MY NANI STAY SUPER FANCY
$100.000 EOY!
MY NANI STAY SUPER FANCY
Nolan James
Other urls found in this thread:
reddit.com
accenture.com
archive.is
nanode.co
reddit.com
news.kucoin.com
reddit.com
quora.com
archive.is
twitter.com
Andrew Perry
even with the Zimbabwe dollar conversion you are way off...
No fuckin way that shit will ever be worth 276.31943 USD
Grayson Johnson
Yeah, but if it goes to Bitcoin marketcap, then we are talking about thousands of dollars
NANO $1000 EOY!
Joseph Lewis
>Nano has 756 TPS [1]. For a self-proclaimed global currency, it’s a total joke. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [2]. Nano’s claim to be global currency is either delusional or fraud.
>7,000 TPS was boosted and promoted in Dec 2016. Reality, a meagre 100-200 TPS [3].
>Lead Devs are jumping ship. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and future problems.
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that Devs are dumping Nano in a fire sale [4].
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through that in a matter of 1-3 years [4]. Also; pending lawsuit against Nano foundation.
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times [5], every single month. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency. One example from yesterday [6].
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [5] [6]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. Not ready for global adoption.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography, disaster in waiting.
Levi Ward
(cont.)
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy. Doomed. Will go to zero.
>Nano essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon/eBay/etc will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano’s publicly stated “strategy” is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilising high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model.
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [7]
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano has no ‘human face’ for people to connect with. It’s just an empty logo, unlike other top 10 coins – e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Ongoing lawsuits against Nano Devs personally and Nano foundation. Will drive price down, could go bankrupt.
Josiah Turner
(cont.)
>Same whales that pumped and dumped Nano first time (-98% from ATH) are doing it again. The delusional Nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>NANO was less than $0.10 a year ago.
>Former head of engineering at Facebook, Bryan Veloso: Nano "just a hype...no real use case" [8].
>Anyone investing in this shitcoin deserves to lose their money. It will crash and go to zero.
[1] reddit.com
[2] accenture.com
[3] archive.is
[4] nanode.co
[5] reddit.com
[6] news.kucoin.com
[7] reddit.com
[8] quora.com
Bentley Phillips
See
Luis Rodriguez
This FUD was debunked a week ago
Jose Wood
>This FUD was debunked a week ago
Yeah, right. Same stupid lie from the Nano robots again and again.
Bentley Scott
Why do you have such faith in this shitcoin? you wouldn't be from /reddit/ would you now user?
Ian Walker
>t. Typical Nano hodler, assraped since Jan 2016, thinking its a good idea to buy some more, while screaming "2 da mooOooooon!!".
Nathaniel Williams
IOTA is over 800 TPS
educate yourself
Jason Cruz
I getting a sort of “purchaser-of-raiblocks-at-$34” vibe from you brotha
Andrew Gutierrez
Educate myself about what? Your rambling about IOTA is pointless and incoherent. Nice red herring and straw man fallacy.
Lincoln Lopez
I never trusted Shapiro and bomber. I got out. Was disgusted by the treatment the Bitgrail victims got from the community and devs. Looked more into the tech and sold everything before it crashed.
Jaxon Evans
I never said i trust Nano dev team, i just told it's gonna moon soon, i will make my 5x profits and buy another coin (probably Pivx, looks undervaluated)
Gavin Cox
Why? Give me one good reason why this shitcoin should moon, and especially after being artificially pumped 4x in less than 2 weeks already. Nano is the most hyped coin in the market, with the most hot air and fluff, with really bad fairy tale tech, where it is always somewhere in the future all the bugs and shortcomings will be fixed. This coin will never be a global coin. Nano is dead as disco.
Cooper Lewis
That doesn't even rhyme you fucking idiot, LINK 1K EOY
Cooper Sullivan
Imagine being this autisticly booty bungled over an imaginary internet coin
Noah Miller
Do you have a link to the one where whales are dumping again?
Adam Bailey
133 NANO is 21 BTC in supply. Not exactly breaking the bank to hold that much, unless you are pajeet tier.
Connor Howard
Yeah , this faggot lurks for nano posts 24/7 .
Like he is some kind of savior for the people , more likely a salty bagholder now balls deep in some other shit.
Jose Diaz
Imagine you being so autistic that you respond. Imagine being you investing in shitcoin nano, despite being unable to refute a single point.
Isaiah Wood
That "argument" makes zero sense
Logan Wilson
Yet another nano robot on autopilot spewing the same incoherent ad hominem garbage when presented with facts against his fairy tale coin, that has nothing but illusions and delusions.
Kevin Gomez
Typical nano investor. Zero tech knowledge. Does not care. Hates facts. Loves his fairy tale coin from la la land with insane problems and frozen withdrawal/deposits every single month. Multiple times . Want some drugs?
Nathaniel Reyes
Not an argument. When I first used BTC(2011), I didn't get it. I would have been much better off hedging against my own bias and buying just enough to not feel like a total tool.
It's what I'm recommending others do with NANO. Nanites view the removal of fees while keeping decentralization the last step to global adoption. No fees & instant means no learning about confirmations or blocks.
Wouldn't you want to be prepared, just in case they are right? It's only 133 NANO.
Aiden Turner
if nothing less it will become the ultimate arbitage tool superceding LTC while being free and fast
Benjamin Ramirez
There is an unlimited shit-projects that I have a "bias" against. Using your logic I should buy something from them all, distributing my assets to all the shitprojects in whole world. How does that make any sense. Nanodrones are following hype only. Like this guy still running around with old 7000 tps lie, when reality was 100-200 tps.
(archive.is
This is the level of insanity and pure delusion from Nanodrones. Even when facts are documented and presented for them, they STILL post proven lies about their nano.
James Thomas
Imagine being so upset you need to respond twice
Nathan Carter
Ok when you think back on this in a few years, try not to kill yourself.
Also, yes buy 21 BTC in shitcoins if you think they will reach adoption when the issues are worked out. Do it when the coins are shitcoins and noone is looking.
Leo James
I bet this guys work is sucking dicks and his only break from his miserable life is when his masters let him shitpost about Nano.
Get over it faggot, Nano is not some complex scam and no one is being tricked into buying it.
Aaron Watson
At best Nano will be on coinbase late 2019, due to all the technical problems. If not more devs leave the team and they have not burned through all their reserves and actually are able to solve their technical problems. One year after the competitors. Nano will crash and go to zero.
Hudson Parker
>I posted it again!!!
Maybe if I make an image people will find it easier to counter this lie.
Mason Nelson
Still double the tps as LTC (being that that is 6 months outdated i'd like to see an updated test to see if it breaks the 105-306tps speeds now) and still free.
For arbitrage it'd still be the better tool to use.
Daniel Bennett
Typical fanatic nanodrone trying to formulate logically sound counter-arguments. Has nothing and must again retort to mudslinging and childish ad hominem attacks. Nano is for delusional people that lives on dreams and hate reality. Want some drugs?
Sebastian Peterson
You went to far with your larp. You and I know these coins don't die at zero. They die when volume dies.
Either you bought high (decrease your DCA now) or you are trying to dip the price. Hedge your bets user.
Robert Lee
This is a winner takes all market. You are not competing with LTC, you are competing with the best of the best. Nano has no chance. Will crash and go to zero.
Jose Fisher
No. See
Jaxson Gray
So you sold and now want it to fail. Stay classy.
Adrian Mitchell
I sold and wish to warn investors that have been lied to. Like this lie You want to scam them. Pic related (guarantee given 4 days before Bitgrail admitted insolvency and enormous loss for Nano investors). Hope you sleep well at night.
Michael Lopez
get in the vano, nano
William Carter
I have 90 coins and bought XRB at $0.11. I literally cannot lose at this point. Your advice is bad propaganda.
133 NANO is what it takes to have 21 BTC of nano in equivalent supply.
Charles Butler
So you are invested in all the 1901 cryptocurrencies listed on CMC? If not, why not? You should, according to your investment "strategy".
Owen Rogers
>girls and boys
Ian Smith
No, only the ones that will likely reach adoption. There are a suprisingly large amount. Some will fail.
I do this all day every day with a startup / comp sci background. Most things are scripted and I host nodes too.
Probably not the right strategy for slow people.