Very good chance link will be needed for this: >Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) has announced the formation of a data consortium in partnership with IBM and law firm Herbert Smith Freehills for the purpose of building a groundbreaking large-scale, cross-industry smart contract platform for Australian businesses to collaborate and do business within. >The platform, which will be called the Australian National Blockchain (ANB) is being touted as potentially game-changing infrastructure within Australia’s digital economy, helping businesses around the country make use of legally-enforceable smart contracts and exchange data, as well as confirm the status and authenticity of legal contracts. >In other words, Australian businesses will gain the ability to use smart contracts to automatically trigger business events and processes using preset milestones. The smart legal contracts (SLC) provided by ANB include clauses to accommodate recording of information from external data sources such as IoT devices, with the ability to self-execute once conditions listed in the contract are met. hmm.. I wonder how they will get that data onto the blockchain to be used in trustless smart contracts? Will they trust a centralised third party for this data worth billions? Or use a decentralised network of oracles... hmm.....
>CISRO >leaked every single Australian phone number to the Chinese. >said Chinese then spammed everyone's mobile demanding large sums of cash otherwise they will be considered a defector to the Chinese goverment. >Aussie chinks and migrants pay up to the scam. >Man in charge goes on long service leave.
hahahahahahaha those fucks are brain dead, I still get gooky messages from them.
>commonwealth bank Yeah they are okay but not too much better than NAB. Ohhh Jow Forums if only I could tell you what happens there.
Eli Cooper
That's nice but there is no concrete connection between chainlink and glbc. Google it.
Caleb Perez
I had a phone call on my mobile the other week and it was a recorded voice talking in Chinese, is that what that was?
How many blockchain agnostic oracles could support Integra? Maybe they could ask openlaw for help, or maybe all their law firms which are part of accord?
Christopher Stewart
I had Bill Tai the science guy come and shill his bags to us at my university.
Jordan Moore
Definitely comfy read. I’m able to sleep tonight, frens
I've had that before too. I googled the phone number they masked their own with, it was a swimming pool in sydney lol. I just shouted "fuck off gook cunt" and hung up
Australia is a fucking shithole and if they are getting on board it's literal FUD.
t. Australian
Justin Diaz
From first link >the new platform is set to be built by IBM on their on their cloud platform
>OMG LOOK THIS PERSONS MEDIUM ACCOUNT IS CALLED CLAUSE TOP FUCKING KEK
This is peak delusional linkie
Jackson Torres
Sounds like you live in Sydney lmaoing @ ur life
Caleb Long
I live in sydney and its great except for the traffic and smog
Owen Hughes
when doge coin is better than link. DOGE IS MOONING RIGHT NOW
Leo Lewis
Official Clause account you pelican
If you cant see the most obviously fucking connected dots you don't deserve to make it
Sebastian Sanders
Sorry bro but you are officially delusional if you think a single word being used is proof of a hidden connection or anything else. Pic related is your brain on chainlink.
for a city full of jerkoff financial services wage slaves you have very bad cocaine
Jeremiah Phillips
Hahaha linkies are by far the most deluded
Jose Sullivan
i know there is a lot of delusion here, but obvious or not, partnerships or not, LINK has the best chance of being the defacto Oracle... if they complete what they set out too.
if you are a project that needs an Oracle for your blockchain (private or public), and care about decentralization/trustless execution odd's are you will end up at LINK eventually, even if you dont know it now
Sebastian Lewis
Uhh Australia is such a shit country. Anything related to australia is bearish
Ryder Jones
quality bags for $200, anything you get from a pub or the casino is trash and has been stepped on half a dozen times
Brandon Young
Great, you'd want to smash it straight after work considering the government wants you in bed nice and early.
Kayden Gray
"Smart Clauses" Now that's a term you see everyday!
Just google it, not even cherry picking here. The first 3 results. Stay poor mate
Jacob Robinson
brainlet here. how is this connected to CL in any way? from what I understand it does the same thing that CL is promising.
Jackson Howard
>chinks everywhere >sudanese everywhere >pajeets everywhere >cars everywhere >people everywhere >most unaffordable city in the world >public transport delayed or canceled all the time making your 2 hour commute a 4 hour commute Sounds fucking great user
>winery drives RBT every 45 metres >breweries That are full of Australians >unspoilt beaches Yeah they're alright.
Christopher Cook
You forgot the bongs cunt
Caleb Hall
think you missed an "o" there, cuz
Brody Powell
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.
The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.
Cryptographic lawyer here, you'll take my job from my cold dead hands
Jacob Jenkins
I don't care about Link but if it can put Lawyers on the street then I am all for it.
Kevin Edwards
>ctrl + f “chainlink” >0 results It’s nothing.
Wyatt Adams
What’s fucking crazy is they’ll just use the many other ways you can get data into their smart contracts. None of this is going to happen anymore it’s over.
Because Chainlink might be associated with Australia, which is causing panic selling.
Blake Baker
why the hate for the chinks? They're collectively bringing in ~20 billion per year from education and living expenses alone
Parker Adams
It’s fucking over. Give it a rest man.
Samuel Diaz
this is quite good
also chekt
Angel Edwards
Sergey here, I’m coming for you
Jose Hall
thats bc they got funding raped government is the best entity to conduct costly and sometimes fruitless research and development in the hope of producing a scientific breakthrough like wifi because they have the deepest pockets and can bear the cost
