Your country

why does he have three legs

That's not a leg

Attached: 1562983984820.png (94x112, 30K)

finnic tribes

Attached: Northern_Europe_in_814.jpg (800x513, 78K)

It's gotta be Peru

based
youtube.com/watch?v=zWRbmLs8Ipk

Sumerian and Akkadian

Attached: sumerian.jpg (884x1200, 60K)

There are also the maya

I don't like civilizations

>scythians
>civilization

>maya
>ancient

Pick up a history book.

based

>2000BC
>Not ancient

ok retard

>scythia
>slavs

Attached: what-the.jpg (462x527, 111K)

Greek artifact and you are cringe

>Mayan

Attached: giga.jpg (320x379, 11K)

Theyre not from 2000 bc

Yes they are, the preclassic mayan Civilization

>2000BC

If we say the antiquity ends in 500 AD, then I would say ancient Greece and China.

That's when their civilization started, 300 years after the first pyramids construction

aaah, my ancestors

Attached: paleo11.jpg (500x351, 58K)

No they’re not

because Greeks are better than other people

No. It started 2000-1500 years later, now shut up

How the fuck did nobody say Rome yet?

Attached: 20190714-161211-Eunomos-id3309850.jpg (1108x1280, 238K)

>They are not, because uuuuh.... Uuuhhhhh....
Pick up a history book, or even learn to find some facts off the Internet, it's really simple

You should have a read at this.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_civilization
Even Wikipedia says 2000BC

Everything post Alexander isn't ancient and romeaboos are cringe

Fuck off. There are zero monuments or writing before 300 bc from the Maya. Learn to check the sources and see what they’re about

etruscans obviously

Attached: tuscii.jpg (500x331, 70K)

For me it's Phoenicia

Attached: DC89C08B-67AB-4D3C-BA51-5AF3C6315D0E.jpg (480x360, 17K)

>writing = civilization
cringe

>Ancient History covers all continents inhabited by humans in the 3,000 BC – 500 AD period.

Glad i could help.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history?wprov=sfla1

this thread made me realize i know basically nothing about chinese history. is it worth looking into?

He hasn't learnt how to cope when being wrong, so he's trying to string every nonsensical argument to try prove himself.
It's ok, everybody hates being wrong.

Three kingdoms is FUCKING SWEET

3rd century be for the first mayan writing, keep spreading lies you dishonest retard
Oh and 99% of their monuments except El Mirador are from medieval times

Rome lived on until 15th of August 1461, therefore it is not ancient

Tbf 500-300 BC is still in the ancient eras

>

Attached: Dal53MBXkAcOJeG.jpg (583x554, 53K)

he wasn't wrong though
tribes != civilization
just because there were people living in that area they didn't form a high civilization
you can call them the pre-classical maya culture or proto-mayan cultures, but they definitely weren't advanced enough to be called a civilization
it would be wrong to mix up pre-civilized and non-civilized cultures with actual civilizations
halstatt culture, ubaid culture
classical european/greco-roman civilization, mesopotamian/sumer civilization
see? it's not that hard

Are you actually retarded? Did you forget that people can fucking speak? Having a writing system doesn't make you more civilized, it makes you easier to research

Byzantium was born in the late 4th century. Rome was made in BC times.

They still built no monuments or true cities before 300 bc and 99% of their monuments are from 800-1150 AD
Saying they had a civilization in 2000 bc is retarded

classic mayan age started 200 ad
and if you are comparing this to the old world european ages, the ancient era usually isn't counted after around 500 bc, the start of the classical era
of course that would be a meaningless comparison
the mayan civilization was a first civilization and it stood at the same level as the first old world civilizations around 3000-4000 bc
it's clear that due to the later ending migrations and more restricted environment new world civilizations arrived late relatively to the old world ones

Byzantium was founded in the 7th century bc by Ionians and was already relevant in classical times such as when they rebelled against Athens

This

>The first Maya cities developed around 750 BC, and by 500 BC these cities possessed monumental architecture, including large temples with elaborate stucco façades
I think its fair to say you're no longer tribal if you've evolved into creating complex cities

That’s not 2000 bc

>Having a writing system doesn't make you more civilized

Cope

that was made by greeks and sold to scythians tough if i am not mistaken.

>They still built no monuments or true cities before
The Mayans are an interesting case though, El Mirador in the preclassic was bigger than most later centres, while the classic period didn't really produce any centralised cities unlike Teotihuacan or the postclassic period

The Hyperboreans

Attached: file.png (540x327, 360K)

See>b-but it wasn't a true city!!
Sounding awfully a lot like a tankie

I don’t have favorites in history because I’m not a little child, but the most fascinating and impressive to me are ancient Greece and Egypt

That's wrong. No one counts the first agricultural communities as civilizations. Catal Hüyük wasn't a civilization, Jericho wasn't a civilization. Mayans had agricultural communities, but they didn't have "complex cities", they didn't have an actual civilization before the classical age.

Yes, you’re right.

What does having favourites have to do with being a child?

>flag
For me it's ancient carthaginians. Hannibal's history to me is pretty based, alongside their structure and the cult to their ancient poenician gods.
I've always wondered if the sacrifies to Baal were true or just roman slandering and rewriting history.

Because nothing about it is interesting.

Great observation, but 2000BC is when they already started building a complex society

No, it’s not

Shut up

people having favorites in history is how we end up with experts on those things

Nabateens (my ancestors :))

What's wrong?

What part of "large temples and elaborate stucco facades" did you not see? I'm pretty sure it's a bit more than just a basic agricultural town if it has city monuments and large scale projects that only could have been done if people had other jobs than cultivating crops

Those developed in 300 bc, not 2000 bc
Now shut up

Yes, it is.

The atlantis

I believe you've mixed up your dates. Hieroglyphic writing developed in 300bc, not architectural prowess.

Agriculture does not equal a complex society

El Miador is mostly from 300 bc, not 2000 bc

Give the kid a break, it's not his fault that he's a brainlet

Another retard

Yes it does. It means people can be assigned jobs other than finding food, and people will start to have societal roles like carpenter, architect, soldier, etc. A smaller part of the society will be cultivating food. That's how civilization is born.

For further reading, see:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_society

China

Attached: 1562084286188.png (1000x1000, 569K)

Imbeciles

Attached: 1563175971114.jpg (750x562, 58K)

>El mirador is the only thing the mayans built in the ancient era

pls, don't embarrass yourself more

No, shut up. agriculturalists start as bands or at best tribes. Antropology 101

central asian civilisations

therefore i think the mongols are the worst people that ever lived

>rome
>not interesting
Nigga what? The late republic is one of the most interesting periods in human history

They never had any unique civilization.

>the mayan civilization was a first civilization and it stood at the same level as the first old world civilizations around 3000-4000 bc
The MesoAmericans were actually pretty advanced in several ways. They had better sanitation/hygiene standards then the Spaniards, better urbanized cities and historians have always commended them fot having more effective medicinal practises them Spain at the time of their first contact.
They were progressing terrifyingly fast.

Post some others then, cretin.

DUDE WEED

Nah. Romans never had anything original about them. They just took stuff from others and improved it. yes, Greeks did the same, and that's why they aren't interesting either.

Yeah the Mongols like other steppe populations assimiliated into civilizations more then vice-versa. Otherwise they were just steppehorde #5662 albeit the most successful ones.

only sumerians were original

>Greeks did the same
No they didn't. As someone whose surname is Greco and who's studied Greek history since he was in his crib I can tell you don't know what you're talking about

Attached: bronzi riace.jpg (876x568, 62K)

Another retard.

Nuragic because my ancestors :)

Attached: BARUMINI_COMPLETO.jpg (967x684, 223K)