Open borders could increase global GDP by 50% - 150%

According to an article published in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, economists have estimated that removing "labor mobility barriers [immigration restrictions], the estimated gains are often in the range of 50-150 percent of world GDP" (Clemens 84). Of course, these gains may not be distributed evenly, but it doesn't appear that there are many people that would be harmed by this. The same study noted that "the literature contains no documented case of large declines in GDP or massive declines in public-service provision at the destination caused by immigration" (Clemens 93), "there are also many plausible positive externalities from increased immigration" (Clemens 93), and that "all serious economic studies of the aggregate fiscal effects of immigration have found them to be fairly small overall - small and positive at the federal level" (Clemens 93).

With this information in mind, do think it would be a good idea for countries to loosen their border and immigration restrictions?

Article:
pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.25.3.83

Attached: border.jpg (1500x1125, 439K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nber.org/papers/w12497.pdf
pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.25.3.83
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

No. This is a trap. Third world countries have shit culture.

you should know

As long as benefits like welfare are reserved for citizens then I don't see the issue

I support open b orders

Attached: tfw no mestizobf.png (802x1078, 518K)

This is true. Why do you think american elites love immigration? It's good for the economy. And as we know, the only thing that matters is the economy.

How long would you allow an immigrant to have welfare until he integrates?

Come on, you know your country have shit culture. Everything is unorganized and people in general are very corrupt. Third world countries need to change culture first.

Eat dick. I do not want people to immigrate and help the empire remain as powerful as it is now. First thing we must do is kick out the US from here.

spic hours are just the worst. trump 2020 can't come fast enough

...

No the first thing you have to do is to get rid of the security issues and corrupt politicians. Then you can start making better relationships with other countries. Just like El Salvador is doing right now.
Fuck off, Central American culture is the best.

All of the money in the world would be just as valuable as all of the money in the future, retard.

An article published in the National Bureau of Economic Research found a "a positive and significant effect of the 1990-2004 immigration on the average wage of U.S.-born workers overall, both in the short run and in the long run. This positive effect results from averaging a positive effect on wages of U.S.-born workers with at least a high school degree and a small negative effect on wages of U.S.-born workers with no high school degree." This article focuses just on the U.S., but the effects would likely be similar in other developed countries.

Article:
nber.org/papers/w12497.pdf

what if there's more to life than buying things we don't need?

Attached: dLTrFBgjGSqR.jpg (1916x945, 238K)

>Of course, these gains may not be distributed evenly
Into the trash it goes.

Attached: 1551841067667.webm (790x442, 2.82M)

the entire argument relies on the premise that you can import people endlessly and they won’t have any affect on the things that actually cause increased productivity in western countries I.e. legal systems, infrastructure, social norms etc
all tof those things that would supposedly cause increased gdp would be destroyed instantly if you imported a billion third worlders

save the environment. kick out illegals. the good life

said the racist
people are interchangable cogs with no differences at all

Would increasing global migration and GDP get in the way of those other things in life?

Do you have a version with sound? Otherwise, anybody could have just added those subtitles even if he didn't actually say those things.

Also, it doesn't appear that the gains would just be limited to the elites, and, at the very least, migrants themselves would gain a lot. "If half the population of the poor region emigrates, migrants would gain $23 trillion" (Clemens 85).

Article: pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.25.3.83

>source: an economist
economists are all shills for the rich

Firstly, do you have any better sources?
Secondly, there are plenty of economists, such as Paul Krugman for example, that are quite critical of the things the elites do. I will admit that I don't know much about the authors of the articles I've cited.

>Firstly, do you have any better sources?
there are no sources because economy is as much of a science as astrology or alchemy
all you can go by is history and it's been demonstrated that mass immigration has been a burden on western societies orchestrated for the benefit of a few

>sanders opposing easy votes for his party
ballsy

>there are no sources because economy is as much of a science as astrology or alchemy
Why do you say that? This may have been true in the 1700's and 1800's, but modern economics is about as empirical and scientific as, say, physics. If you doubt their methodologies, just read the articles I've linked.

>all you can go by is history and it's been demonstrated that mass immigration has been a burden on western societies orchestrated for the benefit of a few
Examples?

If by physics you mean weather forecasts for more than two weeks, then sure. They have similar rate of success when predicting future.

>security issues
Literally unsolvable without solving the root problems first, and those are unsolvable without changing the system
>corrupt politicians
they are but a product of the system. changing the system so it represents the people fairly would piss off a few nations (mainly the hegemon of the north)

>muh money muh gdp yes goyim yes yes yes hnnnng
capitalism must be destroyed

funny how whiteoids are starting to reject capitalism while china rises. what's the matter firsties, too stupid to compete?

the rise of china was solely because of greedy western capitalism

It is hilarious how mongs blame mass migration on the left when it is all these corporate cock suckers that literally see no issue with replace entire populations just as long as there is a bit of growth.

I 100% unironically agree with this.
t. B.A. in econ MBA in international finance

>Muh GDP is everything
fuck off toilberg, ensuring a good quality of living for all through socialism is a better goal for society than buying porky's second yacht.

Based

and i wonder whose pockets most of that money will go into

china is rising because of capitalism retard

This is obvious. From a purely economic perspective, closed border is stupid, as it raise the wages artificially.

>consumerism distracts us from the important things in life, like hating foreigners

t. Commie

Kys capitalist kike

that's the point you fucking moron. capitalism was supposed to bring about peace all over the world, but once a foreign power plays the game better than the west, whitoids cry foul and want to take their ball home. pathetic

Kike

Communist retard.
Anti-semitism is a big no no here

Kys rootless consumerist mongrel

Attached: give-up-your-culture-give-up-your-culture-heritage-is-26050998.png (500x636, 126K)

"better" as in having more people, stealing shit, and industrializing and modernizing late is useful to have the country built on newer infrastructure. Of course india and china will be leaders eventually it is mostly just a catchup game for them as the number of people they have will always make them that way

>"better" as in having more people, stealing shit, and industrializing and modernizing late is useful to have the country built on newer infrastructure
this completely describes how the british and countries in europe saw the rise of the united states in the late 19th / early 20th century. the hypocrisy is unreal

it can be true in both cases

only if we construct projects in rich neighborhoods to house them. make the rich faggots that benefit from it, also suffer the consequences.

Open borders can increase the GDP says nervous globalist for the 8th time in four years as the economy crashes being unable to handle so many economic immigrants.
.
.

Isn't immigration a bit of a taboo subject in economist circles?

american economy keeps growing while european economies stagnate. the US is way more lax on immigration than europe. to deny the economic correlation is ignorant

the us economy is different from europe's in a number of ways

Economics isn't a science.
Anything economists say can be ignored.

Only white people benefit from the growth

the world has only so many resources
what happens if we start running out and the borders are wide open?

Attached: uwnnxxtfvmx21.jpg (727x991, 109K)

kys subhuman

>Only white people benefit from the growth
lol that's why trump got elected right. jewish capitalists and their legion of h1b worker bees accrue capital at the expense of the average american, who are still nonhispanic white. whites lose spots in upper education, have to pay higher taxes to fund ever ballooning social services due to increase in immigrants. whites are having less children, marrying later, and rent more often than own homes. it's the global elite who feels no allegiance to any particular country who benefits from the growth, not "white people"

America also has far less welfare

and we have the military budget of all the EU countries and then some

you're overrating culture, if people have similar opportunities in life they behave the same everywhere.

no they don't

This user is right.

bernie is based

lol

based from him

>Of course, these gains may not be distributed evenly
understatement of the century

>muh GDP
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yeah right because safety, high trust and preservation of culture are so irrelevant!
More GDP doesn't mean shit if your country turns into a shithole. A country is not just a marketplace.

yeah i dont think any country has welfare for immigrants yet
5 years, it's the global standard

>More people more gdp
Wow amazing conclussion, what about quality of life and crime?

all the rich people will live in gated communities. they dont care.

he will win

America for Americans

The damage it causes to social cohesion, the political system (especially if the immigrants are muslims) are not really counted. Furthermore, as the study itself points, pretty much every country but a few would get brain drained to death while 4 cities kept all the wealth and skilled folks

>modern economics is about as empirical and scientific as, say, physics
AHAAHHAHAHA OH NONONONONO

Of course it would increase GDP when an immigrant moves from africa to Europe that individuals GDP increases to that of that country (maybe less than average but still a massive increase). Of course it would increase competition for jobs tenfold because third worlders work for peanuts and put a massive strain on resources but the rich dont care about either of these things.

Obviously only a few elite would get all the cash while the average joe would see their status lowered

yes but it would fuck the low end job marker in highly developed countries so nobody would vote for it.

>rich get more money if we import slave labor
neat.

I'd rather be poor and sleep with my doors unlocked than have le GDP memes with mud slaves running around raping people

Attached: 0_Je_qiT94uIdcly2V.jpg (1024x576, 37K)

Look at it through the framework of medicine.

Yes, you can hire a cheap Venezuelan doctor in a field you have a short supply of, but would you really want to?

>BRO THINK OF THE GDP BRO!!!!!!!! BRO THINK OF THE ECONOMY MAN BRO, BRO JUST, HOLD ON BRO, JUUUUUUST THINK OF THE ECONOMIC GROTH BRO
Reminder that this new wave of politics which seems to primarially focus itself on the economy is just a symptom of a larger disease which is eating away at the heart of cultures around the world. And this disease is corporatism.

This disease is turbo capitalism

idiot.
parasites cross borders not to work but to get gibs.

Attached: 1553701532068.jpg (247x256, 42K)

why didn't they think of Why their "literature" has nothing in it?
it's because no-one in the world so far has open borders with countries that are way shittier than their own.
and the ones like Arab Emirates that import slave labor have are fascist and have police forces that mercilessly beat down any grumbling masses.

That means I can buy more pointless stuff for my wife's son!

Attached: 1560671976283.jpg (1024x960, 115K)

It would improve the global GDP, improve the revenue of the large companies and the wealth of the rich but drastically decrease the per capita GDP of the natives. Unfortunately in America nobody understood that