Anglo bulls

Are you dumb? Eisenhower and Nimitz were both German. MacArthur was Scottish but they still aren't Anglos.

Scots are Anglos. Even Irish are Anglos. Even kiwis are British descent of Anglos. Anglo is blood, not nationality.

>Anglos are strategic and cunning
lol what strategic or cunning have anglos ever done? subjugate some abbos? doesn't take much strategic thinking. frankly there's not one anglo that is close to the war geniuses of alexander the great, julius caesar, napoleon or rokossovsky.

Cope.

>Scots are Anglos. Even Irish are Anglos.
Are you trying to summon them?

aussies kept getting assraped by yamato bvlls until the japanese HQ ditched the irrelevant PNG campaign, not to mention singapore alone was the biggest capitulation in the history of british military. also the vast majority in the southern pacific died from starvation and disease as your picture shows.

Attached: pacific theatre.gif (1570x806, 915K)

Every sane educated person could see Japan's war is desperate

>Anglos are better at warfare than Germans.
LMAO. Also hand in your guns. The muslamic PM you got demands it for the good of the Ummah

Attached: 14.jpg (850x500, 88K)

>Germanic
Why are my countrymen so braindead?

Anglo=/=Anglo-Saxon in modern terminology. English are mutts of Anglo-Saxons, Britons, and a manner of Celtic and Germanic tribes as well. The fact is all the people of the British Isles are closely connected with each other through, even more so than they are with the rest of Europe. Unless they have recent ancestors that hail outside the Isles.

>T.J*w

Brits ruled the largest, most lattitudal and most longitudinal empire in history.

Singapore was the most humiliating battle in Britain's history, so I give you guys credit for that. However Australia did amazing in the Pacific fighting one of the world's strongest nations.

Didn't you forget? My great grandpapa was from Bavaria. Never mind he was a quarter Jewish, I am a soldier of hyperGermania and off to save the white race!

>Brits ruled the largest, most lattitudal and most longitudinal empire in history.
doesn't take much strategic thinking or cunning to build lots of ships and subjugate primitive tribal peoples. the moment brits went against white people, they got their asses kicked (see american independence war or napoleon who btfo'd brits for decades until russians joined in).

Britain was basically the only european country to colonise actual civilisations though

Allies cut the supply lines and caused starvation and disease. POWs were first to go because the priority is always to those fighting.

>Anglo got wrecked

Attached: ww2 battle.jpg (1650x1600, 1.06M)

you do know you guys lost right?

>muslamic PM

bruh you dumb...

Nope

you do know you guys lost your colony thanks to us?

Attached: naked briton in tokyo.jpg (468x269, 51K)

Japs died in high numbers because of their idiotic infantry tactics. They knew banzai charges were wasteful, but they still used them

Anglos are just as mechanically intelligent though.
Ford? Anglo descendant
First tank? Brits

That doesn't say much.
The Allied victory in WW2 is pretty much a Pyrrhic victory. The only country that fully committed to the war and left it in a good position was the U.S and mainly due to the geographic isolation.
After WW2 all countries "turned down" the tune at least a bit and made the previous League of Nation """"""""work""""""""" as the U.N, the Cold War is like that due to the fear of a global escalation worst than the second, so came the large usage of proxy wars and yadda yadda.

But if you are question the Japanese decisions in ww2 by itself than i would agree it was pretty dumb.

>idiotic infantry tactics
true
but no banzai attack to commercial ships please

Attached: USS Fitzgerald.jpg (1862x1048, 265K)

so? we lost them all mate

IIRC, world war 2 combined with independence movements made it economically a negative.

>you guys lost right
WW2 was technically a win for Japan by the Vietnam war logic.

Attached: 30 vs 3 million.jpg (688x2019, 453K)

and the Vietnman logic is wrong. your country pussed out and couldn't hack it.

>doesn't take much strategic thinking or cunning to build lots of ships and subjugate primitive tribal peoples.
then why didnt finland do it? or every country in europe for that matter

>muhhhhh island nation

Attached: hot nips.webm (1280x720, 1.81M)

>Anglos are just as mechanically intelligent though
Yeah true. Scotland in particular was very industrious.

Vietnam War would have gone very differently if America dropped nukes on Hanoi

amen

>The British prime minister, Winston Churchill, called it the "worst disaster" in British military history.

Attached: BritishSurrender.jpg (800x548, 62K)

>building the largest empire in human history is easy we finns we just too busy ice fishing and polishing Sven's boots which is real strategic and cunning

As I said earlier, Singapore was the most humiliating event in British history, and I give kudos to Japan to pulling that off. However that doesn't change the fact that Britain was the greatest empire of all time.

he called what the 'worst disaster'?

WW2 Japan

Larger kill counts than the Allies
conquered entire Asia
butchered chinks to the level where they are still mega butthurt
"Honorary Aryan" approved by Hitler
gave Britain the biggest humiliation

Looks like our gramps achieved so many accomplishments.

>Pound: Prime Minister, I have to report to you that the Prince of Wales and the Repulse have both been sunk by the Japanese – we think by aircraft. Tom Phillips is drowned.
>Churchill: Are you sure it's true?
>Pound: There is no doubt at all.
>Churchill hangs up
>In all the war, I never received a more direct shock... As I turned over and twisted in bed the full horror of the news sank in upon me. There were no British or American ships in the Indian Ocean or the Pacific except the American survivors of Pearl Harbor, who were hastening back to California. Across this vast expanse of waters, Japan was supreme, and we everywhere were weak and naked.[54]

Attached: japsamurai.jpg (240x332, 27K)

>still lost
Lmao

>have two entire oceans to yourself, a feat utterly unprecedented in military history
>lose in less than half decade
Clearly the Japanese are utter incompetents that got lucky once.

ok? cool. good for you. but you got nuked. twice. never forget that.

thrice, actually, as we nuked ourselves recently.
and never forget that japan is the sole nuke harden country on the planet.

Attached: 1553853076816.jpg (196x257, 6K)

hey could you do us a favour and wipe out the Chinese please? just had some Japanese guests staying with me. lovely people. they bring those green-tea kitkats. I'm ok with Japs. but the Chinese are fucking awful. and there's nearly 2 billion of those scum.

It's not even need to enter in the nuances of the Vietnam war to show how wrong you are.

Most of the things you are pointed aren't even the objective of the Japanese Imperial forces, Japan holds nothing what it had, besides it's main islands, were why more fucked and economically broken than the U.K. You can't even call it a tactical victory.

Judging the outcome of battles as the result of a war is some other level of historical revisionism. lol

>then why didnt finland do it?
because we weren't evil oppressive people wanting to subjugate half the world. anglo isn't strategic or cunning but he is evil and greedy. it's the latter things that created british empire.