USA beats Japan

>USA beats Japan
>Russia beats Germany
>Britain beats ???

Attached: 4088579_orig.jpg (400x296, 41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Mers-el-Kébir
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

their meat

...France.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Mers-el-Kébir

>USA beats europe economy thanks to it.
>UK gone full camper and coward
>URSS do all the job and still USA steal some URSS territories
>France went full femenine submissive trap
lol i love how we live in a meme world

britain beat germany
if germany have won battle of britain
germany would have beaten russia

nya ^w^

>and still USA steal some URSS territories
Name 5

>this is what wehraboos unironically believe
krauts had literally 0 chances of ever winning the war, deal with it

Germany, France, Binland, Norway, Sweden

Germany COULD NOT beat Britain. Even if the war in the sky were somehow won, there's no way the pitiful German navy could beat the British navy. Memelion was a joke and Churchill even reacted to it by saying something among the lines of "the Germans are more than welcome to try". The only hope of beating Britain was Plan Z, the plan to match and defeat Britain's surface fleet. Problem: Dönitz foresaw the Kriegsmarine matching the Royal Navy... in 1941. Hitler declared war in 1939 and was thereby forced to divert resources away from the navy. As a consequence the mighty Bismarck was contained to supply raids (during which it sunk) and the only carrier the Germans ever built (Graf Zeppelin) spent all of its time in port doing NOTHING until the Russians captured and sunk it.

Germany COULD NOT defeat Russia the moment America started Lend-Leasing them.
>B-But the Germans did really well in early Barbarossa
Against the professional army in a barely mobilized Russia. The Germans got dunked on the moment the Russian reserves reached the front (which was by then admittedly only a stone's throw away from Moscow and Stalingrad).

Hell, even Germany defeating France was fully and completely down to the fact that the French cold not prepare defenses due to Belgian neutrality. Had the Belgians allowed the French to operate in their territory (or even extend the Maginot Line into Belgium as originally planned) the Germans would find France a very though nut to crack.

Wehraboos need to leave.

Attached: 1554162382966.jpg (1280x720, 390K)

beat me to it

If the USA didn't intervene, Moscow would have fallen into Germany's hands. Can't deny that and i'm absolutely no Wehrboo.

Russia doesn't beat Germany. The Soviet Union with massive land leasing funding defeated the 3rd Reich in a multi-front war.

And for the millionth time now: Hitler was Austrian and at least 50% of the NSDAP leadership were also Austrians.

Seethe pasta spamming is gay and homosexual

Beat your meat to it omg lmao

They beat italy

>free france mentionned
werent they literally less relevant than the fucking poles?

im not wehraboo
im just saying that without the bongs,allies would have lost

you over extended and your oil was quite literally freezing, even if you somehow took moscow you would've lost the war anyway

What is the difference between Germans and Austrians?

Stalingrad was the turning point. Not only did we lose a lot of soldiers there, we never had as many people as the soviets to compensate our losses in the first place. So no matter what, once we would have inevitably lost our manpower, USSR would've just steamrolled us.

not iceland

Attached: cod war.png (331x927, 140K)

one is german. the other is german but calls themselves something different

offensive capabilities were completely exhausted by then. Even if you took moscow, the original goal was the USSR's industrial center hundreds of miles further East.
Also the majority of lend-lease aid would get to the USSR after 1942 by which time had dug in for the winter and siege of moscow.

This

Also, America needed Britain for aircraft carriers in liberating Europe