CHAINLINK

I hear it over and over again. "ChainLink could take 2-3 years before real usage comes in. If you are not patient enough, you shouldn't buy"

This is complete bullshit. You can't time the market and tell the perfect buying point. Not the month or year of a bullrun or adoption phase of a specific coin. The big guys like capgemini or whatever are estimating their predictions in 1-2 years. A technology like blockchain and smart contracts with even more spread 3-5 years. (*capgemini stated that real world adoption of smart contracts begins around 2020-2025*).

Ethereum is in now way used by real people or real companys outside of crypto world yet, but had a run from 8$ to 1400$. Is it because they got their product finished? Did they have real world adoption now (not companys forking it or building prototype products)? Do they have x companys doing 10.000 tx a day now? No.

Remember, there is not THE CRYPTO WORLD thats gonna get flooded by the people. You can't convert the masses into a new world. We have to wrap our blockchain stuff into the real world products to get it used by the people. And this takes a huge ton of time. But the money you want to make is a lot earlier there. Starting at the nerdis from Jow Forums, going over to reddit and twitter into television. The Television point was only reached by bitcoin in end 2017.

So what I actually want to say with this is... ChainLinks bullrun will not come after everything is set up and in clear sight. It will come after certain things are in sight or another big breadcrumb comes. It ignites like a fire. Best example is Ethereum or NANO.

Attached: 0e0649c6.jpg (1920x1280, 519K)

Ethereum was literally dead after the DAO. Lot's of early money sold and dropped Ethereum out of their mind as futuristic super computer. Months later, after bleeding and nothing than some dev updates, price starts to gain in value. Out of nothing. Just speculation or TA. Its rising and rising and just doesnt stop. There was no big news, no partnership and the tech was almost the same as 6 month ago. The price is 95% of the time not correlated to the development or news. It's correlated to emotions after them being ignited.

Take NANO for example. They have an finished product, a DAG based currency which works perfectly since YEARS. You can transact in seconds with no fees. This was possible in early 2017 too, when ethereum had it's run. The tech was there since years, but it started gaining a huge ton in value late 2017 and just had the biggest bull run of all cryptos ever.

August 2017 traded at less then 2 cents. 0.02$. January 2018. 4 months later, it traded at 37$. That's +180.000% gain. The tech didn't really changed. They just published a wallet and started marketing.

That was just a payment coin. No imagine what an network of oracles can do, which can utilized by any blockchain.. Ethereum, Hyperledger, R3. Everything thats going to be used by people and companys to implement smart contracts in their products and processes. Imagine what a network of oracle nodes can do that brings the whole (+96%) banking landscape via PSD2 into the reach of any blockchain platform and smart contracts. They dont have to setup their banking products onto the blockchain platform from scratch and they would never do that. With ChainLink they have a plug and play bridge, with the highest security (trustless, 100% uptime, completely tamperproof) you can imagine.

Sergey want's to avoid eth's embarrassing PnD.
It will moon and stay there only when it is ready.
It might be in 3 months, it might be in 3 years.

ChainLink is developing since +3 years. It can explode any time now without having the clear sight of it being used by all the fancys crypto startups. We dont need adoption first to moon. Money comes first, then adoption.

The runup always comes earlier than 90% of people think, and will reach higher than 99% of people think. Thats what happened to the real projects in 2016-2018. Ethereum, Antshares, RaiBlocks which all didn't care about marketing first and just developed the product. ChainLink will move the highest amount of money with a huge ton of collateral out of any of these platforms because it is the bridge for every blockchain and the banking landscape.

Ari Paul is a smart guy. But the video thats going aroung on twitter and discord of him saying ChainLink would'nt be interesting for now because customers are +6 month away is laughable. The best moment to get in is yesterday and he probably knows that.

All the experts in the crypto field liek Nick Szabo, Gavin, Andreas A. are endorsing ChainLink and calling it already the decentralized oracle standard. They would'nt write a single word into their book if it's just some startup which is trying.. Not the meme is calling ChainLink the future standard oracle product.. the blockchain pioneers do.

Attached: Screenshot_20180606-075532.jpg (1080x1920, 792K)

OP is right. Link will moon far before anything remotely close to mainstream adoption of smart contracts occurs. This should be pretty obvious...

I will tell you why Chainlink is a scam:
1. They embed public API calls information directly into the Ethereum blockchain, meaning the storage cost of the data itself will be astronomical
2. There is no way to call any private APIs because your API key will be leaked due to the public nature of Ethereum
3. You are assuming that companies would be willing to pay a fee of 10 cents per call. (Which is entirely ridiculous, one of my apps runs nearly 100k api calls per day and I pay only 300 dollars/month)
4. You are assuming companies will pay 10 cents/call to receive "decentralized" data, such as prices of stocks, when they already own multimillion dollar contracts with companies specifically built to provide accurate data (plus you can get your money back if the data isn't accurate from a company, rather than having no one to answer for mistakes)
5. You assuming companies will wait 30+ seconds for an API call, which would place them at a disadvantage of any other competitor who is using a centralized system
It's clear to me that no LINK holders have experience actually using APIs or are in the corporate space, and I feel bad for them when they will get burned, kek

Maybe, maybe not. There needs to be fuel to make that happen which we lack at the moment. The 2017 bullrun was ignited by Ethereum but the market had bottomed and was primed for a catalyst that would create another bubble.

Based on my calculations we won’t completely bottom until the end of January. Until we reach that LINK won’t moon. The other thing is enthusiasm. I don’t have a way to gauge it, but it’ll have to be there like it was on Jow Forums from Summer 2017 to Winter 2018.

I think main net and partners will drop between now and EOY. My personal is estimate for the impact of that is $5-10. From there I expect thing to be pretty quiet until Q1-Q3 2019. We could see $50-100 by the end of 2019 or $100-200 by the end of 2020 if LINK ignites. If another bubble forms expect $400+.Just my analysis.

Any other Transwomen find the whole "I'm trans but i love having a cock" thing to be strange?

There are so many places on the internet where Transwomen love to show off "their rock hard clits" or take pictures where they pass perfectly but make sure to ruin it by having a huge bulge under their shorts.

I honestly think it's stupid to claim to be suffering from gender dysphoria and that you want to live as a woman but also love having a dick, taking pictures of it, and using it to fuck things.

If we reach a $10-20 Trillion bubble expect $1000-2000 LINK.

I will tell you why it's actually a scam.
The team fundraises millions in ETH, to promote a service product that they already get paid in USD for. They keep millions of tokens for themselves (at ATH Sergey's stack was worth 70 million USD with zero product whatsoever).
THEN THEY SELL THE REST OF THE FUCKING TOKENS FOR ACCESS TO THE NETWORK.
How many times are these assholes going to get paid!?

>all etf's denied but one
>only faith in crypto is from neets and few techies
Sorry I don't think we are hitting that valuation

link is normie poison. no one wants a utility tolen they dont understand. look how pitiful that volume is.

>to promote a service product that they already get paid in USD for

Weak fud, fag. How were they running decentralized oracles before?

If you were born past 1985, you literally have zero excuse to have transitioned later than 12-15. “Transgender” was one google search of news headline away. You had access to online hormones, you could have gotten a job, you could have paid for your hormones and done it secretly until you turned 18. I see so many transgirls make excuses for this and litterally non hold up.

You know what I mean fagzilla.
Chainlink is the brand of their centralised service too now.
But who gaf about any of that shit if they can sell ethereum tokens to neets for the next 2 years

R: 17 / I: 3
Any help here? Every time I see a woman, the first thing I look at is the clothing and get jealous about how much cuter it is than my own. I'm attracted to women, but I also get this feeling of jealousy about how they look. I like to imagine what it would be like to be Small and have long hair. I hate body hair and like smooth skin. Like to imagine what I think it would feel like to have sex as a girl. I like dicks, but I'm not really a fan of my own (I could take it or leave it honestly) This is my generally feeling regardless of if I'm horny or not. I don't think I'm trans, I'm pretty masculine and manly. I don't see myself as a girl. What's going on here?

dont waste your time here dude. this subchannel is a shell of its former self. im all in link and bought eth at $20 and sold and put all profit for the most part into LINK. people on here now are too fucking dumb to understand link and people irl give you a flouride/npc stare when you try to explain what an oracle even is. I believe you and what you are trying to say but I think you should conserve your effort for another 4-6 weeks. we are getting another run up by BTC around the time Bakkt/ETF is unleashed. That will help LINK and also the developments and partnerships, progress with SWIFT due for a late 2018 will significantly help as well.

I agree, they just won't get it.

In fact, not even after the adaption, I think, normies will get it. They will see the price going up, for sure.

But they will never understand why. Just like normies don't realize how huge the read network of a country is. They just take it in street by street.

Thanks

I don't care either way. Every Link I buy goes into a wallet never to be touched until we are living in a new economy. With LINK, my hands are made of ultra dense neutron stars. I like my job. I am fine working and accumulating until LINK changes the financial and legal world.

Who gives a fuck about their centralized services. How would they manage to have a decentralized network without the tokens, brainlet?

CHECKED

>subchannel

Fagchannel

Why would uou focus on that and completely ignore that they still hold 70% of supply, and intend to sell it on market.
At the very least they intend to control volitility, which is code for suppress price.

Old FUD, nice pasta. Debunked directly by ChainLink team. We are not selling.

Ok, so what's going to happen to the circulating supply is a certain amount of the tokens being held for institutions etc? I know node operators have an incentive to hold LINK and that should reduce the supply as well right?

Respect man !

I’m on this board since like June 2017. And I still don’t get if link is a meme or not.

This resonates a lot with me.

Attached: Screenshot_14.png (582x385, 193K)

Than you're a fucking moron.

ari paul is a kike. it's not a question of what he knows or if he's right or wrong, it's that he speaks only to manipulate the market. he's only saying what he's saying to increase his position, not yours.

The token economics are shit. The team still has 350 million tokens to sell on market.
How does that compare to your 2k?

Weak FUD, most of the link is going to enterprise institutions you insufferable faggot

>than

Oh the irony

Fair argument, not my first language.

How can I shrink/kill my penis? Im 3 years hrt and fulltime for a while, but whenever I get aroused erections still happen. It's fairly dysphoria inducing and really gets in the way. I feel like I would be a lot more comfortable with myself if i had a small thing that couldnt get erect. surgery's expensive, how can I keep this shit under control? thanks

this is actually my mode of thinking as well.