1. cunt
2. what is the answer?
1. cunt
1
it's actually 16
it isn't written properly, retard
Call me retarded but I thought it was 8 and then I realized I have no idea
16
Gotta be this
> #
>it's actually 16
7
1
Though i am, admittedly, not great at math.
based brazilians ITT
1
Fite me
Flag
1
Ez maths all other options are wrong and massively gay
which takes priority in order of operations, the division, or the jew thing?
2+2=4
8/2 =4
4x4=16
Jew thing. Always.
It’s maths, that’s what they excel at
it's intentionally left vague so that retards will argue about it on the internet
1. Flag
2. I'm not getting bogged down in an argument about order of operations when the question's clearly been designed to be deliberately ambiguous for the sole purpose of fostering disagreement.
1
looks fine to me
it's the fucking jews
how should you write it?
It's a question of if you multiply 2 x (2+2) or 8 / 2 first
That depends entirely on what situation it represents.
>16 order of operations
3.1416
you should never use that division symbol, for one thing
It's not vague.
1. what's inside parentheses
2. exponentiation/root extraction
3. multiplication/division
4. addition/subtraction
5. left to right
Simple. It's 16.
1
Indeed, and the ((())) come first
Then it’s divisions / multiplications from left to right
>(Parentheses), Exponents
>Multiple and Divide,
>Add Subtract, easy as that.
>Use Pemdas to get it right!
Oy vey, oy gevalt, it's like another shoah
if it weren't vague, then people wouldn't be arguing about it in this very thread
x
_ is much clearer than x÷y
y
8/2*(2+2)
8/2*4
4*4
16
OR
8/2*4
8/8
1
IT SHOULD BE WRITTEN (8/2)*(2+2)
People are arguing because most are stupid and can't remember simple rules.
x
_ , x/y, x÷y is the same thing.
y
>x->infinite
Brainlet image for brainlet use.
1
the fuck is a pemdas
you cant do that, Satan.
you'd have to replace all the twos for Xs
Solve it!
it's the same thing but the notation is confusing and open to misinterpretation, which is why iso recommends not to use ÷, and why you won't see it in higher level mathematics
In this case it's not because you can interpret it as
8 /(2(2+2)) or (8/2)(2 (2+2))
Fuck ÷
Can't be done. We have already established x=2
The equation you presented implies X is different from 2.
I said solve it.
0.5+x0.25
it is 16, all other answers are brainlet tier
1
thank you for your service
You can solve it, it has an infinite number of solution but you need to find the domain. It's not any infinite.
2
No, there is only one interpretation, rules: >8/2(2+2)
You first solve what's inside parentheses
>8/2(4)
Remove & format the useless parentheses
>8/2*4
Left to right
>4*4
>16
There is NO other interpretation, you can't add parentheses in the right because you think "it's vague" and "open to interpretation"
Apparently it's 16, but if you ask me there should be a rule saying that 2(2+2)=(2*(2+2))
It's vague indeed because the 2 is attached to the parenthesis without a proper sign, implying multiplication, thus implying a superparenthesis
8/[2(2+2)]>8/(4+4)>1
Had it been written
8/2•(2+2) then 8/2 (4) + 2+2 (4) = 16
So it's actually 1. And all because monkeys cannot into • before parenthesis.
it isn't correct. The sentence is ambiguous, for we don't know if its (8/2)*(2+2) or 8/(2*[2+2])
this, french are math masters and he is right
Could be 1 or 16, but we'll never know because the equation is not fucking written right and it's on purpose.
16
It's an acronym!
aren't the parentheses bound to the two? meaning "2(2+2)" is a whole separate thing from "8".
>l'education americane
>this thread
>5
120 desu
This one isn't ambiguous, the answer can only be 120.
Thank you for your service, Hernandez
it's 6 u fucking retards
did i get it right?
No it's not. Multiplication has prevalence over addition, Alexandre.
Brainlet.
Big brain.
pemdas, simple as
1 +1 isn't 4 retard xd
16
Nothing to argue about here, if you disagree with it you are disagreeing with order of operation of every calculator in the world.
Brainlet here.
Russia
16
It's not simple and I'm wrong, yes?
I think you goofed the first step.
Anyone who thinks this is not 16, please get the fuck out.
The answer is 5!
5! = 120
did i?
fat finger dont work on phone well
Americans write 1 like I
Should be
8 (2+x)
______
2
Big brain but shouldn't have told the answer.
1 and 16. It's not written properly.
Ahhhh, putain de francais de merde, he tricked me well.
Goodbye, I'm heading to the cuck room.
I told the answer to ruin your fun
take that pierre
thats for blowing up our ships
>1 and 16. It's not written properly.
*1 or 16
Dunno
Maths is for fucking nerds.
The correct answer is 17 (1+16)
Yeah I'm the fucking retard. I swear the Euros on here grew up eating fucking lead paint chips.
Rude, my kiwi bro.
Good night, future ex-brainlet.
It's only 16.
Alright, let's plug the numbers and see
8/2(2+2)=16
8/(2(2+2)) would be 1
Fine, yes, you're right.
you are if you think the answer could be 1 kek
Why do some people think you always do multiplication before division? Wtf is wrong with you?
Honestly, you have to have some kind of brain damage if you think the answer is not clear. It is 16.
Simple as that.