launching.

That was before any word of tradelens had been heard. I think this is the same user

thanks for being worried about us but I'm not selling and I guess most other link marines aren't selling either. It would take Sergey's order for me to sell, even then I would probably hesitate

Why is the Hyperledger logo on the Chainlink website?

Attached: 08-10-18 at 02.38 AM.jpg (1017x442, 111K)

IMB has 366,000 global employees.
Anything you know is already priced in.
>steal VeChain's usecase
Jesus christ someone give me patience with these brainlets

This

Attached: 2017 december email showing ibm researching chainlink.jpg (1532x3140, 994K)

Attached: bart cant.jpg (1208x4085, 1.27M)

yeah this.

Which country?
I know lots of IBM Aus fags and they laugh at the sinking ship they are a part of.

Attached: 1534934696104.png (804x863, 389K)

Attached: levi hyperledger.jpg (1160x4120, 1.02M)

prove me wrong. VeChain has no intention of revealing their authority nodes, hence the platform is not trustless nor decentralized. Economic nodes held by retail investors do not contribute to the network in any way.

as the last few days have shown, VeChain's NFC/RFID tech is comically bad. IBM will be making chips smaller than a grain of sand. And they have already acquired over 90 enterprise customers. With the infrastructure to support them all and more.

Also I forgot to mention IBM is really fucken lazy, they rather aquire tools and projects then out source them out. So enjoy that Indian code grade.

Attached: intel kelly olson.jpg (1199x862, 235K)

Attached: selman accord levi hyperledger.jpg (1088x1888, 362K)

OP utterly BTFO

Attached: sibs18blkchn.jpg (1152x2746, 724K)

It's unbelievable to me how fast this went under the radar. I mentioned it a couple weeks after that post and no one knew what I was talking about. There is an undeniable FUD effort trying to keep people in the dark about LINK.

If I remember correctly, there were more email exchanges in the whole thread and a lot of the subsequent exchanges seemed to be against a decentralized oracle solution. I'm all in but what OP is talking about is a real risk.

Attached: 1534383447056.jpg (800x533, 252K)

This faggot gets it. REAL businesses run on regulations and contracts enforced by courts of LAW, nationally as well as internationally. Holy shit, blockchain ain't shit in a real world usecase. Why can't you brainlets understand this? OH RIGHT - you never had a REAL job in a corporation above flipping burgers. MBAs, JDs and anyone else who has just a bit of edumacation you sorely lack, understands this and is laughing their ass off about crypto. Do you Linkies honestly think that a bunch of businesses all around the world are going to use a decentralized oracle network developed by a morbidly obese russian philosopher that is basically run by a cult of NEETs from a racist anime/meme forum who call themselves "The LINK Marines". You really think this shit is going to $1000 one day? In what fucking universe is this sequence of events even remotely possible to actually happen? Wake the FUCK UP Linkies, you're seriously D E L U S I O N A L.

Eh the CBA connections are weak. I’ve seen the Frassanito thing pop up before, but he doesn’t look to be involved.

How am I BTFO? Prove one connection between Chainlink / Smarcontracts and IBM / Hyperledger without grasping at straws. And user, I hold 80k link. I'm just stating facts.

Where you at OP? You need to refute all this evidence anons have provided.

I'm a Managing Consultant for IBM in the US, not some pajeet shitting on the street...I know what I'm talking about

The thing is IIRC you don't have to use Chainlink in a decentralized way. You can write to specific nodes and treat it as a centralized oracle. The cons are data leaks for permissioned environments and that adoption is needed for security, but I'm sure the former can be/is being ironed out by enumerating and addressing those risks, and the latter is simply a function of time.

>muh I sold low

After looking through that intranet page what oracle details have you found?

> Larps as an IBM employee
> Can’t even spell Maersk

>Consultant

kek. you don't matter. you don't know shit.

Can you post more of the documents from the Food Trust? I am a big VEN holder scared shitless of IBM

>Prove one connection between Chainlink / Smarcontracts and IBM / Hyperledger without grasping at straws.

>the Project is pleased to announce that ChainLink, a leading provider of secure oracle services, will develop support for the Accord Project specification. For example, standardized Accord Project service-level-agreements for a ChainLink oracle could be enforced by a smart legal contract using performance data from the source ledger. It is intended that this is one of many such collaborations to improve the process of bringing real-world data into legal contracts.

>The Accord Project operates in collaboration with IBM Blockchain, R3, the International Association for Contract and Commercial Management, IEEE, the Open Identity Exchange, and many others.

medium.com/@accordhq/smart-legal-contracts-and-oracles-36d4eb538a92

What does this have to do with Hyperledger and IBM?

They are using Chain and something called Chaincode to execute smart contracts. Pic relevant

Attached: Capture2.png (1458x791, 176K)

Attached: assblastcalendar.jpg (1000x1338, 1003K)

says the faggot from India

let the adults talk

Ethereum is the biggest scam tech there is in an industry that is 99% scam

Thanks. Chain/chaincode has popped up before. Autists, what say you?

>Do you Linkies honestly think that a bunch of businesses all around the world are going to use a decentralized oracle network developed by a morbidly obese russian philosopher that is basically run by a cult of NEETs from a racist anime/meme forum who call themselves "The LINK Marines".

Yes, if it will save them boatloads of cash.

capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/07/smart-contracts.pdf

Attached: 1534017454985.jpg (630x630, 244K)

The Accord Project posts an article on their own medium page about how great Chainlink is, and bluntly states their partnership, and you're asking what the connection is?

1 0 0 0 E O Y
0
0
0
E
O
Y

Attached: what.png (540x540, 318K)

No seriously, can you connect Chainlink with Hyperledger? I'm not FUDing, I'm just asking...

Attached: 43b28a5b828c2b736b738f331f430671b0d1a6bc.jpg (994x1322, 198K)

Here's your homework:
find out the connection between Hyperledger and the Accord Project

Lol this is a good one wonder if he'll find it

Huh. Who'd a thunk it. I googled Hyperledger, Accord, IBM and Chainlink, and guess what ? There actually is lots of information and connections between all of them. Now I'm not a Managing Consultant or anything fancy like that but can I get a grade on the homework ?

Hey dummies, just because Chainlink is part of an open source project like the Accord Project (which Accord said anyone can join on their twitter post), and Hyperledger is also a partner in this open source project doesn't mean that Hyperledger is using Chainlink. Are you guys retarded or just grasping at straws?

And I'm not trying to FUD cause I own a lot of Link but come on, stop being faggots and show some real proof...

What did you find Sherlock Holmes?

Attached: ibm kim.jpg (3152x4562, 1.56M)

>Biz: you better network because its all about who you know.
>Also Biz: people working on he same project won't interact and are not curious about solving each others problems.

Plenty Dickhead, but like I'm going to report my findings to a fucking larp. You know it's there. Google it yourself, it's a free fucking service Link Marine.

are these the leaked hyperledger emails?

Hyperledger doesn't use anything, you fucking brainlet. Smartcontract platforms, such as Accord use hyperledger. These smartcontract platforms also will require an oracle in order to get info onto the blockchain. Accord and others have said they will be using chainlink.

Yes, the snippets that were posted in the original threads, but the link to the whole mailing list doesn't seem to be working anymore. The order of these conversations is all over the place...

Also they're like one year old. If the project is still open source, we should be able to find up to date mailing lists to see more recent developments, why haven't we been following these emails?

Attached: ibm kim.jpg (3152x4562, 1.4M)

This is incredible, thanks for sharing user. From my understanding IBM is going to license out Hyperledger out to fortune 500 companies and will keep oracle/sourcing api's (chain and chaincode) in house and keep it as part of their offering. Still trying to read into the tech though

lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric
lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric/search?p=Created,,oracles,20,2,0,0

Attached: best-shovel-for-digging-1.jpg (1200x628, 227K)

lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric/topic/17549742#2510
original mail, but link to report is dead
does anyone still have it/can repost?

this thread has made me so bullish on chainlink

You're either really stupid or a troll.
People have posted actual links which state that there are partnerships between the two groups and all you can do is ask "PROVE IT PROVE IT I CANT READ HURRR."
Fuck this board and fuck the trash (ie you) who clutter it up with these asinine larp attempts.

ChainLink Fund

disclosurequest.com/form/chainlink-crypto-fund-lp/0001728696-18-000001/?returnURL=

Mark Wagner:
General Partner - ChainLink Crypto Fund. LP

Hyperledger's Head of Performance and Scalability Working Group

hyperledger.org/blog/2017/06/08/hyperledger-announces-performance-and-scalability-working-group

Boom..

I need to buy more Link.

Don't think thats even related to link.

>hi, is pajeet there?

I agree, user, the links to LINK are really tenuous especially when it seems to mainly be thru an open source project.
I'm still HODL

Sorry to burst your bubble, but don't worry we're still gonna make it

Attached: 08-25-18 at 05.54 AM.jpg (1892x984, 402K)

>going to get BTFO by IBM's gigantic crypto dick
holy fucking shit this is the biggest lie i've ever read on biz. how can someone who purports to be well read in the current business climate make such a claim... IBM's only function is to buy companies to curb the decline of their revenue. it's been happening for years.
IBM ITSELF IS A NOTHING BURGER.
the fact XLM mooned because of IBM goes to show how stupid this market is.
Betting on ancient history... it's like getting a degree in classics and expecting to be rich by default.

Kys you ugly fucking faggot. You’re going to die alone because all you’ve mastered in your pathetic, baby dick of a life is posting your faggot thoughts on a nepalese sweater weaving forum. What did you think you were going to prove? Every fucking FUD thread made by your ilk is continually disproven. All you fucking retarded faggots ever do is bring link MORE attention. You are literally doing the opposite of what your retarded brain is trying so hard to accomplish.

Interesting, looking for Wagner infos on the archive I stumbled upon a thread showing an interesting connection, people in the thread thought the left guy was Wagner when it was Kochis, and it seems like this connection never got brought up again.

Attached: 08-25-18 at 06.19 AM 002.jpg (1138x1072, 311K)

lmao retard

I made that connection.

It was always very obvious to everyone it was Kochis.

I drew a penis on my image

what car is this? I need to know when chainlink reaches 1k

companies will use the chainlink network to fetch data into hyperledger. you understand this process right? doesn't necessarily mean the platform will adopt anything, or else they would probably set up the chainlink network as a part of its own.
same with trade lens, etc

Lamborghini countach

holy fuck OP got BTFO
he will never recover from this

Attached: sergey meetup.jpg (2048x1536, 1.62M)

Jake Paul partnership confirmed

Great question. If this user has looked through all the files, then he should know this. But alas, he does not... because he's a LARPing faggot.

I also work for IBM and I can confirm that what OP says is true. You're all fucked linkies.

Don't forget AXA also tried and tested Chainlink 2 years ago and weren't impressed, now seeking other options. see pic related.

Attached: AXA out.png (653x1200, 478K)

dude fuk off, youre a literal who solutions consultant with no pull or knowledge thats why youre searching your internal repositories for link news.

I've done the same for Oracle where i work. I speak for all of us when i say fuck off you have no pull, and no insider knowledge. Go back to selling MFT solutions and 32 straight quarters of declining revenue you street shitting big blue behemoth.