As our next scheduled network upgrade approaches, I've completed further Bulletproofs optimizations to squeeze as much speed as possible out of transaction verification. As was our original goal, tests show that transaction size is crazy small and transaction times are crazy fast. Tests on a few different machines suggest that verifying one Bulletproof is over 4 times faster than our old method, and verifying a batch of 64 Bulletproofs is over 36 times faster than the old method! We also added some additional checks and safeguards to reflect suggestions from our audit process, taking a belt-and-suspenders approach. There is additional side work happening on some Bulletproofs generalizations that could be useful later. To help with this, I made a quick Python port of basic Bulletproofs functionality that is substantially simpler than the original; this port is for prototyping only, and is neither efficient nor asserted to be secure for production use.
Thank you for being part of the most competent and active group of developers in this crypto-sphere
Charles Walker
I like how you can read noether as no-ether.
Wyatt Hernandez
XMR just got better? Nice.
Levi Thomas
#dontmakecompaniesrich
Joseph Adams
ZEC is where you want to be.
Jackson Edwards
Checked but die poor wall street shill
Kevin Jackson
>666 Nice try, deep state
Ayden Johnson
Hey I'm all in Link at the moment, but the fundamentals of Monero triggered me in a good way. Is it a good coin to mine? Currently have a gtx 1070 and i58600K processor.
>Hey I'm all in Link at the moment, but the fundamentals of Monero triggered me in a good way. Is it a good coin to mine? Currently have a gtx 1070 and i58600K processor.
Never go all ... if it fails , you loose everything. if your good at investing , when you fail at 1 out of many , in a diverse portfolio , you loose nothing , because in most times , you would win. But if you fail at 1 time , when you keep doing all ins , you might loose everything.
