Was it justified? Where the Arabs mistreated by the Turks? Do they regret it?
WW1 Arab Revolt
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>Bite the hand that feeds you
Typical Slav behaviour
>Arabs betray Enver Pasha for Brits
>Brits give Arabs land to Jews
Now that's what I call karma
>Was it justified
believe it or not, revolting against an opressor doesn't need further justification.
But they were fighting for your religion, no? What about the Ummah?
Lawerence paid them good money
old people tell us about the things that they had to endure because of the ottomans it was totally justified , fuck Turks and Brits
en.wikipedia.org
> "Soldiers! I appeal to you in the name of the Prophet, my witness. I command you to defend him and his city to the last cartridge and the last breath, irrespective of the strength of the enemy. May Allah help us, and may the prayers of Muhammad be with us.
"Officers of the heroic Turkish army! O little Muhammads, come forward and promise me, before our Lord and the Prophet, to honor your faith with the supreme sacrifice of your lives."
tfw the Arabs fought against such noble religious men, damn.
>your
i'm neither muslim nor west asian, but it's funny to me when people act like occupation can be justified so long as the oppressor shares the same religion as the oppressed, but only when the people in question are muslims. people would laugh at the idea of a single christian superstate, disregarding culture, ethnicity and identity for the sake of representing christendom. and rightfully so, that's a fucking retarded concept
Turkic nations are all alone in this world