Does your cunt's military have women in it? What are they like?

Most of them are just fucktoys for the entire platoon and 90% of them become pregnant and drop out of the Army in two months.

no

They shouldn't be put to frontline duty. They shouldn't share barracks with men.
They should be put to other roles. They could have their own units, which wouldn't be such a hassle if women weren't such a tiny proportion of the conscripts.

I served with a few women. They were good people too, and while criticism of the special stuff they get is in my opinion justified the way most of the guys talk about them, usually behind their backs, is in my opinion unjustified.
If there were more women serving and wouldn't me mixed with the men these problems wouldn't be nearly so pronounced.
also this wouldn't be such a problem.

Attached: 1488462300841.jpg (511x767, 77K)

There are noncombat roles women can serve in and particularly things like interrogating female POWs.

Yes, I think they can even apply for the SAS. Considering male applicant success rate is tiny I don't see a woman ever managing it though.

yeah every company is assigned a girl for the guys to rape

if you refuse to do it you will be assumed gay, and everyone is free to rape you as well

Women are unbelievably weak and injury-prone. They also have more complex hygiene needs than men and have a high chance of being raped if captured by the enemy.

youtube.com/watch?v=K7SoztdOtY0

Based. Incels have no place in the military.

>interrogating female POWs
hot

All the women in are officers so they're going to be self-motivated+competitive and probably don't drag the system down at all. On the other hand most women in the US military are pogs who get knocked up to get time off and avoid going overseas

>I do think women shouldn't be soldiers.

They should absolutely never be in front-line roles at a minimum. You have to constantly watch their back for them because you don't want them getting captured to become a pincushion for mudslime dick, they're naturally weaker than men as you said, and they disrupt unit cohesion because as soon as you introduce any woman into a group of men--no matter how fat or ugly she is--it immediately turns into a competition to see who is the most alpha.

>Considering male applicant success rate is tiny I don't see a woman ever managing it though.

In theory that would be true. In practice they standards will get altered or some other bullshit will happen because there is political pressure to get them in, even if they don't deserve to be

it does but theyre not trusted with proper military specializations so they just do things in the office

So US Army women are the same thing as teachers and women in public service in Europe?

hijabi snipers

I don't see any nation undermining their national security for a political agenda. The push for female recruits is most likely just a way to boost recruitment as a whole, whatever role they end up in.

Particularly not with the SAS. A much physically weaker soldier puts everyone else at higher risk. I think you'd see some backlash themselves.

Women are physically weak as fuck. A man in his 60s could overpower a 25 year old woman.

>Nations won't undermine their national security for a political agenda
Tell that to the Germans
Say hello to their minister of defense

Attached: fqo74az9rhm21.png (820x461, 310K)

>Of course I believe we should send the weaklings into war first. And then let the strong finish it off with a decisive strike.

Attached: 1564045979826.jpg (1080x1331, 115K)

>Grunts
>Being involved with national security in a significant way
Lol they are literally just there to die.

Even better, let the strong remain at home and procreate. While the beta women fight it out across the atlantic.

Yes. They are fighting the hunger inside base kitchens

women do not serve in INFANTERY; just to decorate and administrative work ... maybe the flight of fighting planes. His body is weak.

Attached: 3.7 (Chileans army 1).png (775x2202, 3.57M)

being Minister hardly requires physical exertion or military experience.

>I don't see any nation undermining their national security for a political agenda.
That's because you're conflating two different things

women are shit for combat role and military experience
the only good role they can do his fighter jet pilot

This should make a good patriotic woman. Infantry to men

Attached: 62088445_2355078614814896_2890550961172356260_n.jpg (1040x1716, 321K)

>as soon as you introduce any woman into a group of men--no matter how fat or ugly she is--it immediately turns into a competition to see who is the most alpha
Are all yanks like this? Do you all live as if you are in a film you have seen?

bump

Are all Britons as low-T as you?

Would not be effective sitting in a trench full of vagina blood because the tampon care package was dropped behind enemy lines by accident whilst my mind is clouded with sweet pheremones snd juicy boobs distracting me

Im asking the questions here yank

women are too different than men

an military unit should be like a fist ,not like scatter fingers

Not anymore

Attached: shitposting license.jpg (438x438, 15K)

weaklings are usually the smart ones that have to stay home and design the weapons. You kill them off you're be back to fighting with rocks and sticks pretty soon.

>conscripting women ever
they're just the disposable bait trophies for the enemy.

Lmao

ITT: Sexist idiots

Jog on Chad

imagine the smell

seething roastie

Fuck off, hambeast.

Tell that to the guy trying to slot you from 100m away with an old ak or to an IED

Let me explain it to you in terms you can understand, you disgusting whale. Do you _really_ want to march around in the Afghan hills carring 30 pounds of equipment and risk being raped if they capture you?

women should be only allowed to join the air force
in all the other role,their are shit
they disorganize the unit,have special treatment
even the norway female 'special force' cant do push ups properly

Attached: images (9).jpg (554x554, 34K)

cringee

bump

pumb