Do the people in your country honestly believe in this shit? (pls no joke related to my flag)

what's your hypothesis then?

Maybe in yours

Attached: download.jpg (227x222, 11K)

adam and eve

Attached: munch munch.gif (500x665, 998K)

Attached: braziliankiss.png (126x97, 30K)

More cousins. We don't descend from pic related, we have common ancestors

somebody post the dancing brazilian ape

Monkey

Attached: 20190706_151813.jpg (2560x1212, 699K)

It doesn't mean we're monkey retard

>im monky
ok murtad

what's their ethnicity?

Black.
I recommend you to read abot Yakub

you guys basically believe that life came from nothing with the perfect mix of water and earth and oxygen and you're trying to make fun of the belief that a God created man saying "dude we ain't come from dirty lmaao"

Beautiful

Attached: munchy munch.gif (304x305, 449K)

Yes

para de usar hxh pra defender suas loucuras, crente burro

We can prove that complex organic molecules will eventually form in a soup of hot water and the materials present in earth at that time.
You can't prove God made it, you can say "Have faith and look at this apple it fills my stomach and I'm no longer hungry God made it for us and this is proof" or something like that.

>dude, LIFE came from literally nothing without the help of anything lifeless elements basically "hit the jackpot"
>hold on you really believe a Being from the Upper Echelons created us? and that we have a soul? and that all came into being from the particles of dust that he also created that same week? lfmao we came from animals my duuude also weed and porn is good

Attached: 1526394000952.jpg (1024x683, 121K)

go back here and never escape again, shonenshitter. I won't say it twice

Zoomers do, boomers don't.

you on the right

Attached: web01signed.jpg (912x900, 323K)

There is a difference between knowing and believing, you stupid monkey.

>you can explain things using your "science" while we can't explain the entity we believed created everything, in fact it's so beyond us we cannot comprehend how it works at all!

yes. faith works like that, otherwise it wouldn't be faith, dum-dum
you can screech, shout and roll on the ground seething, your tiny brain can only accept what ((they)) tell you is truth

Attached: kura phone.jpg (1280x720, 250K)

Making things up and ignoring data to see your results is two different things and even that doesn't happen because studies are peer reviewed for that exact reason.
You can say that the universe itself was created by God and that's fine you can believe whatever you want in that regard but he didn't create humans and put them here.
Are fossilized records false then? Do you think you have a ((big brain)) because you are onto ((their)) made up history or something? You realize there were human records before the creation of the world according to the Bible.
And don't start with the
>God made the fossils too!
Saying that just means the universe could've sprung into existence a moment ago and all your memories were made by God too.

why is the last evolutionary stage always a white man?

You do understand that science is all about publishing your work so everyone can see if you made a mistake, right?

Because white skin is a relatively new thing.

surely we would have better credentials on evolution by now if that was always the case, wouldn't we?

>believes in god
>watches animu

degenerate

Because the mutts come next

youtu.be/NArlXzSFt2Y
Educate yourself imbecile isolated islands and extreme environments can accelerate evolution

>we would have better credentials on evolution by now
What?

whatever. man indeed came from monky

can some mod archive this thread? I'm going to sleep

Attached: 1538243728008.png (496x464, 109K)

The government, the media and teachers in far less than the Internet would have you believe.
In fact believing this is the sheep opinion, and a convenient one too.

>Whatever I'm going to bed my brain can't handle something that clashes with my believes

Lie far less than*
My bad.

Attached: 1537867822910.jpg (550x977, 250K)

so is civilization hmmmm

Well, yes.

Yes. If those things wouldn't have happened we wouldn't be here asking stupid questions.

praytell what do you believe instead, magic?

>unironically denying evolution
I see American evangelical "Christianity" is still gaining ground in Brasieu

Attached: evolution-of-pesticide-resistance.jpg (1403x1056, 173K)

>Brazilians and Mutts dont believe in evolution despite the fact they have it easier to see the transition from monkey to man
Lmao how stupid can they be

Attached: 1546344510397.gif (600x580, 472K)

You would expect Huemonkeys to believe evolution the most considering each stage is found in Brazil.

Damn, so funny. Can't take your hands or brain away from your double KFC Cheetoburger dinner to make anything more creative, can you. Injecting more fat in that disgusting beast-like form that you call your body is more important

Brazilians just never evolved further

Why are you learning from us then?

Attached: 1563194929385.jpg (600x497, 44K)

We did the next stage after White is Mutt

Go starve and get shot in the favelas little monkey boy.

>

Attached: american shape.jpg (1200x677, 53K)

creation - ha ha

user . . . this is not how science works at all
science works on a basis of pear review
to put it simply, it works thanks to huge scientists' ego - every scientist biggest dream is to show how everyone around them is stupid and they are smart
whenever a new idea is presented in scientific community you think there is circle-jerking "yes-yes great idea, monkeys are our great parents fart-fart"?

NO! everyone wants to find flaws in the presented idea to show how much the author is stupid compared to them. Some modern ideas are hard effort to criticize and require years of research (planning and modifying experiments, performing them, sorting out the data, checking the math etc. etc.). Sometimes it takes almost a century for someone to find flaws in presented research (for one of the most famous cases refer to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_drop_experiment - it was shown that the error in the original experiment is much larger than originally presented)

The thing with evolution theory is that it is and was generally disliked since a lot of people people a) take it personally b) don't really have an understanding of what it is. So it was one of the most attacked theories ever. And yet it still holds (granted that it did see a lot of modifications with new discoveries, modern theory of evolution is based on Darwin's but is not identical to it)

t. a PhD

uma delicia

I don't get it
How does finding two identical fossils disprove the theory of evolution?

>Pear review
Hahhaha

youtube.com/watch?v=lBXvrLsq1Mk

Remaining identical would be we never evolved. Because evolution is the transformation of a specie. So we would need more different fossils

unfortunately, a good portion of the retards here do not

t. butthurt atheist

humans are a mix between alien, pig and primate DNA

But we also find different fossils
You're basically saying that because identical twins exist evolution isn't possible, which is nonsensical

That comic strip means that we have only a few species of fossils while most of them are duplicates. Evolution means more species than duplicates.

>only a few species of fossils
>Evolution means more species than duplicates
What? Who told you this?

Is your great great father a duplicate or a different specie compared to you?

What the fuck does that question even mean?

Same species but slightly different skeleton
What is your point?

What a stupid question, you need unbiased education you poor uneducated person, I sincerely hope that your country becomes wealthier so that it can afford this.

wish there was a big brained homo boskop around to explain this to the brazilian

If he is a slightly different specie than this proves evolution is real

I don't get it, believing what? I just see six honest and upstanding Brazilian citizens in the picture.

>Netherlands: "What that question mean?"
>Australia: "Thats stupid question"
>France: Answers the question.

No it doesn't
Also evolution happens over a much longer time span.
I sincerely hope you're trolling, if not, just know you don't understand how evolution works at all and you're running on strawmen arguments

That's not how evolution or species works.
His genome is different to mine but he is the same species as me. Also you can't view evolution on an individual basis, it's about populations.

>Hahhaha
DONT YOU HAHA ME ILL LET YOU KNOW I GRADUATED TOP OF MY PEAR CLASS ...

Attached: pearreview.png (489x400, 113K)

>evolution happens over a much longer time span.
How long is time of evolution a million years? After a milion years you change like magic over night or you do it slowly each generation? Don't you know that different species evolve faster than the other you dummy.

>Also you can't view evolution on an individual basis, it's about populations.
Everything that spread as populations starts individually.

Based

b8

Yes, but evolution is still a theory on populations, not individuals.

Evolution happens as an adaptation to an ever changing environment, if there is no environmental pressure then no evolution is necessary. Adaptation can take different forms and be equally successful in passing the genes on.

Evolution is not a disproof of God's existence, it's just what governs the kinds of different lifeforms on earth.

Evolution happens when one single individual changes the population by replacing it

?
make an example

I think you want to learn so you are asking so apologies if this is the case.
We in developed countries take it for granted that people have access to the same information that we use on a daily basis. But you have the internet and YouTube so there is no excuse to not finding the truth. Good luck.

>Evolution happens as an adaptation to an ever changing environment
The most fit individual will populate and replace the others that can't adapt.

No that's wrong
Evolution happens because some genes are more successful than others, which leads to an overall change in a population

It happens because some individuals with those genes are more successful than others.

Because the genes granted them a selective advantage. You have to view natural selection in terms of genes and populations, not individuals.

The gene make the individual. The individual make the population.

>individual
no

take the example similar to the one Darwin made
a group of birds find themselves on an island
on this island the fruit grows with thick shells
of the males, one has a longer, sharper beak, and one has a short, dull beak.
not by much just a normal difference withing a species.
the bird with the longer beak is able to break the shell of the fruit more easily, meaning he can eat more, he is more healthy and has more nergy, therefore he can mate more.
say he mates 8 times during his life.
the bird with the short beak takes a lot of time to break the shells, he is weak and has to rest more, he mates but only 4 times during his life.
say for every time the birds mate 4 eggs hatch.
so the new generation will have
>16 birds who are sons of the dull beak bird
>32 birds who are sons of the dull beak bird
the 32 sharp beaked bird now possess a characteristic that is more desirabe and more useful for surviving in this particular environmental niche, therefore they will mate more.
the 16 dull beaked bird, in turn, possess a characterstic that offers no advantage, and therefore will be gradually eliminated from this species.
it's not an individual, it's generations of individials that define which genes are passed down.

it's not a single individual, it's a combination of genes.

You can't afford to call anyone IT a dummy.
Evolution happens all the time, randomly and most fit genes that allow for a better survival/natural selection end up being passed on and amplified over the course of literal generations, yes. It takes a huge amount of time, it's not always easily noticeable, and our grandparents do not form a different specie from us.
Sapiens and Neanderthals were different species though.