Why does Netherlands have the best art?
Why does Netherlands have the best art?
It's realistic, that's how I imagine all artists
Aaaaayyyyy Vermeer is my favorite artist. I want to travel to Delft just to admire his paintings.
Don't ask, no one knows
>It's realistic
Ah yes, the great realist painters like Bosch or Brueghel the elder
Escher and Mondriaan are the most realistic.
Mark Rothko and Yves Klein are the best hyperrealist painters in history.
More like the most overrated kitch in the world.
Hhhmmm, sorry sweaty but you
misspelled FRANCE.
I do like Bouguereau desu
>academic paintings
Disgusting
My favorite painter. He was a one trick pony in the sense that he only painted young women in domestic ambients but he mastered it to the purest extend.
To present day you can tell a painting by Bougereau just by the topic and the realism depicted. His use of shadows and light is flawless.
>in the sense that he only painted young women in domestic ambients
What? That's completely false
>To present day you can tell a painting by Bougereau just by the topic and the realism depicted
He used all the commonplaces one can find in painting's history (it's not a bad thing, just nothing to be particularly proud of)
>His use of shadows and light is flawless.
He paints like an over-gifted autistic child. Some pretty stuff.
Yuck
You can give him credit that nobody wanted to paint in that style after him
The biggest difference between old Dutch and foreign portraits, is that in other countries they painted royalty.
The Netherlands painted common folk due to our egalitarian nature.
for me, it's Klimt
Pic related composed a minimum of his whole collection of artworks. You can tell he didn't feel comfortable depicting this kind of sceneries. The lighting looks fucked up and it doesn't give a sense of depth to the scene.
His anatomical proportions IMO are correct, so that a good thing but this kind pf paintings are subpar when compared with his multiple portraits of young females.
He was the best there is at what he did, there's no point on arguing about it.
>no sense of depth
>lights fucked up
don't you think he may be trying to say something with these, uh?
Yeah, for sure. And religious sceneries put me in an uncomfortable situation since you could argue with a broad sense of right that he did it on purpose in order to depict the divine nature of Christ and The Holy Mother.
However, if we look deeper into the rest of his artwork this trend continues, the main figures in this setting just don't blend with the scenery as good as they do on his portraits.
I'm not too familiar with Bougereau's biography but I'd say this kind of paintings were more of a customer's petition.
rescuing this thread with some good Jow Forums art.
Ramon Casas, Catalonian
Lienz, austrian
Eakins, American
Arcimboldo, ¿¿¿the first surrealist artist???
ottavio mazzonis, Italian
Mucha, czech
repin, russian
Arrak, Estonian
from the kelmscott chaucer: illustration by edward burne jones, verse by chaucer, english.
hopper, american. done posting now, honk* honk*
"The Torture of Cuauhtémoc"
Leandro Izaguirre, 1893
Mexico